My first read: If a president commits crimes unrelated to him being the most powerful person in the world, he can be prosecuted. But if explicitly uses his powers to commit crimes, he is at least presumptively, and probably absolutely immune from prosecution.
I mean, holy shit.
A sitting President running for a 2nd term has two separate jobs: President and candidate. His acts as a candidate cannot be “official” so asking Brad Raffensperger to find votes “we need” cannot fall under the immunity umbrella. If it does, nothing means anything.
Here’s mine: The Constitution permits a president to commit any crime, or direct others to commit crimes, and erase any repercussions by simply using the power of the pardon.
You cannot even impeach and convict him. He can have would-be convict-ers killed and their killers pardoned.
It’s worse than that. He can conspire with the Attorney General or *any other* federal official to commit crimes *completely unrelated to his official duties* and those conversations cannot be investigated by prosecutors or used as evidence.
Also you cannot use evidence to prove if an act is official or unofficial, and since it's all presumed official, good fucking luck trying to stop the god-emperor.