Reposted by Josh Chafetz
No, States Would Not Be Forced to Keep Biden on the Ballot If He’s Not the Democratic Party’s Nominee from the DNC electionlawblog.org?p=144245
1 replies
9 reposts
8 likes
Trump can just periodically issue a blanket pardon for anyone in the military (or, for that matter, anyone in the government) for any acts already committed.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
on the plus side, though, season 3 of Barbecue Showdown drops tomorrow
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
And the president still has the pardon power.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
If the president orders the military to do something and the military declines, then they have picked a side.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
bsky.app/profile/josh...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
5/5 If Biden decides to withdraw, he should just say something like, "Being president is a full-time job. Campaigning for the presidency is a full-time job. I'm too old to work two jobs, so I'm going to focus on the one I was elected to do. Vote Harris in November!"
8 replies
14 reposts
284 likes
4/ Add in the fact that Harris would be the first woman president and only second president of color and it gets scarier. Add in that her replacement would be from the other party and it starts to look like an invitation to assassination attempts.
4 replies
19 reposts
239 likes
3/ We are in a moment of high and rising political violence. ~ 9% of all US presidents have been assassinated, and ~ 13% have been either killed or wounded in an assassination attempt.
4 replies
13 reposts
185 likes
2/ ... confirming a new VP requires majority votes in the House and the Senate.
If there is no VP, then Mike Johnson is next in line to the presidency. I think there's a very good argument that the House would not confirm anyone Harris nominated as VP.
6 replies
36 reposts
291 likes
1/ I'm agnostic as to whether Biden should withdraw from the race. It's a genuinely tough question IMO.
But I have clarity on one thing: He should absolutely not step down as president.
If Harris becomes President, the Vice Presidency is empty. Under the 25th Amendment ...
16 replies
98 reposts
401 likes
I--and I assume colleagues across the country--got an email yesterday from the lawyers behind the suit demanding that we preserve records and emails related to hiring and law-review membership, in anticipation of additional suits against other institutions.
1 replies
4 reposts
11 likes
Awww, thank you!
And, yeah ... a lot of folks in the law schools still clinging to some fairly implausible notions about their chosen field.
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
Reminiscent of how, after 120 years, the first time women and/or people of color won more American Rhodes Scholarships than white men, we were treated to a WSJ editorial about how this was proof that the scholarships were no longer about merit.
0 replies
1 reposts
12 likes
Okay, lovely memes, all, but there's a difference between "I just discovered" and "Most of us don't like to think about X on a regular basis" ...
1 replies
0 reposts
13 likes
One doesn't "choose" to be correct, Evan. One just is.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
But also (d) if you're invested in calling the way judges do politics "law," I don't have much of a beef. If you're invested in the claim that law is something quite distinct from politics, OTOH, I do.
1 replies
0 reposts
12 likes
The answer of course is that (a) they're both politics, but (b) not all politics breaks down on partisan lines, and (c) different institutions do politics differently.
1 replies
1 reposts
10 likes
If you think unanimous decisions in the Supreme Court are proof that it's "law" not "politics," wait till I tell you about the prevalence of unanimous consent in the Senate!
1 replies
4 reposts
33 likes
3/3 Which means, at the end of the day, who the military would support is pretty much at the end of the chain of all governing "what if's".
2 replies
0 reposts
32 likes
2/ Most of us don't like to remember it on a daily basis, but at the end of the day, our legal structures are layered atop the instruments of death, and at base--once everything else runs out--they depend on those instruments for their motivating power.
3 replies
8 reposts
57 likes
1/ At some point every year in teaching Con Law--not just recently but for as long as I've been doing it--some student will play out the thread of "and then what if's" to the point where I say, "Well, it depends on whom the military would support in that situation."
4 replies
18 reposts
104 likes
What a time to be alive!
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
This well-read little buddy was hanging out behind the Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress on my walk into work today!
0 replies
3 reposts
19 likes
This well-read little buddy was hanging out behind the Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress on my walk into work today!
0 replies
3 reposts
19 likes
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Roberts' Court is as powerful as any Supreme Court has ever been. And it has spent the past few years accumulating even more power, as many scholars like @joshchafetz.bsky.social have argued: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... 3/
1 replies
16 reposts
45 likes
Reposted by Josh Chafetz
Whether you agree as to whether this is the most dangerous Court since Taney's (the case @kevinmkruse.bsky.social makes here) there's another key point about the comparison:
Taney's Court had only a fraction of the power and authority over American politics & society that Roberts' Court does 1/
4 replies
60 reposts
169 likes