One of my most Boomer opinions is that the word "gifted" or "gift" as a verb sucks and is bad. Just say "given" or "give". You sound like you are trying to be fancy but it is just clunky.
Yeah why did the word “gifted” replace “give”? “She gifted it to me” sounds so pretentious. It sounds like a legal disclaimer where you have to verbally confirm that it was a gift for tax purposes.
I'm guessing it snuck into the language through "regifted," which is still clunky and bad but at least serves a very specific purpose where "regiven" wouldn't be as immediately obvious
we already have the phrase "given as a gift" too, in case they need to specify it wasn't given in exchange or under duress! i hate that instagram caption speak
My similarly boomer opinion is that the modern use of "speak to" should be banned in civilized company. As in "This thread speaks to my dislike of "gift" as a verb".
I shared your position till a few months ago when I was told that a) it distinguishes between giving as a gift versus simply passing something b) I learned that this is the difference between regalar and dar in Spanish & c) the usage actually goes back centuries
I blame MBAs. Clear and concise language is the enemy when you don't have any actual ideas. Then the Bigger Is Better attitude toward words leaked out of business schools and became aspirational.
I kinda hate it too, but it has the benefit of specificity. If I give someone a hammer, it is uncertain whether it changed ownership or I just gave it to them to use on a nail and expect its return. If you gift someone a hammer there is no doubt. Also "gave someone a hammer as a gift" is also clunky
Oh no, is this the part where I offend the Brits and share that I also hate whilst, amongst and and other similar "st" words. Those extra letters cost money!