a thing I’ve really woken up to in recent years is the extent to which capitalists refuse to pay employees fairly as an ideological matter. it’s not maximizing profit or reallocating capital. it’s not even greed, per se. it’s just power.
Like how they want everyone to come into work as usual even while the pandemic is still happening. The bosses miss telling people what to do in person.
And this holds the answer to “Isn’t $N million enough money for one person?” Money and power are fungible, and once you have that much power, you get to thinking you can never have too much power (i.e. money).
You know they willingly spend a ton of money for no reason, prop up a whole parasitic industry, just so they can get the nut from hearing someone whose loved ones need that health insurance groveling for their job before firing them.
Not necessarily even that. They're even sorry about it. It's a solemn duty, like throwing the virgin into the volcano. The sacrifice the market gods require.
See Starbucks CEO, who wanted to think of himself as the generous CEO, and was/is really really angry at the employees wanting things he hadn't chosen to give them. How dare you unionize when I have decreed that you are happy!
The groveling, they love it. They seek it as an end into itself. I might not have been cynical enough to even consider the thought before the pandemic, but now I don't even consider it cynical; it's just plain to see.
yeah, it's all about enforcing hierarchy. Inflating their compensation to historically nonsensical degrees, and denying their workers a fair wage is purely ago the ego to them; about assuring themselves of their ~superiority~ through enforcing ~inferiority~ on others. It's disgusting.
I feel like you often see this as well when the labor organizers. Rich people would rather shutter the business than pay any wages to union employees. Even if they would still make money.
Desire for power is one of the main things motivating powerful people. Why? because to get powerful requires a lot of effort, which you're not going to put in unless you really want power.
Everyone pressure the fuck out of people to end their subs. Stop advertising in that paper. I’m just saying vote with your wallet, pressure with your funds. Bands make them dance, & I’m sick of them throwing people to be sacrificed to the capitalism god as if some ritual. “WE MIST EXPLOIT YOU.”
If he values their labor highly, it implies that he gives them some measure of credit for his success. His ego can't handle that, it has to be that they're all interchangeable and the only important factor is his own singular brilliance.
the US spends more on healthcare per capita than nations with public healthcare, and private healthcare is a factor keeping people from changing jobs
so once again, it's not about budgeting, it's about control
I’ve noticed a trend in my field (class action litigation) that I think is related to this. Companies are pursuing scorched-earth litigation strategies when it would make more financial sense to settle and move on for no apparent reason other than “fuck you, aggrieved consumer”
It’s often quite self destructive, since demoralized and underpaid employees are very unproductive. There are a lot of companies that could generate more money by investing in people.
The guy who invented flaming hot Cheetos was a janitor, for example.
WGA strike drove this home for me too. The companies had the money, they just *hated* the power differential that writers might actually have the leverage to make them pay it.
Yeah, that's the real poison. Not money or riches - POWER.
The line about power and corruption is very old, but very true. Power is perhaps the most potent drug imaginiable, and there are very, very few people who aren't utterly ruined by it.
The cheap labor thing seems even more basic than prejudice to the bosses who run it, and they'll get away with it as long as they make prejudice their brand.
Maybe Jeff should stop the WaPo from being a rotten, lying government-propaganda outlet - and get back to just reporting. They have fallen Far from Watergate.
This is why I'm always amazed we don't have more ESOPs and co-ops. There are enough smart people to build them. Maybe there just aren't enough who aren't also greedy or hungry for power or both.
shareholders and management know they hold all the cards both with anti-union laws AND pro-them slanted bankruptcy laws. They want everyone as close to minimum wage and poverty line as possible
Wealth for these guys is about exerting control and setting precedent. They don't want to be obligated to pay, they don't want to set the precedent of paying. The god-kings no longer have anything normal to spend money on, so it has become an exercise in power.
i fail to see the controversy here. jeff isnt running a business as a charity? you expect him to top-up the wapo with a hundred million every year. i know he can afford it but seems like his choosing not to is reasonable.
I’ve seen it in the non-profit sector. Our benevolent dictator laid off the employees in his money-losing legacy project as soon as COVID closings began and they could not work entirely from home. He would have lost the same amount of money if they’d worked or not, but he couldn’t owe it to them
Like landlords who refuse to lower rents even when their apartments are empty or companies that spend more money on union busting than they would if they just paid employees fairly. It's more a matter of principle that keeps the plebs in check.