Tom Scocca's avatar

Tom Scocca

@tomscocca.bsky.social

One editor persistently asking "Did that happen, though?" would leave the Wall Street Journal opinion section a clean soothing expanse of blank paper

14 replies 217 reposts 1186 likes


Mario's avatar Mario @dmario.bsky.social
[ View ]

I agree with you 100%.
But there's actually a pretty famous recent example they could have used! An entire DA race run on prosecuting Bill Cosby.

whyy.org/articles/aft...

The losing "I won't prosecute" candidate later served on Trump's legal team for a while.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Ozma's avatar Ozma @rowyourbot.bsky.social
[ View ]

Noah whathisface…Noah Smith says it happened in his substack. But it didn’t happen, did it?

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jo_clever_ke's avatar Jo_clever_ke @insidejoke.bsky.social
[ View ]

They have to say Prosecutor specifically in the hypothetical, which they intend to be misread as a factual, because otherwise it would be calling out Trump.

1 replies 1 reposts 18 likes


McGuffin's avatar McGuffin @hitchkitty.bsky.social
[ View ]

See also "cool story, bro".

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Andrew Jackson Lynch's avatar Andrew Jackson Lynch @whatsforlynch.bsky.social
[ View ]

You can tell it didn't happen, because it wouldn't be necessary to do that cutesy "Mr. X" nonsense if it had.

0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Madness Table's avatar Madness Table @rollforphobia.bsky.social
[ View ]

Enforcing laws that only the wealthy even have the option to break is discriminatory. WSJ call me.

0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Ni en pedo's avatar Ni en pedo @300ps.bsky.social
[ View ]

Dude don't ruin our Vibes section

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Benny Six Cats's avatar Benny Six Cats @teeveeben.bsky.social
[ View ]

What if every time Peggy Noon invents a New Yorker she kayfabe met on the subway or at a deli, in some distant universe, that imaginary figment is made manifest. A whole multiversal NYC, populated by millions of living fake anecdotes where Noonan is their oblivious and ambivalent god-creator.

0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes


Nick S's avatar Nick S @holgate.permanent.red
[ View ]

The purpose of the WSJ opinion section is to be always wrong so that if you ever find yourself agreeing with it you know that your thinking took a bad turn.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Wudang96 💜🌻's avatar Wudang96 💜🌻 @wudang96.bsky.social
[ View ]

"Hypothetically of course* has to be removed from acceptable rationale for publishing and promoting lies. Great classroom exercise and a really good strategy for promoting disinformation.

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


ProzacElf's avatar ProzacElf @prozacelf.bsky.social
[ View ]

Well I mean who wants to deal with a defamation suit from Professor X? Obviously you have to blame the anonymous Mr X

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Joe Gannon's avatar Joe Gannon @jmgannon.bsky.social
[ View ]

1 replies 1 reposts 3 likes


onekade's avatar onekade @onekade.bsky.social
[ View ]

The WSJ opinion page loves it when prosecutors run on a promise to lock up more poor people for doing poor people crimes.

0 replies 0 reposts 10 likes


jody's avatar jody @jodyshenn.bsky.social
[ View ]

Technically, many of them are editors, so they could ask, get “probably” and then just go ahead and print. They probably do stuff like that all the time.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes