Deplatforming is out of favor in Silicon Valley. But it works.
A new study in Nature finds that Twitter's mass suspension of 70,000 QAnon-linked accounts after Jan. 6 meaningfully reduced the overall circulation of fake and hyperpartisan news on the platform. www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
One side (the far right) was consistently breaking the terms and conditions they agreed to, terms and conditions were enforced, and they claimed they were being discriminated against.
We need to deplatform everyone who spreads hate speech.
The irresponsibility in the tech world is directly responsible for the decline of and threats to democracy world wide. We need new crimes for this kind of willful, greed-based negligence.
the state of t&s now vs. 3 years ago is fucking sad. but it's heartening to know that there are proven methods to curb this shit. deploying them in capitalism is another challenge obv
I remember when I used to respect Silicon Valley. Then I realized it's mostly full of libertarian egomaniacs with the EQ of a brick who name their kids shit like Invictus Maximus.
The response was a coordinated pressure campaign among Republican politicians to get the companies to reverse their policies and the world's wealthiest right-winger to buy the major one that wouldn't succumb.
I can't remember anything Dems did to try and prevent this.
Notice that The Washington post doesn't have a "Number" for all the progressive, anti-Trump, anti-plutocrat, user's it's suspended since Musky took over. www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-...
Not gonna buy it. He just manipulated QAnon out of the power position and replaced them with the White supremacists to appeal to a broader audience. The QAnon nuts aren't the power vote behind Trump and the extreme right Plutocrats. Bigotry and hate is. www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-...
“Some of the websites the study considered low-quality were Gateway Pundit, Breitbart and Judicial Watch.”
Side note: I find it infuriating that Google News will not let me remove those sites from News search results.
They are not “news” sites!
I think it depends on what you mean by “works”. It’s been proven beyond a doubt that deplatforming has a positive impact on platform health. But some people seem to think that deplatforming will have a wider impact on society, and that’s less clear.
Of course it did! That's honestly the biggest no-brainer I can imagine. Sure, some people would have made dummy accounts and kept posting after being banned, but most people are lazy.
And being banned would mean starting from scratch with no following, so lies are less likely to spread. Obvious.
Is anyone building any alternative media for progressives?
MAGAts built up their own media ecosystem for 40 years - talk radio, Fox News, Twitter, podcasts, streams
And now have captured most of the “mainstream” media - NYT, WaPo, CNN etc
Seems like a ripe time to break completely and start fresh