I learned at an engineering conference recently that one crypto mine in TX, 100s of MW, makes more money off ERCOT demand response markets than it does off crypto
repeat: TX ratepayers pay them more to sometimes stop mining than they make by actual mining
just bananas misuse of power markets
🔌💡
Functionally, it’s a more expensive, less direct, environmentally-problematic way to add spinning capacity to a system that was designed around the idea that market incentives would obviate the need for spinning capacity. In other words, they’re arbitraging the inefficiencies of power deregulation.
In this talk Vattenfall in the Nordics outline how some datacentres can be compensated something like *half their own energy costs in a given year* if they can provide between 5 and 20 minutes of relief to the grid 10-20 times a year
I seem to recall consumers getting shafted by variable pricing during demand spikes.
Force non-essential, heavy power draw businesses like crypto (or just crypto specifically) onto variable rate plans. Let them pay. Not the other way around.
In its latest 10Q (September quarter) Riot Platforms shows $51.9M in revenue and $48.6M in “power curtailment credits. s3.amazonaws.com/sec.irpass.c...
My preferred solution would be that loads above a certain MW level would be required to participate in the Day Ahead Market or contract through someone who does it for them. None of this nonsense with DR on large loads.
"Nice grid you've got, there. Be a shame if someone ran it into the ground on a high demand day. Tell you what, pay us and we'll ‘protect’ you from that."
How is this not extortion?
Ummm. This is pretty standard for incompetent GOP regulation/regulatory capture.
If you hate all the little indignities heaped upon you by utilities and corporations, the time wasting, poor service with no recourse, junk fees, etc., the blame is 100% Republicans and their crony capitalism…
The markets are this easy to abuse because they were _made_ that way. The market regulations could have been written to allow ERCOT to do rolling blackouts of large industrial users, but instead they made an abusable market for ERCOT to buy the right to sell less power.
Texas made these rules.
Imagine the roof op solar & storage batteries that could subsidize for low income families. Especially the disabled & elderly that require electric health appliances
This is not a new issue with Bitcoin mining. This scam was built into the “market pricing” system that ERCOT created. The only new thing is the scale of the grift.
The reason Texas invited them was to “use surplus power.” What that does is increase demand and raise the price of power use in off-hours thus raising all Texans’ electric bills. So Texans pay more overall for power thanks to crypto mining and then also pay the miners to stop during high demand.
Electricity markets are not efficient and never will be. Just like healthcare. A market implies free choice, which is only available sometimes in using electricity... and healthcare.
not sure if anyone has reported on this but it's a big story IMO about a big, stupid misuse of ratepayer money to prop up the basically pointless cryprocurrency industry
I think this is incorrect. In Aug '23 they sold a year of ERCOT credits and it's being compared to a single month of mining here. Better to look at the annual financials.
2022 annual report says they got ~$27m in ERCOT creds and mined ~$157m in btc. Spent ~$60m on energy after credits.