Ex-public defender now law and policy / criminal justice reform. Leadership in gov’t, tech, and philanthropy.
“It is certain, in any case, that ignorance, allied with power, is the most ferocious enemy justice can have.”
- James Baldwin
Article II Sec. 4 to now should say, “The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction [for unofficial acts as determined by SCOTUS] of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
New from @timcushing.bsky.social — Detroit PD used facial recognition technology and then arrested the wrong people not once, not twice, but three times based on little else than a hit in the system. One of them sued and the settlement mandates new policies: www.techdirt.com/2024/07/03/d...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I ordered two copies today!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I think she revealed her position on cert on page 13 of 13, so easy to do!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Justice Sotomayor did not vote to grant cert in McCrory (bite mark case). She wrote it wasn’t ripe yet for SCOTUS review but urged legislative action to allow for post-conviction review when forensic science changes the validity of the trial’s evidence.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When I was a trial lawyer, my strength lay in gaming out what the prosecution was going to do before even they knew it. That’s the feeling I get watching Heritage. You’re either defining the battlefield or reacting to it. Don’t be the latter, Democrats.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The last couple days have revealed the blissful ignorance that folks have had over how the criminal justice system actually works. Rule 1: protect your own. Facts and laws can are regularly twisted to get to the desired outcome and that has usually resulted in Black and Brown people losing.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This and it’s been in plain sight.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Shit. It’s like we’re waiting for someone else to take action. I’ve been watching @timothysnyder.bsky.social and this is so applicable: youtu.be/9tocssf3w80?...
1 replies
3 reposts
5 likes
We have been since 2000, but attention wanders to our peril.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Offices of electeds are very good at shielding the “annoying” from the principal. The incoming communications are handled by the lowest level staffers and interns. The fax machine is in a closet. Physically showing up is much harder to ignore.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
“Illegally” is doing a lot of work in that paragraph.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I think it’s less about being rushed and more about mutually respecting the little personal space we have in crowded cities.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Walter Katz
At the risk of being tiresome in reposting my own writings on the separation of powers and executive accountability, since prominent scholars are now in the news saying "habeas corpus will still be OK"— Montesquieu's insight was precisely that it won't be.
dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG....
11 replies
77 reposts
210 likes
I have not seen discussion about the parallels between the court-created presidential immunity and qualified immunity for police. The doctrines are not identical but share similarities. However, the effects of QI shielding officers from accountability are clear and do not portend well re: POTUS
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Hold on, are people genuinely surprised that was the outcome or is it the expansiveness of the opinion? I was expecting immunity but not the bright green light for “official acts.”
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
True, but the union protections came about just as real talk about police being held accountable for their actions during the unrest began.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Which dates precisely to the rise of police unions as a response to the unrest of the 1960s.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
That last line in the trailer, “I’m the bad guy?” perfectly sums up his worldview. The defense industry engineer was the prototypical LA juror in the 1990s. My clients generally did not fare well because they were the “bad guy” those jurors despised.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I agree with all of this. While the right was organizing - read the David Brooks interview of Steve Bannon - the Democratic Party was using their out of date playbook. But activist organizing has been focused on particular issues rather than trench building.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Exactly! So please folks, stop with the “I can’t believe they said it out loud” bits. Literally the only objective now is to win in November and a hot take on here will do zilch to change or get out a vote.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Keep going. There is a certain thing about that strata in that they are nice to your face until they feel threatened. Whatever the reason, that type gets super angry with women.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
When all they need to do is thank James Comey every f******* of the year.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This in the latest piece by @marisakabas.bsky.social makes the essential argument that everyone needs to absorb:
“This is an emergency situation where egos and baggage must be put aside in order to serve the ultimate goal of making sure Donald fucking Trump never gets back to The White House.”
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Walter Katz
Beware the temptation to downplay the SCOTUS ruling and to deny its potential implications. We've been down this road before.
8 replies
102 reposts
409 likes
Why does she need “training up” as if she is unqualified now? I assume it’s not intentional, but take a step back and look at what you are saying and how you are saying it.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Walter Katz
frankly, the first defeat that we can hand them, in November, is the easiest possible one we are going to be offered, and we'd be fools not to make it happen.
15 replies
368 reposts
1225 likes
Just stating the facts. It’s far past time for handwringing and time for activism. Get the vote out. Protect the vote. Do whatever is needed to protect democracy.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Three suggestions: 1) stop the infighting now, 2) support the Democratic nominee 100%, 3) put all activist energy into GOTV and election protection. Everything else needs to wait and the campaign itself has to be relentlessly existentialist.
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
It is beyond time to get serious. Stop the handwringing and the doomer hot takes. If it is all on the line, and it does feel like it is, act like it!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
If today doesn’t convince you to stop the handwringing and calling in circular firing squad I don’t know what it will take.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Walter Katz
This is the ball game folks, the authoritarian green light laid out in advance.
Congress will not impeach Trump. And SCOTUS now blesses him with extraordinary latitude to do whatever he wants in power.
A second administration will not be constrained by Congress, the courts, the bureaucracy or law.
27 replies
446 reposts
1063 likes
Thought exercise: treat all of Project 2025 as an official act.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
So, if I read this correctly, Congress is ineffectual in using its impeachment power. Criminal accountability is now an extremely narrow eye of the “unofficial acts” needle. Administrative rule making by experts is no longer valid.
The only check is voters in swing states.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It seems, at first blush, that the Trump v US ruling is a shield against threats by Trump to prosecute President Biden for official acts should he regain the presidency. (That is not to say that is the intent of the ruling.) www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/u...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
You need to read David Brooks’ Steve Bannon interview. Read it to understand, not to tsk tsk how ‘stupid’ populists are. “They look at the noise around Trump and miss the signal of what’s really happening, and they can’t get past that, and they’re blinded by it.” www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/o...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Most accurate statement I’ve seen in a long time: “the best puppets are the worst people.”
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
The right focus: www.inquirer.com/opinion/edit...
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
There’s an angle being played here by Nikki Haley, but I don’t understand it yet. www.wsj.com/politics/ele...
0 replies
1 reposts
0 likes
Right?! And there is way too little understanding of what is occurring right under our eyes. Stop be alarmist, they say. Um…
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Trump’s future prospects has nothing to do with how these are being decided. Narrowing the reach of federal government in particular is the consistent takeaway. If Trump wins, we will see a further divergence between red and blue states with a GOP federal government will punishing liberal states.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
To summarize SCOTUS on criminal law this term:
Can criminalize homelessness (just don’t call it that)
Violently trying to stop Congress is not obstruction.
A wink-wink after the fact gratuity to a state or local elected is not a bribe.
Gun possession restrictions for domestic abusers are ok.
1 replies
2 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Walter Katz
Self-declared king of the United States cannot grasp the distinction between a greenhouse gas and the gas his dentist gave him before a root canal www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2024/06/meet...
3 replies
10 reposts
37 likes
Reposted by Walter Katz
Chevron famously said, "Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of the Government."
Today, Roberts and the other chaos agents on the court say:
"Judges are the only experts in any field, and can dictate policy to either political branch of the Gov't"
16 replies
262 reposts
898 likes
Unfortunately, no. I tried many jury trials and when jurors make a snap judgment, it is very difficult to move them off of that position. A collective intuition that the President is “too old” will similarly be very difficult to overcome. www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/sna...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
This here: “By killing Chevron just one day after undermining agencies’ enforcement actions, the conservative supermajority is kneecapping the administrative state. It shares that goal with Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, and the far-right activists behind Project 2025.”
0 replies
5 reposts
6 likes
I don’t see why Whitmer “needs” foreign policy experience. Carter had none besides being a governor (like Whitmer), Reagan had none, Obama had only 3+ years in Senate
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
“Undecided voters” are annoying, but this is not about what ought to be but what is and the what is is not good:
www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Fun fact - since 1992 only one president has not found himself in a full blown crisis:
Clinton - impeached
Bush - Bush v Gore, 9/11, Iraq
Obama- no drama
Trump - impeached twice
Biden - whatever this is called, but the NYT calling on him to step aside is a crisis.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
That did the trick! Thanks!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes