Also, they never do try to run government like a business.
If they did, they'd shut down many red states for being an unprofitable drain on resources, sell California to Japan for a short-term profit bump, and merge the Dakotas, Montana, Wyoming and Idaho into one state to streamline management.
you can't run the US gov like a business because a business would never tolerate having half its employees openly working to sabotage it. including half the board and the C-suite every few years.
Would the Carolinas and Virginias be merged too? ("Why are there *two* Carolinas?" "Reasons?" "Not anymore... you're one big Carolina now. Deal with it.")
Would the "extraneous" states/territories (everything not part of the Lower 48 states) also be ditched, and in a hamfisted way?
โWe are focusing on our core profitable states like California, New York, Massachusetts and Connecticut.
We are looking for strategic alternatives for some of our less profitable statesโ
Merging states like that is crazy talkโฆ
The smart move is to maximize synergies by merging North Carolina with North Dakota, and South Carolina with South Dakota.
Also, the ones who most want it to be run like a business are the ones who want as few internal controls, something absolutely vital to maintain a business as a going concern, as possible.
Let's be clear: I am under no illusion that New Jersey (where I was born, raised, have spent most of my years, and currently live) is, strictly speaking, ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฆ๐ด๐ด๐ข๐ณ๐บ.
"Listen, we're combining the Dakotas - too much redundancy there - and we'll be laying off half of Dakotans. You'll get an e-mail about your status soon."