Peter's avatar

Peter

@notalawyer.bsky.social

the simple way to think about it is that the office of the presidency is a gun. the Court has held that when you become the President, you have an unfettered right to use that gun any way you please. an insane decision.

19 replies 65 reposts 599 likes


Old School Zero's avatar Old School Zero @oldschoolzero.bsky.social
[ View ]

This is of course preceded by Jesse Faden vs FBC, 2019

0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes


Paul Tree's avatar Paul Tree @paultree10.bsky.social
[ View ]

It’s cool how Roberts completely annihilated DoJ independence with a little fun aside, as a treat

1 replies 0 reposts 60 likes


Sweasonable Doubt 's avatar Sweasonable Doubt @thadryanjs.bsky.social
[ View ]

Yeah, but each order is a separate function of the trigger

0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Matt Goldberg's avatar Matt Goldberg @mattgoldberg.bsky.social
[ View ]

Unless you want to cancel student loan payments in which case too bad so sad

1 replies 0 reposts 15 likes


mr. unoriginal's avatar mr. unoriginal @jawnpaulsarte.bsky.social
[ View ]

Seems like the court just restored chevron and gave the executive branch the power to regulate however they see fit

0 replies 0 reposts 8 likes


SimplyPsyke🏳️‍⚧️'s avatar SimplyPsyke🏳️‍⚧️ @simplypsyke.bsky.social
[ View ]

but they won't apply it that way, they'll only apply it when it suits a right wing agenda.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


NicolasRobiodux.bsky.social's avatar NicolasRobiodux.bsky.social @nicolasrobiodux.bsky.social
[ View ]

Supreme Court justices don't kill. Presidents do.

0 replies 1 reposts 1 likes


Chair of the Sewer Maintenance Board's avatar Chair of the Sewer Maintenance Board @sidewalkslam.bsky.social
[ View ]

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Just (Dr.) Monica's avatar Just (Dr.) Monica @pkpd-babe.bsky.social
[ View ]

The court has no oversight, the president can do whatever the president wants, and congress is…tied up by things like the filibuster, the parliamentarian, and centrist Dems who wanna play nice with republicans? 🫠

1 replies 1 reposts 19 likes


Orson Worson's avatar Orson Worson @orsonworson.bsky.social
[ View ]

Any angle for Biden to, say, cancel student debt with this decision?

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


TwoHitGood's avatar TwoHitGood @twohitgood.bsky.social
[ View ]

Sounds like something Biden should act upon.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Keith's avatar Keith @mosheroperandi.bsky.social
[ View ]

Unless you try to point that gun at the former guy (but apparently it's cool to point it at the future guy).

0 replies 0 reposts 8 likes


Ton Chrysoprase's avatar Ton Chrysoprase @tonchrysoprase.bsky.social
[ View ]

You mean you could, like, shoot a democracy on 5th avenue and wouldn’t lose a single SCOTUS vote?

0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes


quietbob's avatar quietbob @quietbob.bsky.social
[ View ]

AND that would be the definition of a criminal! Using the gun as you wish and NOT taking the right OR wrong into account.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Travis Dawry's avatar Travis Dawry @tdawry.bsky.social
[ View ]

Instead of reigning in the use of nuclear weapons they're just extending that power to everything the president does.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Michael Kimbell's avatar Michael Kimbell @shotpoint.bsky.social
[ View ]

dumdum question but there were lots of references to absolute immunity vs “presumptive” immunity in the ruling, what’s the difference?

4 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Eric Baker's avatar Eric Baker @mouseclicker.bsky.social
[ View ]

Does that essentially remove the courts' check on executive power? Could Biden then theoretically do whatever he wants and ignore SCOTUS entirely?

3 replies 0 reposts 8 likes


Odo from the Shire's avatar Odo from the Shire @emphyrio.bsky.social
[ View ]

So what if he wanted to use that “gun” to, like, enforce rules and regulations?

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes