"It marks the second incident in two months involving a Tesla’s near miss-with a train while utilising its driver assistance system."
You can tell Tesla is close to "solving self-driving" because they are down to the tough edge cases like *checks notes* trains
nz.news.yahoo.com/tesla-autopi...
27 replies
157 reposts
668 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan
Supreme Court gives Joe Biden the legal OK to assassinate Donald Trump
32 replies
126 reposts
543 likes
This is a short, clear, and insightful paper about the perils, hopes, and (especially) hype around applications of CRISPR therapy to trans folx. Well worth reading..
0 replies
1 reposts
11 likes
Ooh! That's a very good paper. The last section and the conclusion are spot on!
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Yes. Authoritarian regimes have imperfect information and finite resources, so it's good not to make oneself into one of their low-hanging fruit.
0 replies
2 reposts
29 likes
"Light from Uncommon Stars" by @rykaaoki.bsky.social
"The City We Became" by @nkjemisin.bsky.social
"Summer Fun" by @jeannethornton.bsky.social
"One Last Stop" by Casey McQuiston
"Too Like the Lightning" by @adapalmer.bsky.social
"A Long Way to a Small Angry Planet" by Becky Chambers
0 replies
1 reposts
5 likes
AI is not the only thing ripping off artists.
The Louvre copied the 2017 participatory dance piece, "Museum Workout" by Monica Bill Barnes and Robbie Saenz de Viteri, and neither paid the original choreographers nor gave them credit.
www.monicabillbarnes.com/blog/museum-...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
**Anne** Gorsuch
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
In 1981 Ann Gorsuch said, "The EPA will defer to Chevron" and in 1984 SCOTUS said, "The courts will defer to EPA's deference to Chevron."
But Dems took over EPA, and Neil G. whined, "EPA isn't deferring to Chevron the way mommy used to," so his court bros took pity and killed deference to EPA.
1 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
In 1981 Ann Gorsuch said, "The EPA will defer to Chevron" and in 1984 SCOTUS said, "The courts will defer to EPA's deference to Chevron."
But Dems took over EPA, and Neil G. whined, "EPA isn't deferring to Chevron the way mommy used to," so his court bros took pity and killed deference to EPA.
1 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan
I like naming non-pathologized benefits trans kids get from this care. Less about decreasing depression/anxiety/suicidality; more about building friendships, healthier family relationships, more focus in school, more ambition, planning for their future. All of which is true!
1 replies
7 reposts
120 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan
A point I've started using lately is the fact so many families I speak to are leaving the only homes their kids have ever known to ensure their trans kid can maintain access to hormones or blockers. Do you really think they're doing that for anything short of essential for their child's well-being?
2 replies
85 reposts
437 likes
SCOTUS overturning Chevron is getting lots of attention, but I expect SEC v. Jarkesy will have a more destructive effect on regulation.
If it takes a jury trial every time the EPA fines a polluter, every time OSHA fines an employer for an unsafe workplace, etc., regulation will be strangled.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan
On the same morning, the Court said:
1) We should not presume to know more than small town mayors regarding complex, technical questions like whether to arrest people for being poor.
2) I don't see why a "PhD" in "nuclear physics" should have any latitude to implement ambiguous energy rules.
6 replies
249 reposts
677 likes
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
"above all else, stare decisis is a “doctrine of judicial
modesty.” ... In that, it shares something im-
portant with Chevron. Both tell judges that they do not
know everything.... So today, the majority rejects what judicial humility counsels not just once but twice over." --- Id at 25
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The majority "insists that 'agencies have no special compe-
tence' in filling gaps or resolving ambiguities in regulatory
statutes; rather, '[c]ourts do.' Ante, at 23. Score one for
self-confidence; maybe not so high for self-reflection or
-knowledge." --- Id. at 13
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
"If opinions had titles, a good candidate for today's would be Hubris Squared" --- Loper Bright v. Raimondo No 22-451 (slip op.) (June 28, 2024) at 3 (Kagan, J., dissenting, on the obliteration of Chevron).
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes