There's something that everyone gets wrong about the Ashley Madison data dump from 2015. And I should know, because I was one of the reporters who broke the story. It's my latest for @newscientist@mstdn.social (sign up for a free account to read). www.newscientist.com/article/mg26...
I happened to be working out of the Gawker offices when that story came about & I remember thinking even then as you were publishing things from it (and eventually we were, too) that people were/were going to miss what the real story was there, & it seems I was sadly right
I know — my ability to go into detail on this is EXTREMELY limited, but oh well — a real woman who was ingenuously on that site and her experience was VERY funny, especially around when your story broke
Presumably that aspect got less traction as men (and possibly their wives) prefer the “man is cheater” narrative to “man turns out to be quite embarrassingly horny-stupid”?
I mean, you’re a state senator caught up in this. Which mistake do you want to ‘fess up to?
I thought it was so weird how little the recent documentary got into the whole bot story. Wonder if that was maybe a condition of some very candid interviews with some of the AM principals.
In "The Screwfly Solution," Alice Sheldon posited an alien species using pheromonal control to get men to murder most women and cause a population collapse in a generation or two.
Isn't it comforting to know that techbros have found a more humane way to monetize male loneliness purely for profit?
So Ashley Madison was basically a big phone sex "call center" (a'la Girl 6), but online? 🤯
It just hit me how these centers were the precursors to today's Myanmar/Chinese gang pig butchering scams. Wow.