The Supreme Court’s ruling putting presidents above the law must be understood not simply as a grant of immunity for past crimes, but an enthusiastic endorsement of those he will commit if given the chance. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
24 replies
522 reposts
1420 likes
If there ever were Feds on Bluesky for monitoring purposes they just got the dreamiest, most bestest workday they could ever imagine
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by S knows that p
Try not to think of it as Trump will never be held accountable for his four years of crimes, but instead think of the fact that he will be completely unrestrained by any laws against the crimes he will commit if he gets elected again.
3 replies
42 reposts
176 likes
Thank you. I will take one teeny bite next time I come across unpeeled kiwi
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
My god. They actually did it. My hope was that they would be just shook enough not to actually do it. Goddamn.
And the message this sends to our allies, to the world in general. Man oh man
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Then why did they hold it until the last possible day?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I did not know! Is it scratchy?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Hold up. People eat kiwis with the skin? Link is that true?
2 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Never forget that David Brooks tweeted that “like many of us who protested in the streets during the racial unrest of the summer of 2020……”
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Elie was my favorite human(s)-only Twitter follow hands down
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
It’s stuff like this when you really sit with and let it sink in that shows concretely how far we are even from 2020
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes