This lawyer keeps insisting the Ten Commandments were a very, very important part of the founding but offers zero proof (because there is none)
He finally says, well, Moses is on the SCOTUS building -- built in the 1930s! -- and yes, he's there, but so are Muhammed, Confucious, Hammurabi ....
Wait wait Kevin. Have you read Clarence MF Thomas' opinions about the establishment clause lol.
It's like 1 step above this in how fucking stupid it is, and they are entrenching it into reality one shitty cake baker case at a time.
The "history and tradition" test that this idiot invokes as replacing Lemon is such utter bullshit that I had to shut off the radio. Slavery was present with the founders--does that mean we should still have it?
I have a question.
Why arent the Christians/Evangelicals Ever fucking satisfied?
Nobody is stopping them from going to church, Proselytzing, raising their own kids the way they want.
Why do they have to try to force Their beliefs on US?
Why do WE have to bow to THEM?
Whenever they talk about the US as a Christian nation, ask them "Which denomination?"
Another thing to ask them is "Hey, what can you tell me about the Hundred Years' War?"
Also weird hearing the jackass defending the law in terms of “hey, if we don’t post ‘thou shall not kill’ on every wall the kids might think it’s ok to murder someone!”
As our rabbi once said, those are the no-brainers.
Really is odd that Confucius is there. It would make more sense to have Xunzi (or if one is *really* into laws, maybe Shang Yang). Now given the current court's view of presidential authority, Han Feizi is probably a better choice...
The first three are the worst things you could post in a school as they specifically tell every non-Christian child their beliefs are false and they will burn for them. Then it wraps up with a heavy dose of misogyny to let all the girls know they are just property in the prohibition of coveting.