You can have concerns about Biden's age, but still be absolutely appalled about editorial choices that convey the issue as more important than the Supreme Court offering a pre-emptive thumbs up to a criminal presidency
17 replies
221 reposts
889 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
Austin, a head’s up:
Austin Animal Center has this week closed intake for surrendered animals, and APA is brimming with pets. If you’re able to foster or adopt from either facility, please consider it. APA is only taking pets from AAC at the moment, and adoption fees are 50% off at APA thru 7/3.
0 replies
2 reposts
4 likes
"perhaps the Vice President" 😱
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Doggett did--and in an email to his constituents, he says, "I am not advocating for any particular individual as our best alternative, but in an open, democratic process we will have a number of Governors and perhaps the Vice President and some members of the Senate from which to choose."
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
4. budget reform/Congressional oversight of SCOTUS budget; 5. Codify standards for emergency relief. All suggestions from @stevevladeck.bsky.social.
Schumer: 202-224-6542
Durbin: 202-224-2152
White House: 202-456-1111
If you don't have shithead GOP Senators like I do (Texas), call yours too!
0 replies
3 reposts
11 likes
I just spent five minutes of my lunch break calling the White House, Schumer, and Durbin and asking for these 5 things: 1. Haul Alito and Thomas in to Judiciary for hearings; 2. establish an inspector general for SCOTUS under Article III; 3. docket reform, esp. the mandatory docket; . . . .
1 replies
6 reposts
21 likes
Apart from the humor here: Biden and Congress absolutely can and should be scrutinizing SCOTUS's budget with a microscope, and attaching alllll the strings.
2 replies
4 reposts
15 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
a funny thing Biden could do, unitary-executive-authority-wise is just order GSA to stop cutting paychecks to a bunch of Republican judges and law clerks for a while.
20 replies
59 reposts
378 likes
"with the Constitution if they could, but at any rate to save the country." Word.
0 replies
1 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
I think what's most surprising to me about the immunity decision is that I assumed the conservative justices saw trump as a liability, in the sense that they clearly have a free hand to implement an evil agenda without him. But apparently they actually really like him & welcome chaos
17 replies
20 reposts
206 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
It's too bad the 2nd Amendment dudes who swore they'd be the undauntable defenders of our democracy against attack by a brutal monarch turned out to be too busy denouncing rainbow plushies at Target.
11 replies
101 reposts
529 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
So, today's decision has even LESS support than Dobbs:
www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-i...
23 replies
178 reposts
584 likes
This is the only part of the NYT worth reading, TBH.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
bringing this here because i've had it
39 replies
709 reposts
2385 likes
If you're only willing to do what a corrupt institution allows to be "legal," you have already lost.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
"We need a strong institution that sits outside of electoral politics, that is not at the mercy of right wing courts, that has its own inherent form of power that can be exercised on behalf of the public good, that will naturally work toward progressive goals. My friends, that is the labor movement"
0 replies
3 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
Doomer shit is un-American as fuck. Sorry. Factual.
This country didn't even consider me a fucking person for half its existence, and the Supreme Court declared Black ppl didn't qualify as US citizens TWICE.
10 replies
142 reposts
787 likes
I'll be the first to admit that anger has a lot of drawbacks, but let me tell you something folks: It beats the holy fuck out of fear.
2 replies
1 reposts
9 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
the dog caught the car
5 replies
33 reposts
182 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
roberts essentially ignores the purpose of separation of powers, which was not to create entirely separate spheres of action but to prevent the emergence of unchecked authority. instead, he says, separation of powers *demands* unchecked authority.
29 replies
300 reposts
1476 likes
He said "I will obey the law but any other president might not," which, dude, you're 80 years old. If you're the last good one, we're fucked.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
to put a sharper point on this, the President’s power to pass an executive order regulating emissions is severely hampered. his power to use the DOJ or the military to regulate emissions is nearly unlimited
18 replies
88 reposts
517 likes
The speech I just watched seemed to boil down to "the voters have to vote against Trump." Nothing about reining in the court, nothing about any damn thing he's going to do. Way to telegraph helplessness.
0 replies
13 reposts
56 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
a good way to alleviate concerns about Bidens debate performance / age *and* concerns about court overreach would be for Team Biden to schedule a short TV speech on it and give a firebrand performance about what he intends to do about it
just sayin
31 replies
68 reposts
612 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
my fellow americans, for my first official act with no criminal oversight I’m going to make mitch mcconnell box a kangaroo in the octagon
30 replies
134 reposts
999 likes
The monarch, but not the PM?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Is there any other functioning democracy today tat has a standard of "absolute immunity" for its head of state? I'm curious how our friends and allies around the world are going to perceive this.
3 replies
3 reposts
10 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
If there were ever a time for malicious compliance, this is it.
0 replies
1 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
maybe seizing and arresting the Supreme Court majority for aiding and abetting an attempt to overthrow the U.S. government can be a "core constitutional duty" and an "official act," why not
48 replies
497 reposts
1885 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
Not that anyone particularly cares about original meaning, but think folks should still say it out loud: For all of the things that are unclear in the founding documents and unknowabilities of what the Founders intended, "the President can kill anyone or commit a coup" was *never* legally arguable
19 replies
233 reposts
1172 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
Clarence Thomas unquestionably committed tax fraud on his motorcoach deal and the president has the power to put him in handcuffs this afternoon, in his official capacity in charge of the IRS and federal law enforcement
45 replies
623 reposts
2557 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
The thing I can't stop thinking about is this: I'm 48, and in my adult lifetime there has been one Republican who won the popular vote. But I will probably spend the rest of my life under the authority of a Supreme Court dominated by hard right conservatives. How is that democracy?
67 replies
939 reposts
3632 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
The Supreme Court just overthrew the country and I’m still seeing headlines that are like “did you know Joe Biden is like, months older than his opponent?”
11 replies
166 reposts
805 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
I can’t believe the Supreme Court just ruled that the president can sleep outdoors in a public space.
38 replies
1184 reposts
4594 likes
Reposted by Susan (George) Schorn
This is the ball game folks, the authoritarian green light laid out in advance.
Congress will not impeach Trump. And SCOTUS now blesses him with extraordinary latitude to do whatever he wants in power.
A second administration will not be constrained by Congress, the courts, the bureaucracy or law.
27 replies
445 reposts
1066 likes