We bought an old pontoon last year, and I have mixed feelings about it, including the complexities of maintenance and I need a new motor. But I do like that you can put up an awning and then it’s like fishing in a tent. at least until the lightning comes and then you have to go inside.
0 replies
0 reposts
22 likes
I hear you. We spent most of last year in high fire danger. This year it’s all flood. There could be a really good storm tonight. That will just totally ruin everyone’s plan for fireworks. I’m for it.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by David M. Perry
absolutely cannot believe that all 100 slots sold out, but let’s keep going! if we get to 120 I’ll do three separate sessions which will give everyone a wider choice of dates and still keep the group size manageable for a Q&A! $12,000 for voting rights, let’s go!!
5 replies
14 reposts
57 likes
I’m not sure why you think I won’t block you for trashing the people who just published me. Do you want to be blocked? Is that the goal here?
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Sure. But when I have been published in their opinion section, my work was checked very closely. This is a failure of their own procedures in particular for guest essays, which they generally check more rigorously than staff columnists (a problem too, but a diff one).
2 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
Assuming that it is correct that he voted, then someone should lose their job. I don’t say that lightly.
2 replies
0 reposts
28 likes
Honey, I ate the fish! :)
0 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
There’s one set of problems to publish the same piece twice. There’s a second set to have the core claim be dishonest. And easily checked.
1 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
Yep
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
No, it’s a tractor supply hat. I threw it away. But that’s a bass pic www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/o...
1 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
Right. I mean, people write that kind of boycott thing all the time when they’re not actually boycotting. But that hat went in the garbage and later or threw away some cat litter and some fish guts so …
0 replies
1 reposts
12 likes
Reposted by David M. Perry
Imagine writing the "I don't wear that hat anymore" piece in a world where your choice of hat was recorded in a public register every day, and just deciding to brazen through it while wearing the hat.
2 replies
4 reposts
40 likes
Maybe There will be some explanation that people have the wrong guy when they’ve looked up his voting record. I don’t know. I’ll go back to my general statement That opinion pages should not be printing falsifiable bullshit. That should not be the job.
4 replies
4 reposts
106 likes
I don’t fucking get it.
4 replies
3 reposts
61 likes
That includes the one piece I wrote for the New York Times. They checked it very carefully. They did a good job. I appreciated the labor.
1 replies
3 reposts
72 likes
I have published hundreds of opinion essays (as well as reported features and other kinds of pieces). But just for opinion essays – and they have always required a certain minimum level of evidence, and sometimes a ton of evidence.
1 replies
4 reposts
81 likes
The don’t vote guy in fact seems to have voted in the last two elections.
2 replies
7 reposts
109 likes
I did. It’s not a great picture because I took it myself and I’m a little sundrenched. Glad CNN used the bass pic instead. www.instagram.com/p/C7VBAYcPPV...
4 replies
0 reposts
54 likes
CNN fact checked whether I in fact caught walleye while wearing a specific hat more thoroughly than the NYT checked whether the “I dont vote” guy actually voted.
14 replies
154 reposts
978 likes
Deleted that because I thought the subject of the second clause was unclear. Hang on.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by David M. Perry
As someone that has published multiple pieces in the Times and continue to admire the work of many of their journalists this was a hard and depressing decision for me
1 replies
4 reposts
61 likes