on the very day the Supreme Court's conservatives said 'we know best' and put themselves in charge of complicated agency decisions one of the geniuses confused nitrous oxide and nitrogen oxide. So they had to have a do over. Not exactly an auspicious start.
www.forbes.com/sites/alison...
43 replies
566 reposts
1442 likes
The other candidate is slightly older (& proven fit for the job by doing it well) & a complete institutionalist, no danger to our Constitution.
IT IS YOUR GODDAMN JOB TO DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO DEFEAT TRUMP AND THE GOP.
See: Project 2025 www.project2025.org
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
You can’t bothsides this. You have one (completely unfit, & growing more so every day) candidate who is promising to be a dictator, to take revenge against everyone who has gotten under his very thin skin, to use the DoJ against his perceived enemies.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by VCarlson
59 years ago today, Griswold v. Connecticut guaranteed the right to birth control.
Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should "reconsider" that ruling.
And this week, 38 GOP senators voted against the Right to Contraception Act.
Republicans are coming for birth control.
19 replies
408 reposts
800 likes
“Just keep them in your garden.”
By which I deduce you’ve never had/known a cat.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Regardless of their possible effect on local wildlife, it’s better for the cat to be strictly indoors. Less likely to encounter: other animals that would kill them, cars, random sickos, and traps - deliberate or otherwise. Not to mention poisons and pathogens.
2 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Someone who looks the part, but has no charisma.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
But, sure, it’s all Hillary’s fault.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The orange shitgibbon cheated every way he could (got found guilty for some of it), took help from Russia (getting help from hostile foreign govts is a GOP thing, see St Ronnie), benefitted from the media’s hatred of uppity women AND their belief that clown couldn’t get elected, so what’s the harm?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I haven’t read the article yet. I hope it begins with “Republicans pressed forward despite the absence of any evidence that Mr. Mayorkas has committed high crimes and misdemeanors, the constitutional threshold for impeachment.” And ends quickly thereafter.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
Reposted by VCarlson
Here. It's not hard: "Republicans pressed forward despite the absence of any evidence that Mr. Mayorkas has committed high crimes and misdemeanors, the constitutional threshold for impeachment."
4 replies
53 reposts
176 likes
Reposted by VCarlson
Again, if you're a journalist and don't explain that the House GOP decided to trump up an evidence-free impeachment against an immigrant Jew to appease the base -- hang it up.
9 replies
153 reposts
509 likes
They must have updated. All the links I tried went where they seemed to be aimed.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I thought it was a heartbreaking song when I first heard it in 1988 (& bought the album because of it). It’s a wonderful song, and I love it, but it’s not happy.
Of course, I also thought the ending of El Norte (1983) was heartbreaking, though the guy I saw it with disagreed.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Mom made a lamb roast for my stepdad once, with the top of the roast pretty much solid garlic cloves. He loved the garlic-infused meat, AND ate all the lovely baked garlic cloves. She said he exuded garlic, and couldn’t stay too close to him for about a week.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes