“if money was abolished would you still make content?” is the most insane AI bullshit i have ever heard in my life
i was making art and drawing way before i was making money for it how fucking corrupt are these pieces of shit? money is barely part of the equation. its only there cause i NEED IT
That's incredibly delulu... Can't tell you how many ppl I've met who say "I used to art" and don't because burnt out. 100% would bet a soul that if we didn't have to grind there would be MUCH MORE content because people wouldn't get burnt out and they'd create and create and create.
How many people pour thousands of hours and dollars into making pottery and crocheting and baking and all these little life things that were once trades and now are mostly money-sucking hobbies just because they've GOTTA
if they abolished money everything would look a million times cooler within a fuckin' week because artists would just finally be able to blast creative rope everywhere
It's weird seeing coders push it. Like Do they think that it isn't already replacing low-level coding jobs, or do they not care because their seniority makes them feel safe? It's gonna get way higher up that chain real fast.
The only reasonable answer is no.
I wouldn't make content, I would make art. And "content" would forever be exiled to freight manifests the backs of juice cartons where it belongs.
This is the same Techbro brainrot that brought you Soylent. Strip food of all its cultural and emotional meaning, remove all flavour, remove all love - reduce it to bland sustenance. Same with art. They have absolutely no idea how to human.
"Why is it all about money for you people?"
"I dunno Horace why are you selling x1000 big tiddy AI elf lady packs on Artstation for $20 bucks a piece?"
It must be sad to be a person for whom the only things worth making are those with mass market appeal.
If I didn't have the need for money on my mind I would have probably been sharing my work with the small number of people who might enjoy it ten years sooner.
Do they not realise that making art has been an intrinsic part for tens of thousands of years before money was even invented??? Ugh, this is why we need humanities back
Yeah, and like if you look at an artist schedule: searching for money with administrative work and/or communication is taking so much of our time. Time we could spend idk making art?
What is the context here? As in, who is saying that and why? I'm curious but don't really see what relevance that question has to AI art. Unless they're trying to trick you into making free art?
I’m not allowed to sell anything that will make my bank balance go over $2,000 but I’m still making 50 hour embroideries. When I’m not mending my clothing, which has become essential
“If money was abolished no one would [insert thing whichever guy is speaking thinks is too hard/boring]” dude I promise there is someone whose literal dream is to do nothing but that one thing forever and not have to stress about getting paid for it.
*eye twitching at the word “content”*
But then again, tho these bozos, it’s all just slop they throw in a trough for their paypiggies to devour.
But yeah, if money/profit wasn’t part of the process, I’d draw MORE. All sorts of stuff. Stuff for me, my friends, loved ones, or random folk.
Imagine thinking that there are more artists who only make art for the money than there are artists who cannot make art because they're busy doing something else to make money
Why do these AI business tech bros think we make art solely for money? Yes, I deserve to try and make a career out of my art, but I didn't start out with that mindset. I like art! Art is human expression! They don't get that at all. Everything is just for money.
if they abolished money not only would i be doing art for art sake because that's what I'd do, but I'd also be baking for my family and neighbors, making furniture for myself and others, learning another instrument. shit, I'd dump this day job and just art all day
I make no money off of my art so of course I would! Art, in any form, is so important to humanity that we've mass produced it to a "normalized and invisible" sense so most people don't even see it as the same thing anymore. The art we draw for money isn't the same as art used in TV to most people.
My illustrator spouse has an illustration day job, a side hustle doing a different kind of illustration, and STILL finds time to do his own art as a hobby because he loves it so much. I’m pretty sure he’d replace sleep with drawing if humans could survive without it
I mean pretty much my goal in life is to not need to make money so I can spend my time writing poetry, literary fiction and open-source typesetting software.
Ppl who ask stupid questions like this are so completely empty inside that they have nothing that actually brings them joy. The only high they get is from chasing that next dollar so they can’t fathom ppl just doing what they love for the sake of doing it. I *almost* feel bad for them…almost 😂
This seems like a generational thing. I've seen so many younger people who become YouTubers or streamers solely as a career move, while people my age who grew up in the Geocities era like to make shit for fun and throw it online to share their joy with the world.
My answer to that is usually: well no because I don’t and have never made ‘content’. I make ‘art’, and when I’m paid for it I make ‘professional art’. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If money was abolished I would, at age 50, learn woodworking and spend the rest of my life doing nothing but that and photography. IT work can fuck all the way off.
if money was abolished the profit incentive of making art goes away, but assuming the profit incentive is the only reason people use AI tools is a bad argument.
i support AI and any use case for it that isn't stupid. i also draw on paper without AI without a profit motive for it. it can coexist
I agree; defining what I do to as “content” for money is a completely different mindset. If I had UBI I’d still DRAW - probably more because I wouldn’t need the day job. I make stuff because I want to draw, I like making stuff. I show people because life sucks and maybe it will make them happier.
They're telling on themselves. They wouldn't make art without the possibility of monetization, which is why they're so gung-ho for AI. It's the least amount of work possible that could still get them paid.
100%. If money didn't exist, I'd write MORE books, because my heart requires it and I'd spend way less time worrying about how I was going to make rent.