They want right-wing speech to be protected on campus and people protesting genocide to be ground under. Some people call this hypocrisy, but it's much more sinister than that. These double standards are about HIERARCHY. They're about how the right wants to order the world.
Those kinds of things historically don't work out very well for the people who set that shit up, but the modern Right seems to be all about "Let's speed-run every terrible idea humans ever came up with, and hope something works out differently this time."
It's about who gets to do harm and who harm can be visited upon without consequence. That's what they are outlining when they demand "protection" for some and violence against others. They are outlining the world they want, including who should be victimized at will.
Wilhoit's Law once again
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
Can't be a hypocrite (the GOP runs on hypocrisy) without having or being easily capable of having double standards. (GOP policies and such are all directed to benefiting an elite at the cost of making the majority of peoples' lives worse. Healthcare for an example.)
I would be a lot more sympathetic if just once I would hear the protesters denounce the agitators in their midst, and all the people that cheered and/or excused the rape and murder that precipitated this whole thing. There are a lot of useful idiots on campus.
Yep. It ain't hypocrisy, because what they've always wanted is very consistent. What we think is hypocrisy is just outright lying about what they actually want.
‘When I use a word,’ Humpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.’
’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
H: ‘The question is which is to be Master — that’s all.’
Frank Wilhoit: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." It does explain everything
Yep. There isn’t a lot of intellectual consistency on the right, but the demand for hierarchy is the core motivation for almost everything they do and say.