Over at the Bad Place, I made a tradition of posting Douglass' "What, To The Slave, Is The Fourth of July," and I intend to carry on that tradition here.
Since most versions you read in classes or in textbooks have parts omitted, the link below has the full text of the speech.
14 replies
611 reposts
1322 likes
Both parties make or interpret rules as needed, to suit their interest in the moment.
Of course I would prefer the rule of law, but that has been a fiction without normative power for a while now, in this country.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
History will recall that the New York Times, that bastion of "the liberal media," on July 4, 2024 chose to give prime space on their op-ed page to a theocratic absolutist who argued that people shouldn't vote, even though he himself has voted in the last 2 elections (but nowhere is that mentioned).
24 replies
275 reposts
824 likes
Liberals learned nothing.
Except how to be willing collaborators.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Jesus rode his dinosaur into battle at Bunker Hill to defeat the Roman, Papist, and British armies on July 4th. He will return to repeat this miracle in Jerusalem to ring in the End of Days. Thus it is writ.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Oh, it's effed up alright.
Monarchy was probably less arbitrary and lawless than what we currently have.
I was questioning the comparison for that reason.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Counter to popular imagination, a monarch is bound by the law. Even an absolute monarch is free only from observing divine law, not his own laws.
That's different from modern dictators, who know no law except the immediate will of the people (as known only to the dictator).
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
He'll get to keep his pants, so he shouldn't complain.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Chaser:
0 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Shot:
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
youtube.com/watch?v=DPiS...
0 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
I heard "Ruth Bader Biden" for the first time yesterday and I think that one has legs.
2 replies
16 reposts
77 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
"Which will remain bloodless if the *left* allows it to be"
Emphasis mine.
The media can hand wave this away all they want, but when someone intimates they're prepared to kill you, you should probably fucking believe them. If only that same media realizes they'd be first.
0 replies
6 reposts
20 likes
May the liberal collaborators pay dearly for their cowardice and complicity.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
It’s been consistently true over the last fifteen years that people, relatively calmly, sounding the alarm about an incoming political or social catastrophe have been quite rudely dismissed by what you could call the Sensible Liberal Class and then immediately proven right. Few learn a lesson.
5 replies
123 reposts
358 likes
"I will decide your future" sounds more true.
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
At the ground level, all I see Democrats do is accommodation and collaboration, because everything else would upset the Chamber of Commerce.
Without popular mobilization (cf. Bolivia), a Newsom or Whitmer is instant toast.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Fascists are precisely not a different category of humans from you. They are dangerous for how normal they are. Average. Familiar.
The difference is in their ideology. The commitment to inequality as foundation of a natural order. Strength as virtue. Disdain for weakness. Natural selection.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
The conclusion makes sense - you don't have to debate them, you must defeat them.
But in order to do that, you need to be able to define the threat clearly, and this ultimately moralistic approach fails to do that.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
THE sentence of the day: A Macronist incumbent in the Marseille region came in 3rd in her seat. She just dropped out to support the left. She said, about why she's maneuvering to block the far-right:
"Defeats happen, but you can never recover from dishonor."
19 replies
506 reposts
1706 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
March 23 1933, the Enabling Act becomes law in Germany, giving the chief executive power enforce his own laws without checks and balances. The passing of the Act marked the formal transition from democratic republic to totalitarian dictatorship. 6 months later, it was a 1 party state.
36 replies
1170 reposts
2111 likes
Reposted by Lars Maischak
I love centrists man, they believe both that they are the only people smart enough to make important decisions and that anything that happens as a result of those decisions is someone else's fault
2 replies
16 reposts
100 likes
Yes, and that matches the development in Germany leading up to 1933.
In this graph, the black, blue, and yellow shows liberal, centrist, and conservative parties. Brown in the Nazis. Red, orange, and dark red is Social Democrats and Communists.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
In short, just like in the US and Germany, it is centrists who think that the (remote) threat of socialism in case of a left-wing candidate's victory is much worse than the certainty of fascism.
1 replies
13 reposts
37 likes