More anti-democratic thoughts from 2018 the NYT allowed this writer to exclude from his current piece. Delivered with an air of detached irony, as if he miiight be joking or exaggerating. But is he?
I like how whoever wrote that confused absolute power with absence of politics. Nothing could be further from the truth. Absolute power just makes politics deadlier to *everyone*, even those happy resigned folks the piece referred to
Found this tweet of his.
The NYT thinks this guy is worth printing on the Fourth of July - the birth of American independence - telling people not to vote.
Surprise surprise he's a far right tradcath extreme homophobe!
As a reasonably well informed person who votes & has relevant opinions on politics... why hasn't the NYT ever asked me for an interview? Do I not hang out at the right Nathan's hot dog shop located right around the corner from their offices? How do they constantly find the worst/dumbest people?
The NYT also allowed him to exclude his partisan inclinations. From the 2018 piece: "In a bland way I hope to see Republicans control various state and national offices. This arises from a single issue: the legality of abortion."
Except... history is FULL of uprisings, revolts, rebellions, civil wars, and other forms of regime change. The elite, knowing they were outnumbered, had to pay at least some heed to not pissing off the masses to such a degree that said masses would decide "Better death than this!"
Pretty sure the fascist aristocrat-capitalist-owned NYT only hires writers who are trained to display this type of fealty on command. They keep a little bell in their hiring office and at the sound of its ring, potential hires must stand and scream "I AM HUMAN FILTH! RULE ME!! RULE ME!!!!!"
That’s pretty reminiscent of Robert Filmer’s Patriarcha (1680), which defends the divine right of kings with a paternalistic fantasy of social harmony under absolutist governance.
This country was literally built on Locke’s refutation of that argument.
No, this is written in the same style as my catholic school theology textbooks. This is absolutely the writing of someone who read Leviathan and liked what he saw
I'm at the point where it would take new evidence for me to think the billionaires who own the news aren't trying to secure themselves another trillion dollar tax break to spend on stock buybacks.
Not only is this guy an asshole, he’s also wrong: many, many pre-modern regimes were very unstable and changed frequently. The difference is this change would come from civil wars between rival elite factions, wars that reliably immiserated the population