i'm getting so, so tired of the doomerism on here, and the press loves covering shit like a horse race instead of explaining fundamentals and what's at play, a job that seems to fall to @golikehellmachine.com on here.
so here's a thread about why i'd rather be biden — yes, biden — right now
7 replies
135 reposts
392 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
a thing to remember, in all of this horror, is that these are not the actions of a political party that is confident it represents the will of the people, and who is currently out of power and enslaved to a deeply flawed avatar. the struggle is not over and they have not won
54 replies
954 reposts
3186 likes
In a perfect world, we also have a block-by-block survey of DC ready so that the Harvard Law Review-published plan for substantially amending the Constitution can be enacted:
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It's Wilhoit's law. It always has been.
("Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.")
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
The thing I can't stop thinking about is this: I'm 48, and in my adult lifetime there has been one Republican who won the popular vote. But I will probably spend the rest of my life under the authority of a Supreme Court dominated by hard right conservatives. How is that democracy?
67 replies
939 reposts
3633 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
A fun thought experiment is imagining how the US press would be describing this if it was happening in another country - say, Iran for example - if the US press still bothered covering other countries
7 replies
70 reposts
385 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
Anyone who thought the Court was salvageable after Shelby County was delusional.
0 replies
3 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
Unlike anybody under 50, most of the Democratic leadership has memories of a time when the Court was not explicitly hostile to democracy, which turns out has given them a PRETTY BIG blind spot.
1 replies
3 reposts
45 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
Oh, incidentally, I think we’ve resolved the “what if Fox News had existed during Watergate” counterfactual?”
0 replies
4 reposts
18 likes
I would go further and flatten the federal bench so that every judge defaults to trial court. Rotate them through single term appellate panels with each panel (a) deciding cases selected by previous panels and (b) selecting cases for the next panel to decide. No chief justice at all.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
all of this for donald fucking trump of all people
92 replies
478 reposts
3063 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
SCOTUS is telling us that it has completely signed on to the project of a second Trump administration, which is establishing an elected autocracy.
48 replies
700 reposts
2858 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
This Originalist™ court has effectively immunized both the president and all federal law enforcement officers from any meaningful accountability.
Because if there are two things the Founders cherished, it's the power of a king-like executive and armed agents of the government to act with impunity.
13 replies
338 reposts
1155 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
This Supreme Court should not be allowed to readjourn with the same amount of justices it ended this session with. Whatever form that takes I’m fine with.
3 replies
39 reposts
227 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
i have so much boundless contempt for these pathetic white men, who were blessed enough to be born in one of the few attempts at multiracial democracy in the world, and who panic at being no more valued than anyone else to the extent that they'd blow it all up and go back to divine right of kings
5 replies
131 reposts
610 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
Feel like "we are setting ourselves up as monarchs unaccountable to the American people" is pretty ballsy leading into the July 4th weekend.
2 replies
78 reposts
467 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
We probably ought to have a conversation about a partisan court declaring Trump above the rule of law that is at least as intense as the one we've had about Joe Biden being very old.
11 replies
169 reposts
529 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
In a lot of ways the entire Republican establishment since the 70s has been dedicated to making sure that what happened to Nixon would never be allowed to happen to one of theirs again
12 replies
249 reposts
967 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
maybe seizing and arresting the Supreme Court majority for aiding and abetting an attempt to overthrow the U.S. government can be a "core constitutional duty" and an "official act," why not
48 replies
497 reposts
1885 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
Fwiw the obstacle to "the President drone strikes an opponent" isn't and was never fear of prosecution after leaving office, but their ability to have clearly illegal orders carried out. This is similar to the "you don't need to pass a law to have the power to stop a coup" priniciple.
9 replies
15 reposts
130 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
The Supreme Court has sided with Nixon in Frost v. Nixon.
7 replies
44 reposts
371 likes
Ordering the military to do anything up to and including shooting a whole bunch of US citizens? Presumptive immunity.
1 replies
2 reposts
30 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
Roberts rules for Trump. Absolute immunity for “official acts.” Vacated and remanded. Party line case. Both Sotomayor and Jackson dissent. Fuck this. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
37 replies
146 reposts
529 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
There is something really fishy here and it smells like it's coming from Evo
0 replies
3 reposts
10 likes
Reposted by Jonathan Zaworski
once again i think that mark lemley’s article on the “imperial supreme court” is the most perceptive thing written about the roberts court and its overarching project harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-13...
8 replies
168 reposts
482 likes