:dons librarian hat:
Digital preservation is more expensive than preserving paper; it takes more staff, active attention, and consistent computing resources. Libraries have discussed “digital dark age” since the 1990s.
Corp archives often 1st to go b/c suits haven’t figured out how to profit.
I'm beginning to feel better about the fact that I take each year's blog entries and turn them into a POD book. I've done that since 2004 livejournal days
Ugh, yes. I work for a very large university library and I always get asked why we need to have so many physical books when everything’s online now. This is why!!
All preservation is fighting against clawing entropy, I think many people imagine digital storage as immune to this but it just isn't true.
Preservation is a process, not an end state regardless of format. Formats with the least barriers ensure the highest chance of a work surviving
Working at an archive digitalisation project, it cannot be overstated how fast digital archives disappear into the void unless there’s staff actively working to keep it alive – in a neglected paper archive you can usually rescue *something*, digital is just gone.
Yeah, the way a lot of paper archives persist past the moment short-sighted executives see a use for them is that it's often cheaper to just leave them wherever they are than it is to have someone come get rid of them. With digital archives a lot of this stuff is actively costing money to maintain.
Indeed. I feel this goes for a lot of digital content, games as well. There are a lot of older arcade games which have not been preserved yet, as in dumped to roms & if it does not happen they might be lost forever, w/ sourcecodes already gone. Capitalism does not care about preservation. No profit.
Years and years ago I was at C— University in the kafkaesque named “Bibliographic Control Division” I was responsible for changing the catalog records of the newly “digitized” books , pulling their physical catalog card, and then dumping the book in the trash.
I made working in television seem fun
I've kept most of my digital business records for 30 years and at least one of the machines I need to be able to read them. I have printed everything possible. It's not possible to print video. Digital preservation requires both the media and the tools to display it. It's not simple.
I'm at a tiny place and deal directly with the Board, so every time there is a new member I get to explain why I don't just digitize everything, why the cloud isn't the answer, what it actually costs, why I still print our most vital documents on paper...
Hm. I feel like I should go and print out my Google Drive worth of documents I don't ever want to lose, but having just cleaned out the garage of my deceased father, I also don't want to leave a pile of shit for my kids to have to deal with.
Archiving is so hard in terms of deciding what to keep.
I hate how much time it takes, but at this point, I keep a copy (and backups!) of anything I'll want to keep. Like, it'd be nice to use streaming services and have everyone share a single data source and not need to make copies of everything, but I don't trust having access to that stuff.
*shudders in digitizing in ABBYY and having to verify that no, that ampersand is not the number 4 and that number 4 isn't an ampersand for several straight hours*
Digital archivist here: we constantly have to explain to every faculty member proposing digital projects that said project is more like a puppy than a book--it requires constant care and attention right up until the day it dies. In other words: someone has to pay for every minute it remains standing
it was never going to be called the kindle of eli... cmos/clock battery would av been dead *discontinued* os updates not found ssl certs out of date ect
It's not a technological problem either - we have tape and optical discs that are designed to last for decades. It's all a matter of will, and like you mentioned, the only motivator these days is profit