The fact that no electeds last time were punished for trying to steal the election predictably lead to out-in-the-open maneuvering to do the same thing in 2024. It's bad
11 replies
45 reposts
334 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
the times continues its vigorous campaign to end democracy. literally the same playbook they ran in 2016 with the emails.
we're so fucked. i'm existentially depressed.
35 replies
131 reposts
730 likes
<<Taps sign>> Any time an elected official makes a public statement the intended audience is their voters.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
This is performative centrism from a vulnerable Democrat looking to win reelection in a purple district. No more, no less.
www.bangordailynews.com/2024/07/02/o...
1 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
I believe he is appealing the conviction. And who the fuck knows what SCOTUS would do at this point? "Supreme Court rules 6-3 that only Republicans may appear on the ballot." Sure? Why not?
0 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
On the one hand, FUUUUUUUUUUCK.
On the other hand, facing sentencing for 34 felony convictions right when election season is shifting into high gear is not going to help Trump.
3 replies
1 reposts
13 likes
bsky.app/profile/josh...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The full quote gives a very different message. bsky.app/profile/josh...
0 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
If it's Harris, I'm all in. If it stays Biden, I'm all in. Just let me know.
1 replies
3 reposts
34 likes
Y'all keep litigating the Democratic ticket; I think I'm gonna sit it out. At the end of the day I really don't care who's on it: Biden, Harris, Whitmer, Newsom, James Van Der Beek, a rotting corpse, a hairless cat, a bag of broken glass. I will canvass for any of them to try to preserve democracy.
4 replies
6 reposts
39 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
Trump committed these crimes as a private citizen, prior to becoming president. This is ridiculous.
8 replies
19 reposts
83 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
25 replies
734 reposts
2865 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration at all to say the decision threatens the Republic. I might not have said so in 2015, before I saw how triumphantly lawless and autocratic the President could be, and how so many people would applaud it or at least shrug.
42 replies
496 reposts
1690 likes
The two things that immediately come to mind are allowing Garland take his time with the Trump case and failing to put specific, actionable items on the agenda through his rhetoric.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
He's not a wartime consigliere.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I'm in general pretty pro-Biden but it's very possible his most important legacy is going to be completely failing to understand the threat the Republican party faces to democracy.
4 replies
2 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
There are two elements to the immunity decision that are particularly extreme in a way that many will miss: (1) motive is irrelevant and (2) immune acts are not just excluded from prosecution, they’re excluded from evidence.
/1
50 replies
900 reposts
2424 likes
It's all on the table. Everything the executive branch does, from soup to nuts.
1 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
One of the cool things about this new Supreme Court ruling is that since you take bribes in exchange for "official acts" pretty much by definition, the president is now free to take bribes! I wonder if that's something Donald Trump might take advantage of.
3 replies
25 reposts
95 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
We can save the country by electing a Democrat in Nov. But not Joe Biden. And his replacement has to be exactly who I have in mind---definitely not anyone else. Why is everyone so stupid and not following my easy plan?
8 replies
8 reposts
71 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
The electoral problem has become, as the IRA gloated to Thatcher, that the GOP only needs to get lucky once and the Democrats need to be lucky forever.
Either they’re going to do something about the court - now, not eventually - or we will simply play iterations of this game until the GOP wins.
17 replies
267 reposts
876 likes
I posted this on 1/6. It still applies, and I have a feeling I'll be taking it out a few more times before it's all said and done.
1 replies
5 reposts
16 likes
Reposted by Jeff Lazarus
Yeah, it’s not just that he consistently dismisses very valid criticism of his insane opinions; it’s that he does it with a wholly unwarranted sneer of condescension.
13 replies
59 reposts
396 likes