If you live in a state that can pass laws to fill out the gaps, it might be manageable but reading this? It seems the federal executive and legislative branches just lost most of their powers no matter who is in charge.
If ever there were any doubt left that stare decisis no longer holds for this court and likely the foreseeable future this should end that debate. Scouts is now officially a political animal and the Democrats have to recognize that and act accordingly.
I look forward to having new pharmaceuticals and nuclear power plant regulations be crafted by a joint Congressional committee consisting of Lauren Boebert, Tommy Tuberville and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Precedent is dead, rendering this opinion (like their other opinions) a meritless wisp of advisory bullshit.
The agencies should ignore this opinion and amplify their enforcement until a future court agrees with them. This is the method previously endorsed by the Roberts court.
The court has set up the framework for corporations bribing judges to strike down regulations they dislike, as long as the reward comes after the favor.
The silver lining is....OH WHO AM I KIDDING! There IS no silver lining, the best thing to do is put ourselves out of our misery.
Is the general reactions I am seeing on here.
Roberts has the opinion overruling the 1984 case setting forth a standard in which courts give federal agencies deference to their reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws. The decision gives more power to the courts to strike down agency actions. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
