|
Josh Chafetz@joshchafetz.bsky.social |
Gear up for several years of doctrinal chaos as courts try to figure out how to deal with regs in complex areas that the judges can't possibly understand ...
14 replies 65 reposts 243 likes
|
Silly B Man
@lawnerd.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh it’s easy. Just tune in to Fox News and find out what Rupert Murdoch wants the law to be
0 replies 3 reposts 13 likes
|
E
@fiddledeedum.bsky.social
[ View ] |
everyone is so fucked... trumplandia
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Dan Nexon
@dhnexon.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Doctrinal chaos is the point. Same reason Roberts refuses to offer clear precedent: funnels everything to SCOTUS.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Grumpy Rootbeer
@grumpyrootbeer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think you mean "defer reflexively to industry and capital"
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
3 Dog Dad
@3dogdad.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thought I was in line for small world but somehow found myself on mr. toad's wild ride.
0 replies 3 reposts 8 likes
|
Penguin 🐧😷
@penguin42.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They will lean towards the money.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Dumbstash
@dnlmsstch.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If it's too complex for an expert judge to understand it must be struck down as hopelessly unintelligible
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Project Azar
@projectazar.com
[ View ] |
Quoting Roberts: "Perhaps most fundamentally, Chevron’s presumption is misguided because agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do." Jesus, this will be a bad few years.
0 replies 3 reposts 47 likes
|
Christopher J. Regan
@everydayregan.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The previously-regulated corporations will explain it to them.
1 replies 2 reposts 16 likes
|
Chris Parker
@crs1.bsky.social
[ View ] |
that presumes the decisions will be based in something other than graft, which goes against everything the Roberts court stands for
0 replies 1 reposts 2 likes
|
Peter Navarro, Esq.
@coolspeech.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Originalism AND de novo interpretation of complex regulatory statutes… Goodbye telecommunications and hello carrier pigeons!
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
coreload
@coreload.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What doctrine? We're in "most recent decision wins" territory.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
maraleia
@maraleia.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They aren't scientists for fucks sake.
0 replies 2 reposts 3 likes
|
SlobberHog
@banjofiend.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Gear up for several years of doctrinal chaos as the Fifth Circuit tries to figure out how to deal with regs in complex areas that the judges can't possibly understand since corps always judge shop there. FTFY
0 replies 1 reposts 8 likes