Adam Serwer@adamserwer.bsky.social |
Nytimes politics desk is just overtly pro Trump at this point. bsky.app/profile/jaco...
24 replies 147 reposts 618 likes
Adam Serwer@adamserwer.bsky.social |
Nytimes politics desk is just overtly pro Trump at this point. bsky.app/profile/jaco...
24 replies 147 reposts 618 likes
Steve Darnall
@stevedarnall.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Not so much journalism as journalism cosplay.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
Billy Wonka
@billywonka.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Pathetic that the @nytimes.com TIMES Editor would allow such BULLSHIT remarks while our Democracy is being DISMANTLED BY THE COURT.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
catladie
@catladie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They're positioning themselves for when Trump wins, apparently. It's so tiresome that no one has guts. Easy to see how one man can take over a whole country ala Hitler.
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
Deborah La Torre
@deblatorre.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I won’t even click on the NYT politics articles anymore. I stick to everything else with my subscription. Ugh.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
@la-crystal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I can't even tell who they think their audience is any more. Surely highly educated people see through their nonsense and less educated people don't even read it.
1 replies 1 reposts 2 likes
Janet Linde
@janetlinde.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Agreed. I don't know if it's a way to bump readership by pretending this is a race of equals or if there's something more sinister behind it. Either way, the bloom is off the rose for NY Times. Struck that one off my reading list a few years ago.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
Bill Kalish
@colorschoolbeat.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Proud to have been a Post carrier. Here to say that if the NYT had comics, it would be a different place.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
@technicalsquirrel.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The truly scary part is when media outlets understand what happens to the ones who don't play ball. They stop trying to oppose the strongman. They start playing along. This may already be starting, but it will deteriorate quickly.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
henry sholar
@mapablue.bsky.social
[ View ] |
neither paper will directly defend democracy agst dictatorship. (they'll operate in the 'darkness' just fine.)
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
BBQdotgov
@bbqdotgov.bsky.social
[ View ] |
All this because Sulzberger's big mad Biden won't do a sitdown interview with his paper
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
Megaweapon
@megaweapon5.bsky.social
[ View ] |
At this point? Been this way at least since 2016.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
Dan Greenberg
@dangco.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This first sentence of the final paragraph of a NYT analysis is simply flabbergasting to me: “The decision doesn’t shield presidents from all consequences. They must still win elections, and Congress can still impeach them.”
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
High Plains Driftwood
@plainsdriftwood.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Christ
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
@green496.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Same as 2016!
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
Paddyboy
@hodag1977.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think NYT sees its mission now as catering to the “elites” - WaPo is hardly better.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
John J
@trianglman.johnnytproductions.com
[ View ] |
"Surely the leopards won't eat my face if I act subservient enough!"
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
Anton J Pierce
@antonjpierce.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Jeebus wept.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
Aisling/Luxe
@somnilux.bsky.social
[ View ] |
How long will it take for liberal folks to understand the NYT is a blatant right wing journal operation, not even centrist? As if their half decade long anti trans crusade isn't evidence enough.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
Michael Clark
@smintheus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
NYT: There are no agreed facts about the Constitution any longer, but our theater criticism is very, very real.
2 replies 0 reposts 27 likes
TruelyEsoteric
@truelyesoteric.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Let's not pretend WaPo is any great source bsky.app/profile/wash...
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
@gpthacker.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I’ve got to stop obsessing over this but don’t the super genius mandarins (ie morons) at the NYT get what happens to them under authoritarianism? WTF? Maybe they’re hoping for ‘merely’ Orban? Which will still suck for them. But what if the get a Putin? A Xi? And if they get a Hitler/Stalin?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
@crimsondynamo4.bsky.social
[ View ] |
How good can that boot leather REALLY taste?
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
Jay Schiavone
@jaytingle.bsky.social
[ View ] |
“At this point,” meaning since AG Sulzberger was given the paper as his birthright.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
OneDishwasher
@onedishwasher.bsky.social
[ View ] |
the extra cowardly thing is that none of their opinion personalities has publicly said they're going to vote for him. Trying to have the cake and eat it too
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes