Policy mediator/facilitator, former newsperson. Power to the people.
What's odd to me these days is the way people use generational descriptors as categories of condemnation. Maybe because of my family's poor/working class background, I've always thought of class, ethnicity, gender as more defining than age in terms of people's politics and attitude toward power...
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
The opinion is bad, but not that bad. He wrote private checks in the Oval Office, an entirely private act. There is no way that was part of even the "outer perimeter" of presidential power. Plus Norm Eisen said he already tried to appeal on immunity on this case so a 2nd try can't move forward...
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Well, he lost in 2020, didn't he? That mattered for shit. Democracy takes work - freedom is a constant struggle - etc. etc.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
/8 At any rate, congratulations to the Federalist Society for an achievement beyond the reach of the British, outside the grasp of bloody civil war, impossible to Nazis and Soviets and terrorists: defeating the American idea.
40 replies
894 reposts
2791 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
/7 Justice Roberts smug and superior dismissal of the dissents’ concerns seems to come to us via time warp from some time that never knew Trump. The danger of lawlessness he poses are manifest — he and his followers brag of them. Only a liar or fool would dismiss them.
19 replies
233 reposts
1570 likes
regarding someone so sociopathic he can't comprehend what the Constitution is and means and can't therefore carry out his oath of office...just mind-boggling and a seeming play for power...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
/2 Motive being irrelevant means that the President can do a thing for expressly lawless reasons so long as the thing is within the extremely broad range of official acts. So question isn’t “can the President conspire to defraud,” it’s “can the President call a state official about an election.”
11 replies
155 reposts
1090 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration at all to say the decision threatens the Republic. I might not have said so in 2015, before I saw how triumphantly lawless and autocratic the President could be, and how so many people would applaud it or at least shrug.
42 replies
496 reposts
1694 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
"Only one candidate is celebrating today's ruling, and he is a convicted felon."
0 replies
7 reposts
58 likes
I saw some pushback via nitter that this vote was already scheduled before the debate - it is required in order to get Biden on the Ohio ballot, re that whole threat to keep him off the state's ballot because our convention would be too late.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
A pro-Kremlin influence operation run by a former Florida cop who's now based in Moscow, which uses AI to create fake news websites like DC Weekly or Chicago Crier, is beginning to shift its focus from disparaging Ukraine to the upcoming US election.
www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/...
0 replies
3 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Thousands of Jewish and Palestinian citizens of Israel packed a major hall in Tel Aviv, for the biggest conference since October 7th that calls to end the war on Gaza and the occupation, to return the hostages, and to advance towards Israeli-Palestinian peace.🕊️
www.standing-together.org/english
4 replies
69 reposts
180 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Justice Sotomayor points out that--surprise!--the majority is deciding a made-up case.
7 replies
68 reposts
303 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
rereading the Colorado disqualification case and noticing for the first time that it turns at a critical point on the Supreme Court's misreading of 14(5) in Boerne v Flores. Because the Court invented a made-up version of 14(5) that was narrow and "remedial" rather than a new freestanding power...
2 replies
10 reposts
61 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
I went to bed expecting a 6-3 vote with Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas in the bag for Trump. I figured Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett at least wouldn't be unhinged enough to grant a president utter immunity from legal consequences for murdering his political enemies or arresting Congress.
11 replies
64 reposts
403 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
It's not the worst of it, but what I may be actually angriest about (right now) is Roberts' smarmy smugness and dismissiveness in the final two paragraphs of section IV and the whole of section V. "Fear mongering," "extreme hypotheticals," "our perspective must be more farsighted," and this.
38 replies
125 reposts
821 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Also, saying the 'hypothetical scenario' that a leader may use their powers to further their own ends while ruling on a case where a leader used their powers to further their own ends and coming to the conclusion that such a thing could never happen seems a little disingenuous too.
1 replies
6 reposts
48 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
I've made a bit of a hobbyhorse out of Nikolas Sarkozy's criminal prosecutions, and the multiple dimensions by which a similar case would be impossible in the US
I now have a new overarching grounds to add (president = god-emperor)
bsky.app/profile/saba...
0 replies
5 reposts
39 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
It's just hilariously disingenuous. Imagine looking at, say, ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY and concluding that the biggest threat to liberty isn't abuse of power, but powerful people refraining from sufficiently wielding their authority out of fear that they might one day be held accountable.
21 replies
385 reposts
1561 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
roberts’ reasoning is fundamentally (lower-case “r”) anti-republican. i know we dunk on the framers here but roberts has issued a rebuke of the revolutionary assumption that concentrated, unaccountable power is a fundamental threat to liberty.
23 replies
479 reposts
2084 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Shorter Supreme Court this term: criminal law is for little people.
38 replies
224 reposts
1241 likes
YES. THANK YOU for this! We need to carve out that hope...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
If Jefferson had just ordered Madison to kill Marbury and then pardoned him for it, then his problem would’ve been solved and the courts wouldn’t have gotten involved.
4 replies
17 reposts
187 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Like there's a lot they were not especially clear about, and all sorts of reasons where we shouldn't tie our own future to their past. But "Kings are bad; the President is not a King; he must be constrained by law" is one of the few things they were, to their credit, very clear about
10 replies
143 reposts
723 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Textbook propaganda in Coley's definition: rhetoric that invokes an ideal in the service of undermining that ideal.
"Separation of powers!" but demolishes checks and balances
"Religious liberty!" but privileges one religion's illiberalism
"Originalism!" but completely misses the framers' intent
0 replies
1 reposts
9 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Can't be impeached because presidential impeachment has been a dead letter since parties came into existence.
Can't be disqualified from office.
And can't be prosecuted for crimes committed under color of office.
45 replies
181 reposts
950 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
THE sentence of the day: A Macronist incumbent in the Marseille region came in 3rd in her seat. She just dropped out to support the left. She said, about why she's maneuvering to block the far-right:
"Defeats happen, but you can never recover from dishonor."
20 replies
708 reposts
2463 likes
Super interesting: Roberts SCOTUS: as radical as the Dred Scott court, but FAR more powerful
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
How "originalist" of them...😒
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
My article for @newrepublic
“The Supreme Court has effectively ruled that 250 years of U.S. history under a republic is enough.”
newrepublic.com/article/1833...
10 replies
182 reposts
529 likes
And said Bibi should just go whole-hog and wipe Gaza out and his son-in-law said it should all be redeveloped into luxury condos (I'm sure not for Palestinians)...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Can we maybe get this bullshit updated?
45 replies
167 reposts
1260 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
The Supremes ruled that a POTUS has immunity for actions directly related to his office, but not personal actions (without defining what those are) so Trump is trying to erase his felony convictions by claiming that paying porn stars hush money for sex is “official POTUS business,” as expected
15 replies
83 reposts
298 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
damn straight, take the flag back as a symbol of what we want it to stand for
especially with the trumpies flying a bunch of weird flags of their own
1 replies
1 reposts
23 likes
They've been willing to lick his toes precisely because of all the power he is going to give them. But we are not totally focked - we can all vote for democracy like our lives depend on it. We ARE the majority. We just need to get our shit together & stop acting like losers.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yeah, it's all the Federalist Koch (toxic waste magnate) $$$$. Though I've also wondered about the massive over-representation of Opus Dei Franco-style Catholics on this small body...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
It feels like we live in a different country after this morning. This feels seismic.
0 replies
1 reposts
13 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
I really cannot emphasize how catastrophically bad the Court's ruling was. I do my best not to exaggerate about these kinds of things but I am still kind of in shock
55 replies
246 reposts
1599 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
Trump will not stop pushing if you give him a slap on the wrist; he will push as far as he can possibly go. We've already seen this in action when the House failed to impeach him over the Mueller report and he immediately embarked on extorting Ukraine
4 replies
62 reposts
304 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
now he is seeking a second term knowing that whatever he does, any criminal prosecution will be hung up for literal years in court if it ever gets off the ground in the first place. what do you think he is going to try to do?
7 replies
37 reposts
177 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
"how dare the president say something from the white house in his official capacity about SCOTUS saying the president is above the law, why won't someone arrest him"
3 replies
2 reposts
48 likes
It's no longer the nation's great paper of record. It's a small cabal of whiny, defensive ego maniacs bent on vengeance for being denied an interview.
0 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
"President Biden, who seemed fully conscious and did not drool on himself, warned that an asteroid would wipe out all life in three days. Though he's been long dogged by questions about his physical and mental stamina, the president remained upright as he briefed the nation on the coming apocalypse"
17 replies
73 reposts
430 likes
Sheldon Whitehouse had a good thread on nitter today about dark $$$$ (and I would add oligarchy) being behind a lot of today's US problems, and making that a campaign focus. It will take many of us joining together to take US back from that secretive 1%.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reform SCOTUS 2025
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Explain how this all works with the state nomination and fund-raising process. From what I understand, other candidates can't raise $ until they get on state ballots & Biden-Harris $$$ can't go to another candidate. stephaniejones2.substack.com/p/the-biden-...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
For historians, the retrospective legitimation of essentially every criminal act Nixon committed while in office is quite mind-boggling. Ford’s pardon was utterly unnecessary.
10 replies
193 reposts
646 likes
We are Germany 1932.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
And as an institutionalist, he won't act that way.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Protective Hen
The Court has saved Trump, kneecapped Smith, and set up the conditions for an elective monarchy.
21 replies
49 reposts
219 likes