Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
Except, as @mglovesfun.bsky.social points out, in the entirety of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts and his fellow fascism-enablers have declared commanding troops to shoot protestors to be an “official act” that cannot be the basis for criminal prosecution.
2 replies
4 reposts
25 likes
At 5pm in DC, the actual temp will (supposedly) be 98. I don't even want to think about what the "feels like" will actually feel like. 🥵
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Make no mistake about it: if Trump wins, there will be no Mark Esper-like figure at DoD to stop him from ordering that American troops be deployed against protesters with "shoot to kill" orders.
www.cato.org/blog/after-t...
0 replies
2 reposts
1 likes
Feeding the narrative of a tired old man not up to the job anymore is the tired old man himself. Yikes.
www.nytimes.com/2024/07/04/u...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Punchbowl News this morning.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Today, American Democrats are deeply jealous of the UK Labour Party.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
I see a lot of grumbling about the cover being gross, and I get that and wouldn't have done it myself. But I don't think the normie general public shares or would even think about that objection to using a walker as visual shorthand for old age and decline.
Piece is brutal either way, though.
0 replies
1 reposts
0 likes
frequently. But he was also an incredibly vigorous president, despite having been paralyzed by polio.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Brutal.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The police that threaten Trump.
1 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
These guys are traitors to the republic just like their heroes Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee
10 replies
106 reposts
727 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
Just a jaw-dropper from the state whose attorney general is currently trying to execute an innocent man.
innocenceproject.org/missouri-cir...
25 replies
397 reposts
1106 likes
This piece from last week should've got more attention than it did, especially given Trump's most recent comments on wanting to use military tribunals to go after House J6 Select Committee members.
1 replies
2 reposts
3 likes
My bottom line: "The question for the rest of us is this: Should any US president order American troops into the streets with “shoot to kill” orders regarding those peacefully protesting a given administration’s policies, what are supporters of a constitutional republic prepared to do in response? "
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
All of which means a lot of people have for months saw what Robert Hur experienced when her interviewed Biden in the now-closed classified documents case.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
In my experience, Dems rarely take decisive action to staunch political bleeding until its too late.
www.nytimes.com/2024/07/03/u...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
All these centrist Let's Have an Emergency Pageant of Democracy takes fall apart at the slightest contact with outside reality, but this part can't even hold up on its own terms!
2 replies
14 reposts
59 likes
The likely voter number is the one that will cause more House & Senate Dems to publicly call for Biden to withdraw from the race.
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
I've seen some "frontline" Dems say some stupid stuff, but this takes the cake for sheer recklessness & historical amnesia.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Some brief thoughts on the outrage that is the SCOTUS decision in Trump v US.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
This serves three purposes 1) fundraising, 2) base incitement, & 3) news coverage. If he actually attempts something like this, the Option 1776 remains available as a response.
www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/u...
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
🔥
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
Okay, folks, who is putting together the list of the funniest crimes that Biden should be committing between now and election day to highlight the absurdity of today's immunity ruling? Not the stuff like assassinations. Just stuff to make a point.
251 replies
94 reposts
577 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
Fuckin called it
31 replies
147 reposts
714 likes
Just saying.
0 replies
2 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
/8 At any rate, congratulations to the Federalist Society for an achievement beyond the reach of the British, outside the grasp of bloody civil war, impossible to Nazis and Soviets and terrorists: defeating the American idea.
40 replies
894 reposts
2787 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
/7 Justice Roberts smug and superior dismissal of the dissents’ concerns seems to come to us via time warp from some time that never knew Trump. The danger of lawlessness he poses are manifest — he and his followers brag of them. Only a liar or fool would dismiss them.
19 replies
233 reposts
1570 likes
ICYMI.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The Anti-Federalists warned anyone who would listen that creating a overly-powerful chief executive would lead to tyranny. Five of the six Justices that gave presidents sweeping immunity today are all former Exec branch lawyers. Decades of letting Exec power fanatics on the bench brought us here.
0 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
One thing I haven’t seen — does the decision today apply to state criminal charges too? Hard to see how the majority’s crappy reasoning wouldn’t apply. The NY convictions seem pretty distinctly “unofficial” conduct, but the Georgia charges?
9 replies
6 reposts
66 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
"FEAR MONGERING"
-- Roberts, CJ
1 replies
3 reposts
8 likes
Critical background on the Awlaki episode:
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Earlier, @elfprince13.mumak.app recalledthe Obama administration's lethal drone strike on U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki. Was he a bad actor? Yes, but we normally don't execute bad actors w/out due process. Obama did, & today's SCOTUS decision in Trump v US makes such acts vastly more likely.
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
Six months ago, I wrote this scenario based in part on the federal cases against Trump being mooted by events. Now that it's happened, I thought I recirculate this because I believe it remains a viable, terrifying prediction.
www.therepublicsentinel.com/civil-war-20...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
👇
0 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
A difference between me and many of my friends is that most of my friends believe that manners and decorum mean that a person will not participate in fascism. Maybe it is the lesson that my bitter Jewish grandmother taught me, but I've always believed that aristocrats can push us into the ovens.
40 replies
124 reposts
795 likes
Reposted by Patrick G. Eddington
This Originalist™ court has effectively immunized both the president and all federal law enforcement officers from any meaningful accountability.
Because if there are two things the Founders cherished, it's the power of a king-like executive and armed agents of the government to act with impunity.
13 replies
338 reposts
1155 likes
I'll come straight to the core take away from the SCOTUS Trump immunity decision: it makes a violent, anti-Trump uprising far more likely if he wins and takes the SCOTUS decision as a license to use state-sponsored violence at scale against those who oppose him or his policies.
0 replies
1 reposts
2 likes