Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
I’m not a reporter but I did have a blogroll once, so here’s some follow-ups for the former president that seem important: which parts of Project 2025 do you disagree with? Would you appoint anyone to your admin that is supporting it? How do you feel about the “bloodless if the left allows” comment?
8 replies
30 reposts
228 likes
bsky.app/profile/donm...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I'm going to try all caps next time.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I responded to a text request for $ by noting that of course I'll vote for Biden if he's the nominee but that I think it would be best for the country were he to step aside and let Harris run the vigorous race that the moment demands. So that ought to resolve things. You're welcome.
1 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
thehill.com/homenews/cam....
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
bsky.app/profile/jbou...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
bsky.app/profile/seth...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Oh, come on. Do the effing reporting. Links in thread below to well known info. that contradicts the claim that Wash.Post credulously repeats here. Additionally, Trump has a record as President that itself reflects key aspects of Project 2025, especially Schedule F.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
really great that prominent political journalists won’t just say that trump is lying and here’s why
35 replies
305 reposts
1112 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
McEntee for those of you who don’t know is a wildly misogynistic alpha male TikTok influencer who posts on an account called “Date Right Stuff.”
He’s also a failed college quarterback who entered politics through via a Fox News job he got from his industry dad and a viral trick shot YouTube video.
8 replies
55 reposts
159 likes
Just look at the actions of his own administration (particularly schedule F), and at who would serve in a Trump II admin. There is no distance between Trump and Project 2025.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
Just in time for July 4, my colleague Sarah Swan has posted her stunning new paper (forthcoming in Yale Law Journal) on police suing people they are supposed to protect.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
1 replies
34 reposts
60 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
No, States Would Not Be Forced to Keep Biden on the Ballot If He’s Not the Democratic Party’s Nominee from the DNC electionlawblog.org?p=144245
1 replies
11 reposts
11 likes
Agreed. I do think it would be best for Biden to step aside so that Harris can run the vigorous campaign that the moment demands while Biden focuses on the presidency. BUT, I fully agree that most of the media are missing the real story: the would-be dictator and his many powerful enablers.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
An aspiring dictator & convicted felon w history of treason may win the presidency. Profoundly corrupt SCOTUS justices undermined the constitution and gave him immunity from prosecution for past & future crimes. This is all political journalists should be writing about 24/7. We’re at the precipice.
23 replies
198 reposts
659 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
On this July 4, please pause to remember that one of the colonists’ complaints in the Declaration was that the Crown was paying its judges.
10 replies
360 reposts
1204 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
As a constitutional scholar, I am well aware of the serious headwinds and challenges facing the US on the nation's birthday. It will be bad, whatever happens in the Fall elections.
But I also know enough US history that resistance is not futile and we have many historical models of it.
1 replies
24 reposts
90 likes
Happy no more kings day!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Great explainer by Charlie Savage on the roots in the conservative legal movement of the Roberts Court’s executive power rulings. Gift link. www.nytimes.com/2024/07/04/u...
0 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
Constitution: People involved in insurrections should not be President.
Roberts court:...hmm, no, I don't see it.
Constitution:....
Roberts court: but the president should have immunity for crimes
25 replies
412 reposts
1925 likes
Beaver, wanting to know if the news is too upsetting for him to emerge.
0 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
Things are pretty fucked up and the future is uncertain — probably the worst in my lifetime (perhaps excepting 1969 before I can remember). When it’s like that, I like to think about my grandparents and what they faced and got through with the Great Depression and WWII.
/1
25 replies
164 reposts
1046 likes
This is what the SCOTUS immunity ruling, Trump’s authoritarian promises, threats to the electoral system, the multi-pronged attack on universities, and the attack on reproductive rights have in common.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The stakes are crystal clear. They are *telling us* that they will stop at nothing to get their way in every sphere — law, politics, culture, and civil society.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
Either the Democrats will run Biden, or he'll say he can't continue the campaign and Democrats will run Harris. Either is newsworthy, but neither is nearly as radical as running a pro-insurrection convicted felon with legal immunity he's eager to use.
17 replies
297 reposts
1114 likes
I just realized that you posted this six days ago! Still, congrats!! 😊
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
If you hear a voice within you say "you cannot paint", then by all means paint and that voice will be silenced.
1 replies
14 reposts
30 likes
Congrats, Caroline! I will try to read it in time to incorporate it into the Knight piece that I am still finishing!!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
NEW ESSAY!!
The Government Speech Doctrine Ate My Class: First Amendment Capture and Curriculum Bans
The govt speech doctrine makes it almost impossible for teachers to challenge academic gag rules & may preclude student challenges.
It should not.
Please check out this almost finished paper!
2 replies
7 reposts
16 likes
implicitly building in the limitation that only unofficial acts could be prosecuted (which does go beyond Trump's interpretation in the way that J. Sotomayor explained).
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
With the caveat that I haven't looked back at it since Monday, I read it as Sotomayor did. In fact, as I read Part IV, I fumed at Roberts claim to moderation for not going quite as far as Trump, when, in fact, I read his interp. of the impeachment judgment clause as...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
5/5 If Biden decides to withdraw, he should just say something like, "Being president is a full-time job. Campaigning for the presidency is a full-time job. I'm too old to work two jobs, so I'm going to focus on the one I was elected to do. Vote Harris in November!"
9 replies
16 reposts
358 likes
This makes me really miss my old neighborhood!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
0 replies
5 reposts
32 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
The more you read yesterday’s immunity decision, the more appalling it gets. My take:
www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/o...
26 replies
261 reposts
968 likes
This is a perfect demonstration of the utter lawlessness of the Roberts opinion (both the reasoning of the opinion itself and the conduct that it rewards and encourages).
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I suspect he’ll argue that some of the testimony came from his time in the WH and thus couldn’t be used given the truly unhinged Roberts opinion. (The evidence component was the one part on which even Amy Coney Barrett could not get on board, hence her concurrence).
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
now he is seeking a second term knowing that whatever he does, any criminal prosecution will be hung up for literal years in court if it ever gets off the ground in the first place. what do you think he is going to try to do?
7 replies
37 reposts
177 likes
This is a must-read article on how the immunity opinion flies in the face of history and the rule of law
0 replies
5 reposts
12 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
This is the key point I have been trying to make:
2 replies
16 reposts
46 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
SCOTUS: Chevron schmevron. We’re the regulators now.
Political science: Okay fine, here’s some data on redistricting for you to consider.
SCOTUS: Fuck off, nerd www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-...
5 replies
50 reposts
220 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
Folks should read
Jackson Reffitt's puzzlement about how Trump can be immune.
So many judges who presided over Jan6 cases, including some Trump appointees, have talked about accountability for those who duped Jan6ers into throwing their lives away.
www.thedailybeast.com/i-turned-in-...
5 replies
35 reposts
112 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
I really cannot emphasize how catastrophically bad the Court's ruling was. I do my best not to exaggerate about these kinds of things but I am still kind of in shock
55 replies
246 reposts
1599 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
With less of a check on presidential criminality than many of us had been counting on, it becomes all the more important not to elect a brazen criminal to the presidency.
17 replies
111 reposts
639 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
/8 At any rate, congratulations to the Federalist Society for an achievement beyond the reach of the British, outside the grasp of bloody civil war, impossible to Nazis and Soviets and terrorists: defeating the American idea.
40 replies
894 reposts
2787 likes
Promises made, promises kept. 🇺🇸
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Good for you. Being absorbed in a novel is the best.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Heidi Kitrosser
I joke a lot about my capacity for despair, but there's enough Catholic discipline in my youth to remember that it is in fact a sin, one that absorbs all the best in you more comprehensively than a tar pit. I left the church ages ago, but I held onto that cable: despair is not a long-term good.
15 replies
63 reposts
435 likes
sacred. When THEY speak, they damn well better toe the line. 2/2
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
“The law is ours now.” I think that’s a huge part of the message, and explains how Trump and MAGA still claim with a straight face to support law and order. I also see a parallel to MAGA and Trump talk re free speech and civility. The message is: OUR right to say whatever we want is … 1/
1 replies
2 reposts
5 likes