Hayes Brown's avatar

Hayes Brown

@hayesbrown.bsky.social

idk it just seems to me that laws, like tech, should be created with the question "what would the worst person i know be able to do with this power" in mind and it's truly incredible how much this opinion fails at that basic task

42 replies 186 reposts 1020 likes


's avatar @anonymoustroll.bsky.social
[ View ]

What if (and hear me out) that is exactly what Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Barrett & Gorsuch thought about, and they are eager for it. rebulicans are a minority party with no policies to sell beyond hate, fear & lies. They openly model their political strategy on that of Victor Orban.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


People Person's avatar People Person @zenosocks.bsky.social
[ View ]

That's a fantastic test and, unfortunately, a lot of recent tech fails it spectacularly too.

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Onno Benschop's avatar Onno Benschop @owh.bsky.social
[ View ]

Having set up an association and having written its constitution with exactly that in mind, how could this be abused, I learnt two things. 1) As devious as you might envisage, there's no substitute for actual malicious intent. 2) The rules only work for people who respect them.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Seth Masket's avatar Seth Masket @smotus.bsky.social
[ View ]

I think they asked that question and were happy with the answer

0 replies 0 reposts 15 likes


JustinSmithArt's avatar JustinSmithArt @justinsmithart.bsky.social
[ View ]

Y’know, it’s almost as if John Roberts is a foul human being who WANTS the worst people in the world to succeed at the worst possible goals.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Robert Black's avatar Robert Black @hurricanexyz.bsky.social
[ View ]

Oh I think he was thinking about that He just likes it

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


サージャントヒッピー's avatar サージャントヒッピー @sgthippie.bsky.social
[ View ]

I ask myself, “What could I do with this power…” which is basically the same thing, right?

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Lew Morton's avatar Lew Morton @lewmorton.bsky.social
[ View ]

His idea of the worst person is just very very different from ours

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @hortnon.bsky.social
[ View ]

well then they'd have to look at themselves if they asked that question

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Off The Chain Atheist's avatar Off The Chain Atheist @otcatheist.bsky.social
[ View ]

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Kai's avatar Kai @kailb.bsky.social
[ View ]

And this case was specifically about that person also!

0 replies 0 reposts 22 likes


Doug Merrill's avatar Doug Merrill @bagatsen.bsky.social
[ View ]

This Lex Trump is designed for use by one person only. It's an Enabling Act ("Ermächtigungsgesetz" for the history buffs out there) in the American idiom.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Mash's avatar Mash @fragment.city
[ View ]

This sort of "systems thinking" is a critical skill in government and the law. The idea that 3 justices have it and the other 6 don't is almost impossible to believe. This leaves open the very real and heartbreaking possibility that the majority knows exactly what they're dancing around.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


's avatar @dmgerstein.bsky.social
[ View ]

When the worst person you know holds the key to the kingdom of god you have planned to install your entire anxiety free life and when you are the law…….

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Timothy A Wiseman's avatar Timothy A Wiseman @timwiseman.bsky.social
[ View ]

The Supreme Court's opinion is disturbing.

Your concept slightly more formalized is sometimes called the "veil of ignorance". ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/vei...

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Roxanne Darling 🌿's avatar Roxanne Darling 🌿 @roxannedarling.bsky.social
[ View ]

ABSO should be required!

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


CJ's avatar CJ @arsonfly.bsky.social
[ View ]

Generally they carry on with the tech regardless, don't they?

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Daddeh's avatar Daddeh @daddeh.bsky.social
[ View ]

Jim Jeffries summed it up nicely when talking about how you might be able to drive fine after a few drinks, but Dave sure as hell can't. So no drunk driving.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Andrew A. Gill's avatar Andrew A. Gill @andrewagill.bsky.social
[ View ]

The argument is probably that the founders made this suicide pact, not John Roberts, so they are obliged to carry it out.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @jenniferholton7.bsky.social
[ View ]

What if John Roberts is actually just "the worst person"?

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @susandathome.bsky.social
[ View ]

I have asked myself lately - is our democracy so good that we can actually vote ourselves into a dictatorship? Are there no guardrails to the type of person we can elect? (I know there was a lot of interference from Russia etc the first time but Americans apparently are ready to let him in again

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Another Friggin Dave's avatar Another Friggin Dave @anotherfriggindave.bsky.social
[ View ]

Not like anything matters anymore but,

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Unscheduled Offworld Activation's avatar Unscheduled Offworld Activation @nerdsherpa.bsky.social
[ View ]

Okay but you have to remember who you’re dealing with here. Amy Coney Barrett definitely saw that bullshit kitty litter for school kids who identify as cats story and thought it was true, and a personal attack on her very soul that must be answered with as much institutional violence as possible.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Chris Parker's avatar Chris Parker @crs1.bsky.social
[ View ]

is there reason to believe Roberts Court doesn't fix the evidence to the case, to take a familiar and salient meme?

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


McIrwin's avatar McIrwin @mcirwin47.bsky.social
[ View ]

But he specifically wants the worst person to wield the power granted to achieve shared goals. This decision is specifically tailored to that end. I don’t think there’s another plausible way to read it.

1 replies 0 reposts 18 likes


's avatar @flatline42.bsky.social
[ View ]

Exactly all my politics are informed by first asking the question "how can this be abused?"

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Will Rosecrans's avatar Will Rosecrans @wrosecrans.bsky.social
[ View ]

I've complained for years about Congress's lack of "Red Team." There should be standing committees dedicated to figuring out the worst possible results from the Blue Team legislative committees draft texts. Do hearings about how to exploit it all ahead of time, not just years later.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Lighting Rod  [Bluesky Older]'s avatar Lighting Rod [Bluesky Older] @yendorcire.bsky.social
[ View ]

That's who it's designed for

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Rick does Math and Stuff's avatar Rick does Math and Stuff @mathandstuff.bsky.social
[ View ]

This "opinion" is literally "what do we have to write to keep Trump out of prison." - some language about immunity - some language blocking evidence already been used to prove guilt - dismissal of any criticism as hysterical - mystical path to actual prosecution, vaguely delineated

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Kevin M. Kruse's avatar Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social
[ View ]

They don't even need to imagine! The individual literally named in the case is one of the worst people on the planet. He's got a track record of doing or attempting some of the worst shit imaginable. This isn't some distant hypothetical!

13 replies 23 reposts 395 likes


TaoOfTweet (and I'm sticking to it)'s avatar TaoOfTweet (and I'm sticking to it) @starfisher.bsky.social
[ View ]

The fundamental problem Is that the court has arrogated to itself the power to make law. There is nothing in the Constitution that grants the court that power.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @napoleon-the-pig.bsky.social
[ View ]

Robert's knows exactly what the "what ifs" are under that decision. He is, and always has been, a corrupt thug of the right in a nice suit with a fancy degree on the wall. He figures the right, like Trump, will make "good use" of what they can get away with under it

1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


Trey Bushart's avatar Trey Bushart @treybushart.bsky.social
[ View ]

"oh, but the worst people would be prevented from having such power?" - Ok then, how? What actual checks are in place to keep that from happening. And what if a majority of people want them to exercise that power in such a manner? Tell me that your honor.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Patent Buddy's avatar Patent Buddy @patentbuddy.bsky.social
[ View ]

This has always been my guiding principle for practicing law and engineering.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


sherri 11/07's avatar sherri 11/07 @17x2lizards.bsky.social
[ View ]

If you take a step back and look at the landscape of John Roberts' decisions, he knows the 'what ifs', then, you realize this is exactly the map he laid out a GPS, one dimensional route. He weakened VRA, he concurred the architect of Citizens United, and he raped the Constitution Monday, 7/1/24

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


's avatar @roudy1.bsky.social
[ View ]

laws in the past were created to judge criminality today in america laws are created to protect criminals seems like a real change in laws or is it those who interpret or make the laws as most are criminals maby we just need to clean house of all criminals removal of them

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Chad Farrenburg's avatar Chad Farrenburg @chadfarrenburg.bsky.social
[ View ]

I think he knows he just doesn’t care.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Satrina🐺🖇🖇🖇's avatar Satrina🐺🖇🖇🖇 @satrinawuff.bsky.social
[ View ]

pretty sure the worst person i know abusing power was the point 🤔

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Doug Moffett 's avatar Doug Moffett @liberallibra.bsky.social
[ View ]

Yeah, like "Christians" asking "What would Jesus do"?

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Mark's avatar Mark @marksimploding.bsky.social
[ View ]

Everything in existence should begin with, what if Musk or Trump did it? If its terrible, we should probably not allow it.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Jacob T. Levy's avatar Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social
[ View ]

Is refusing to follow out the branches of a decision-tree, what, "neurotypical-coded"? No thank you.

0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes