Just landed on a Wikipedia page with information that was obviously incorrect and followed the citation link which directed me to ChatGPT generated news garbage. Wikipedia has long been almost impossibly resilient, but LLMs are really reallllly going to strain this resource
I was once a wikipedia writer. One single editor deleted all my work because he thought it was irrelevant. (I’ve never heard of Taylor Swift, can I delete her page now?) So it bothers me that this crap made it on there without scrutiny.
This is why I highly encourage students to follow Wiki’s footnotes. Never quote the Wiki, use it to point you to verifiable sources. The latter you can cite.
I'll add my "me too" story. Over a decade of work, I was the sole author of a topic deeply (and quirky) passionate to me.
But in a whelm, Editors kept randomly:
- deleting photos cause they said it looked copyrighted (nope)
- upped and deleted the whole page as "RTFM"
No more wikipedia for me.
If wikipedia is dedicated to being accurate - and I do believe they are - its a question of when they change their editing policies with regards to AI sources, not if. At the very least, I am only a little worried. Historically wiki ends up doing the right thing.
Wow, imagine the self learning feedback loop that could parent our future. Mr Wiki, may I introduce you to Miss LLM? You could learn a lot from her, and she from you.
Hey Joanne- Jimmy Wales just responded to me on twitter asking which page this was. He wants to get on top of this problem. Can you share the url with us so I can give him that info?