remind me, when companies create an actual revolutionary technology that is going to change the world, do they usually have to beg users to adopt it, give it away for free for years, and at last resort force it on people with no way to disable it? Is that usually how revolutionary tech works?
This is a good argument, but amusingly the answer is “sometimes, yeah”. Introducing potatoes to Europe was an absolute game-changer in terms of nutrition per acreage, but met with skepticism so folks like this guy had to hype it/invent dishes to show it off, etc. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoine...
Naw, the last time we got to see a real moment like that was the release of windows 95. If its good enough, people will lose their minds for it
Though, no one releases computer software in big boxes anymore so its harder to gauge
We should bring that back
Exactly, truly transformational products sell themselves; there's no need for hype and forced engagement. They also usually start out as curiosities, E.g. the internet and smartphones.
When steel was invented, everyone was forced to carry a sword. When Graham invented the telephone, US Marshals forced their way into every home to install them in the kitchen. This is how science works.
What confirms it is a revolutionary technology? Sometimes the companies believe too much of itself due to bias. Sometimes it is too early for the market acceptance.
yes but not in this way.
the inventor of the LED died destitute and LEDs weren’t widely adopted until much later
they weren’t spending billions on it obv
Give it away for free probably
Everyone allowed AI Generated images/videos/assets for free until the well dried up.
Now we have companies wanting to shove AI into every aspect of computing. Apple did it a long time ago (Machine Learning) but it wasn't the way Microsoft/Google does it.
Who is it that actively hates progress? Here's a hint, they don't have the word "progress" in their name.
Now, compare the technology you're implying with technology that has been actively stifled in history.
What group is pushing the tech you're implying?
I mean, I am all here for chatgpt skepticism, but…sometimes yes? People destroyed Semmelweis rather than believe him about hand-washing. Ditto Cantor and number theory. Joseph Lister had to do a giant PR tour for surgical antiseptic. And WOW but people worried that writing would destroy thought.
Isn’t that exactly how everything works? Herd mentality hates change. Not pitching for AI, here. Complementing you on the eloquent capture of a fundamental truth.
They didn't have to though? ChatGPT became extremely popular basically overnight and that was entirely organic. Google is adding AI to search because people are already using it and they want to capitalize on that