Hochul "paused congestion pricing because it doesn’t poll well. It didn’t poll well before it was instituted in London or Stockholm, either, where it has been solving gridlock, increasing bus ridership and reducing asthma rates. Opinion shifted in those cities after residents saw the benefits."
one of the wildest things about the options here is that there appears to be no option for "It will have no effect, I will travel into Manhattan just as before and NOT pay the fee because I take the fucking train like over 90% of commuters"
Bring back New York leadership of old? Like who, lying deadbeat ass hat Rudy. New York's past success would seem more like an accident than a result of leadership.
This is a bit of a category error. The polls Hochul and House leadership are responding to are not among NYC residents who will benefit, they’re among suburbanites who don’t want to pay NYC taxes in the first place.
The cops who all commute into the city are likely the ones applying the pressure, because of course why would they give a shit about benefiting the community they serve?
Here's a list of other laws that I'm pretty sure didn't poll well before implmentation:
-Seat belt laws
-Emission/car inspection laws
-basically every tax increase that doesn't just target the very rich
Some shit is just the right thing to do and will probably be approved of in the long run.
The Civil Rights acts "didn't poll well." Neither did women voting. You don't do what's right for ALL your people only when you get a majority of public opinion.