Why read past headlines: If you wonder why Trump and his cronies say terrible things out loud that should turn off swing voters, this article explains it.
But it's a high-risk/high-reward fascist strategy. With Project 2025, it may be backfiring.
www.salon.com/2024/07/05/p...
2 replies
12 reposts
58 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
This entire conversation is the most irrational, burn-the-house-down political response I’ve ever seen. And I was here for the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago.
1 replies
2 reposts
24 likes
This is the kind of game where confidence, commitment, and loyalty are force multipliers. Acting out of fear that other people don't believe in you is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Be the change you want to see in the MSM. Please. We're not dispassionate observers. We're participants, all of us.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Anyone stepping into his place without an ironclad, pre established demonstration of being *more* popular, charismatic, and universally loved than him will carry the permanent stink of a desperate second choice. The media frenzy will intensify and stay there.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Politics is about confidence and unity. Any form or version of Joe Biden not being the nominee shatters both of those things in an unrecoverable way. Joe Biden resigning is a confession of guilt by the entire party of our own dishonesty and incompetence, as a party, in vouching for his fitness.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
A lot of the more extreme suggestions here about what Joe Biden might do about any number of problems RN lead more or less directly to either SCOTUS-driven catastrophic intervention, reversal, and collapse, or to hot civil war. That's why they're bad ideas, even as a fan of playing hardball (me)
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
This is why most political professionals have made only the smallest of changes to their forecast of an extremely close election. One can google Larry Sabato for an example of this, and the others are all the same.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
It's completely within historical precedent for candidates to have bad media waves in a campaign, based on gaffes, bad events, or w/e, and then recover and win. In elections with close polling, it is utterly normal. An incredibly broad swathe of people have succumbed to recent panic.
1 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
I've never wanted to cancel my NYT subscription more than I do today.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
Yellow journalism. Really, if you're mad at anyone other than the oligarchy of elites here, I don't know what to tell you.
2 replies
3 reposts
33 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
Trump gritting through the pussy tape is illustrative here. He refused to drop out & a few weeks later his polls rebounded & the press just dropped it. Obviously the fact that the press likes fascism & wants it to win is a factor but the fact it didn't change anything was EMBARRASSING for them.
8 replies
16 reposts
83 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
I think it is wise and productive for people to take seriously the idea we are in a constitutional crisis in America. I don’t think it is wise or productive to assume what happens next is like what happens in semi consolidated or consolidated authoritarian systems.
4 replies
23 reposts
106 likes
Yes, but also, any such effort would require Republican cooperation, which is a pipe dream.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
It's important to note that this single-post analysis above is entirely consistent with a much more comprehensive analysis by @ketanjoshi.co showing that changes in the X algorithm and moderation policies that began in Oct 2022 have massively favoured trolls and penalized climate scientists.
See:
14 replies
196 reposts
695 likes
I haven't heard other experts talk about what a baseline Roberts court ruling on presidential immunity would have looked like in a non-Trump world. I'm with everyone else in horror, but the possibility that this is fairly close to their pre-Trump opinions anyway has occurred to me. Any thoughts?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
"Under today's ruling, a President would be immune for any way in which he used the military (a "core function"), even to kill American citizens in America. ..." bsky.app/profile/mitc...
0 replies
3 reposts
16 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
There are two elements to the immunity decision that are particularly extreme in a way that many will miss: (1) motive is irrelevant and (2) immune acts are not just excluded from prosecution, they’re excluded from evidence.
/1
50 replies
906 reposts
2442 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
frankly, the first defeat that we can hand them, in November, is the easiest possible one we are going to be offered, and we'd be fools not to make it happen.
15 replies
371 reposts
1231 likes
Reposted by jordanw2382.bsky.social
Under today’s immunity decision, Biden could order AG Garland to immediately prosecute Thomas and Alito for corruption and insurrection. (Official act). If Garland refuses, Biden can fire him and replace him with someone who will. (Official act) I would suggest Elie Mystal.
33 replies
286 reposts
1185 likes
You seem like a good person and more resilient than you think 🤝
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Ain't it funny how many invisible people came out of the woods here to invalidate this seemingly reasonable take? It's like a lot. I am also in the 'best president of my lifetime' camp tho also the 'tragically not even close to good enough to save us' camp
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yep
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes