Thinking about all the actual newshounds who spent their living researching and investigating corruption and how many lost their jobs in wave after wave of media layoffs while watching the NYT pour a small fortune into having 20 different people rehash the same argument every single day.
6 replies
111 reposts
430 likes
Great advice, consider it taken! I am happy to delete any of my comments if they are over a line, unintentional as that would be.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Peter Jacobs
The official 2024 GOP platform makes a reference to "Christian-hating Communists" who the Republicans will keep from entering the country. Back in the early days of the America First movement, "Christian-hating Communists" would have just been a longer way of saying "Jews."
29 replies
275 reposts
953 likes
I think you're misunderstanding me, I'm asking the guy who said, "I see a lot of asides and diversions, and of course a lot of dishonest grievance whistles, but his point at the end is his point at the start" what Trump's point was and what in Trump's words would lead someone to that conclusion.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Being old isn't the same thing as dementia. I don't know what Biden's current situation is, but my own experience with people with dementia is that their non-dementia caretakers couldn't handle Biden's schedule let alone the actual dementia sufferers. But maybe he's being puppeteered by a cabal 🤷
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
What was the point of that Trump monologue, and what in the text would lead someone to conclude that?
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
*Offer only valid when considering the insanely anomalous 2023 values. SSTs are still shockingly high relative to any other July before last year's.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
"They won't even let me be Irish anymore, Jack."
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Seems like it should be something of a red flag that the "ban contraception not just abortion", climate denying, pro-insurrection, Project 2025 lunatics' position on the origin of the pandemic is indistinguishable from supposedly "fact checked" NYT op-eds. Weird!
0 replies
2 reposts
5 likes
I don't know if it's a good idea or not for Biden to stay the nominee. I don't know if he's secretly concealing a health issue.
I am however confident that we've seen a deluge of reporting ostensibly on those questions that reflects social dynamics rather than substantive fact.
Which is familiar!
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
If any of us had any actionable, reliable advice on how to win Presidential campaigns, would we be sitting around skeeting half-baked takes about it?
That's why I am focused on the 'how media shapes public understanding of empirical reality' aspect. It's at least somewhat in my pers/prof experience
2 replies
0 reposts
18 likes
I have no special insight into Biden's health or his odds of winning reelection. I have no idea what will happen next.
But I am really skeeved out by the way so many people in the media seem to be playing weird games (or I guess are very ill informed?) about all this, however. It's quite grim.
0 replies
0 reposts
11 likes
This is an odd posture to take because it sounds like you either don't know that he's made multiple, forceful, on the record statements about not stepping aside (which would be pretty ill-informed!) or else you're aware but framing things this way for rhetorical effect, which seems kinda... slimey?
1 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
Okay, sure the NYT may have stumbled with their 'China and Fauci frankensteined up the pandemic' stuff, but recall they've done such a phenomenal job with Clinton's email server, trans people, Maxine Gay's 'plagiarism', shoplifting, policing, and the economy, can't we just call it a one off mistake?
3 replies
11 reposts
45 likes
When you write "It’s up to Biden to weigh these competing factors and express his wishes", how many more times and way does he need to this before it counts, for you?
I have no idea whether or not it's a good decision, but he's made it pretty clear?
1 replies
1 reposts
19 likes
Whether it's genuine crankery or cynical scapegoating by cowardly politicians, it's insane to see a non-profit science org get thrown under the bus as a result of conspiracy theories like this.
It will do nothing to appease those opposed to public health & science.
www.statnews.com/2024/07/08/e...
1 replies
6 reposts
14 likes
Reposted by Peter Jacobs
Banner month for the Economist.
19 replies
60 reposts
491 likes
www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9ml...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tArK...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Peter Jacobs
the thing you really can't over-emphasize about reactionary centrists is how *dumb* they are
www.persuasion.community/p/a-guide-fo...
47 replies
116 reposts
901 likes