one very practical reason to avoid transphobia is it seems to turn its adherents into deranged, obsessive fuckin freaks
21 replies
34 reposts
341 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
This poll is extremely convincing:
• 13 point swing to Harris among independents
• 8 point swing to Harris among POC
• 6 point to Harris among women
I strongly agreed with your column anyway but this poll is rock solid evidence that it's time to make the switch. Let Harris win.
0 replies
2 reposts
18 likes
New York has a uniquely bad track record of electing terrible politicians, in no small part IMO because it is not swing state!
1 replies
0 reposts
19 likes
*taps sign* www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/o...
9 replies
15 reposts
71 likes
CNN poll post debate finds that Harris outperforms every other Democratic contender *including* Biden. www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/p...
16 replies
47 reposts
170 likes
I can't bring myself to read the RFK Jr. piece but it once again demonstrates that Lis Smith is very good at this.
1 replies
1 reposts
8 likes
I see that we are having a second cycle of political stories about dog murder.
2 replies
3 reposts
15 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
i think we should see the Trump v. United States ruling as a group of Republican apparatchiks taking their opportunity to vindicate Nixon and write the unitary executive into the Constitution. www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/o...
44 replies
304 reposts
1134 likes
Biden speaks from a teleprompter and takes no questions. Ok!
1 replies
1 reposts
17 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
This decision is genuinely insane and unsurvivable
6 replies
76 reposts
395 likes
An excellent evidence-based critique of the Cass Report from a group of scientists and researchers out today: law.yale.edu/yls-today/ne...
1 replies
22 reposts
78 likes
It is striking to see which norms the Biden campaign is willing to trash (the Presidential Commission on Debates, the one below) and which are sacrosanct (expanding the Supreme Court or literally doing any small thing other than urge people to vote when the court does something horrifying).
2 replies
18 reposts
74 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
The 14th Amendment says if you were involved in an insurrection you can't be president. SCOTUS said they won't allow anyone to enforce that because of reasons they made up.
The Constitution doesn't say the president is immune from criminal law. SCOTUS decided he is because of reasons they made up.
73 replies
1107 reposts
3703 likes
I said adult lifetime. As a voter.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
Yup. The Constitution includes a narrowly-defined legal immunity for members of Congress in a specific circumstance. Not one word about Presidential or Supreme Court Justice immunity. Those parts were made up out of thin air.
6 replies
90 reposts
326 likes
You don't have to commit a crime to be impeached.
2 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I get the gallows humor of urging Biden to do crimes to stop Trump/SCOTUS etc. But the truth is that if Biden actually committed a serious, obvious crime in office (assassination, for example), I'd bet my bottom dollar he would be impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate with Dem votes.
50 replies
67 reposts
395 likes
The number of replies to this post that game out the actuarial table possibilities for the current justices of the court simply underscores my point. Waiting for people to die is not a solution to a problem this profound.
10 replies
54 reposts
282 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
Chief Justice Roberts decrees the end of DOJ independence in an offhanded sentence on page 20.
52 replies
493 reposts
1262 likes
I know we have a counter majoritarian system. I am familiar with the constitution and our history. I know why this is technically possible. I am asking whether it is tenable to keep thinking of our country as a democracy when it works out like this.
7 replies
37 reposts
458 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
I can’t believe the Supreme Court just ruled that the president can sleep outdoors in a public space.
38 replies
1183 reposts
4577 likes
The thing I can't stop thinking about is this: I'm 48, and in my adult lifetime there has been one Republican who won the popular vote. But I will probably spend the rest of my life under the authority of a Supreme Court dominated by hard right conservatives. How is that democracy?
66 replies
936 reposts
3614 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
From May. www.cnn.com/2024/05/24/p...
2 replies
42 reposts
131 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
Trump after Obama is basically a filled-in swimming pool thing. “Oh, a black president. How about the jerk from Celebrity Apprentice? Not such an august position now.”
3 replies
15 reposts
185 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
The GOP SCOTUS ruling on Presidential immunity, summed up.
33 replies
544 reposts
1941 likes
I happen to think she would do a pretty good job of taking the fight to Trump, who is a dangerous criminal demagogue, and that she is very strong on the Democrats' most powerful issue, abortion. But even if she wasn't she would still be the only plausible option.
1 replies
3 reposts
34 likes
I am not even sure Harris at the top of the ticket helps shore up the sagging Black vote for the Democratic ticket. The main reason to choose her is that of all available options she is the most likely to succeed in easing out Biden. No other scenario is really possible or practicable.
1 replies
0 reposts
18 likes
Identity politics has nothing to do with the case for Kamala Harris to replace Biden. Would it be an ugly thing to shove aside a Black female VP to make room for an untested white or male candidate? Yes. Would it turn off some Black voters? Perhaps. But historically, Black voters are practical.
1 replies
3 reposts
24 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
I'm a hard-eyed realist about electoral politics, that's why I'm advising the Democrats to shove aside the elected vice president and replace her with someone who'd vacate a purple- or red-state Senate seat
7 replies
75 reposts
542 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
me on friday: “none of the strongest candidates are going to participate in a brokered convention”
the pundit class: “of course they will”
the candidates:
www.politico.com/news/magazin...
31 replies
93 reposts
719 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
the most diabolical suggestion i have heard given this reality is Harris/Manchin
86 replies
29 reposts
726 likes
"As of today, March 7, 2024, and for as long as the president and his team are unwilling to break free from complacency, Kamala Harris is a better option than Joe Biden in the general election against Trump." www.ettingermentum.news/p/kamala-now
2 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
I, too, would like to see that Joe Biden. Can someone build a time machine?
3 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
Rejecting immigration is a policy of national suicide and should be treated as such
6 replies
78 reposts
428 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
This essay by Dallek about LBJ's decision not to seek reelection is a fine reminder of the unpredictability of events, which may be history's greatest lesson.
1 replies
22 reposts
109 likes
A primary is a very different beast.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
She polls no worse than Biden, and there is arguably more upside potential for Harris than for Biden at this point.
4 replies
1 reposts
52 likes
No matter what, the Biden campaign has every reason to get Kamala Harris out there and showcase her in the best possible light. For Biden to stay in an win they need Americans to be comfortable with her taking over should he not survive his full term. This is a crucial task post-debate.
18 replies
82 reposts
409 likes
Get back in your coconut tree, Moira.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
The case for Harris in a nutshell. I’m not a big Harris fan but she is not only comfortable on abortion—an issue whose salience Biden has squandered—but she does an excellent job linking abortion and democracy. Plus, she’s the only possible replacement with any claim to democratic legitimacy.
5 replies
16 reposts
149 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
Devastating. www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-de...
22 replies
8 reposts
29 likes
More people voted for the Biden-Harris ticket than any electorate in US history! She was elected by the people for precisely this job!
3 replies
3 reposts
69 likes
Yes, and I think that attacking Harris would play very differently with swing voters than attacking Biden or Hillary Clinton. It certainly helps that there is no email or Hunter story dogging her (to be clear those are BS but useful to Trump).
2 replies
0 reposts
15 likes
Yep. I am not saying she is the perfect candidate in the abstract, just that she is the most likely and legitimate alternative, and has some real strengths that could lead to unexpected upside in this particular race.
1 replies
1 reposts
13 likes
Reposted by Lydia Polgreen
For our book we looked at trouble Harris has had behind the scenes including her own campaign and staff discord. It's a big part of why she's not the one running now. That being said, we also found signs she's hit her stride and drove successful Dem strategy on abortion. bookshop.org/p/books/the-...
4 replies
14 reposts
61 likes