Jonathan Gilligan's avatar

Jonathan Gilligan

@jgilligan.org

513 followers 684 following 743 posts

Integrating social & natural sciences & modeling to study impacts & responses to climate change | They/them 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ NB | Trans people are who we say we are | jonathangilligan.org


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Too many people analyze the campaign in terms of what they WISH the public cared about, rather than what the public DOES care about. The only way to win is to connect with the public on the things it DOES care about and persuade them you're eager and able to address their concerns.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

There's been far too much attention on the debate & too little on the months leading up to the debate. During those months, Trump has consistently led Biden in polls. The issue isn't whether Biden's old or what pundits write. It's why his campaign can't move public opinion in his favor.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Moira Donegan's avatar Moira Donegan @moiradonegan.bsky.social
[ View ]

#Metoo ruined lives: the women’s. For the summer issue of Bookforum, I wrote about Christine Blasey Ford’s memoir “One Way Back,” the aftermath of disclosure, and what it means to be a public survivor when storytelling has proven futile. www.bookforum.com/culture/disp...

7 replies 162 reposts 606 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Lots of firms, such as YouGov abandoned telephone sampling long, long ago.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Asawin Suebsaeng's avatar Asawin Suebsaeng @swin24.bsky.social
[ View ]

For most of its history, America hasn’t been a democracy, by any meaningful definition of the term! This isn’t some It Can’t Happen Here shit, in a way, it’s already happened. It just may not have directly affected you.

12 replies 92 reposts 524 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

🏳️‍⚧️ Millennial Horniness is Not a Crime's avatar 🏳️‍⚧️ Millennial Horniness is Not a Crime @josie.zone
[ View ]

The attempt to get radical leftists to engage with politics as it is lived is actually mostly a struggle to get them to not prefer a glorious suicide over a frustrated life

6 replies 39 reposts 209 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

🏳️‍⚧️ Millennial Horniness is Not a Crime's avatar 🏳️‍⚧️ Millennial Horniness is Not a Crime @josie.zone
[ View ]

Accelerationism is just nihilism masquerading as idealism

17 replies 86 reposts 332 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

CHOAM Nomsky 💭's avatar CHOAM Nomsky 💭 @thielman.bsky.social
[ View ]

yes, we boiled the planet, but it was worth it to make a machine that, instead of adding two plus two, takes the statistical average of every answer to questions containing "what" "is" "two" and "plus" from a database of illegal cell phone transcripts and returns a fake nude pic of a high schooler

24 replies 912 reposts 3117 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

In science and engineering fields, "anti-nepotism" rules against both members of a couple working for the same firm were often used as excuses to discriminate against women.

1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

A large number of Washington Post articles save as web pages without metadata such as authors or date. I've posted on Zotero forums.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

The key distinction is egalitarian respect for people's own preferred pronouns versus titles bestowed by government to advance a political agenda by indicating that some people are superior to others.

0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

He got his title for prosecuting nonviolent protesters whilst declining to prosecute cops who shot unarmed civilians and government operatives who tortured people. Not something I'm inclined to respect.

1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Costa Samaras's avatar Costa Samaras @costasamaras.bsky.social
[ View ]

Put this on the front page for a month. It’s that serious and that dangerous.

2 replies 43 reposts 77 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

My library card.

2 replies 2 reposts 9 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Prof. Farhana Sultana's avatar Prof. Farhana Sultana @farhana.bsky.social
[ View ]

Saleem was a lifelong collaborator, mentor, colleague, friend. I’ve known him since 1997. The keynote lecture I delivered at the Royal Geographical Society this past week has video clips of interviews with him (and others). Video of my lecture & the panel discussion afterwards is here:

4 replies 13 reposts 22 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Prof. Kevin J. Kircher's avatar Prof. Kevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com
[ View ]

"In 2023, Google’s carbon intensity climbed to 11.4 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per million dollars of revenue. That’s up 101% since 2019, and up nearly 25% since 2022." Microsoft's "increased by 20% since 2022."

1 replies 8 reposts 16 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

So much for Full Self Walking™

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

The most harmful thing she did wasn't her refusal to resign. It was all the years she worked hard to shut down opposition to the court's right-wing partisanship by insisting over and over that the court was completely apolitical.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Agreed. But to understand her, we should remember that she adamantly insisted that the court was not partisan, so she thought it didn't matter at all whether her successor was appointed by a Democrat or a Republican. She was upset about the Democrats who voted against confirming Roberts in 2005.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Democratic majority? The court hasn't had a democratic majority since 1969.

2 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Yes. It will generate entries directly from DOI, PMID, ISBN, and other standardized literature identifiers, but not URLs.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

I use Zotero all the time. It does great with academic articles, but poorly with most online newspaper articles (it enters them as web sites, and often misses a lot of important information, such as the authors), so it takes a lot of manual editing for each news entry.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

The part about the risks of the daydreams is the most important part.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Michael Hobbes's avatar Michael Hobbes @michaelhobbes.bsky.social
[ View ]

I think what makes this difficult to discuss with any kind of rigor is that Biden staying in is bad and Biden dropping out is also bad! There are no good options available so we’re all flailing to figure out which bad thing is gonna be like 15% better than the worse thing

18 replies 38 reposts 427 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

My rep voted not to accept the electoral college results in 2021 and he signed onto an amicus brief to the Supreme Court supporting overturning the result from Pennsylvania, so nah, the only impeachment he'd support would be of Biden.

0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Anne Fausto-Sterling's avatar Anne Fausto-Sterling @birdlady.bsky.social
[ View ]

Public two-day NIH symposium - Exploring the many dimensions of sex and gender in the genomics era: Clarifying complexities in light of social and genomic advances.
Looks like a great lineup (well, yes. It includes me, but the others are really terrific). #QueerSTEM
www.genome.gov/event-calend...

0 replies 15 reposts 36 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Kashana's avatar Kashana @kashana.bsky.social
[ View ]

Everybody freaking out about extrajudicial killings is going to lose it when they find out about the existence of cops.

36 replies 588 reposts 3128 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Steve Silberman's avatar Steve Silberman @stevesilberman.bsky.social
[ View ]

This is one of the most dystopian signs I've ever seen. Republicans are quickly turning this country into an unrecognizable freakshow.

113 replies 786 reposts 1914 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

They would be unlawful orders, just like Trump telling Pence not to certify Biden's victory. The military could refuse them or not, but either way, the president could not be prosecuted for giving unlawful orders. And he could pardon troops for following unlawful orders.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

e.w. niedermeyer's avatar e.w. niedermeyer @niedermeyer.io
[ View ]

it's important to not give into despair, and instead to look at the upside: for the next four months it is entirely legal to bribe the president to send seal team six into the supreme court building with official orders to do the funniest possible thing, as long as you pay him after the deed is done

4 replies 32 reposts 186 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

e.w. niedermeyer's avatar e.w. niedermeyer @niedermeyer.io
[ View ]

"It marks the second incident in two months involving a Tesla’s near miss-with a train while utilising its driver assistance system."

You can tell Tesla is close to "solving self-driving" because they are down to the tough edge cases like *checks notes* trains

nz.news.yahoo.com/tesla-autopi...

27 replies 157 reposts 668 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Phil Lewis's avatar Phil Lewis @phillewis.bsky.social
[ View ]

Supreme Court gives Joe Biden the legal OK to assassinate Donald Trump

32 replies 126 reposts 543 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

This is a short, clear, and insightful paper about the perils, hopes, and (especially) hype around applications of CRISPR therapy to trans folx. Well worth reading..

0 replies 1 reposts 11 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Ooh! That's a very good paper. The last section and the conclusion are spot on!

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

Yes. Authoritarian regimes have imperfect information and finite resources, so it's good not to make oneself into one of their low-hanging fruit.

0 replies 2 reposts 29 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

AI is not the only thing ripping off artists.

The Louvre copied the 2017 participatory dance piece, "Museum Workout" by Monica Bill Barnes and Robbie Saenz de Viteri, and neither paid the original choreographers nor gave them credit.

www.monicabillbarnes.com/blog/museum-...

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

**Anne** Gorsuch

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

In 1981 Ann Gorsuch said, "The EPA will defer to Chevron" and in 1984 SCOTUS said, "The courts will defer to EPA's deference to Chevron." But Dems took over EPA, and Neil G. whined, "EPA isn't deferring to Chevron the way mommy used to," so his court bros took pity and killed deference to EPA.

1 replies 1 reposts 1 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

In 1981 Ann Gorsuch said, "The EPA will defer to Chevron" and in 1984 SCOTUS said, "The courts will defer to EPA's deference to Chevron." But Dems took over EPA, and Neil G. whined, "EPA isn't deferring to Chevron the way mommy used to," so his court bros took pity and killed deference to EPA.

1 replies 1 reposts 1 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Gillian Branstetter's avatar Gillian Branstetter @gbbranstetter.bsky.social
[ View ]

I like naming non-pathologized benefits trans kids get from this care. Less about decreasing depression/anxiety/suicidality; more about building friendships, healthier family relationships, more focus in school, more ambition, planning for their future. All of which is true!

1 replies 7 reposts 120 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Gillian Branstetter's avatar Gillian Branstetter @gbbranstetter.bsky.social
[ View ]

A point I've started using lately is the fact so many families I speak to are leaving the only homes their kids have ever known to ensure their trans kid can maintain access to hormones or blockers. Do you really think they're doing that for anything short of essential for their child's well-being?

2 replies 85 reposts 437 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

SCOTUS overturning Chevron is getting lots of attention, but I expect SEC v. Jarkesy will have a more destructive effect on regulation. If it takes a jury trial every time the EPA fines a polluter, every time OSHA fines an employer for an unsafe workplace, etc., regulation will be strangled.

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Reposted by Jonathan Gilligan

Ned Resnikoff's avatar Ned Resnikoff @resnikoff.bsky.social
[ View ]

On the same morning, the Court said: 1) We should not presume to know more than small town mayors regarding complex, technical questions like whether to arrest people for being poor. 2) I don't see why a "PhD" in "nuclear physics" should have any latitude to implement ambiguous energy rules.

6 replies 249 reposts 677 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

"above all else, stare decisis is a “doctrine of judicial modesty.” ... In that, it shares something im- portant with Chevron. Both tell judges that they do not know everything.... So today, the majority rejects what judicial humility counsels not just once but twice over." --- Id at 25

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

The majority "insists that 'agencies have no special compe- tence' in filling gaps or resolving ambiguities in regulatory statutes; rather, '[c]ourts do.' Ante, at 23. Score one for self-confidence; maybe not so high for self-reflection or -knowledge." --- Id. at 13

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jonathan Gilligan's avatar Jonathan Gilligan @jgilligan.org
[ View ]

"If opinions had titles, a good candidate for today's would be Hubris Squared" --- Loper Bright v. Raimondo No 22-451 (slip op.) (June 28, 2024) at 3 (Kagan, J., dissenting, on the obliteration of Chevron).

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes