Yeah it’s not like we’ll see a repeat of 1968, when the Democrats downshifted to a Vice President at a convention in Chicago that was plagued by protests against the party’s support for an unpopular foreign war and wound up creating an opening for a candidate they’d beat before.
Totally different!
1968 was a close thing that was marred partly by the VP's own actions and refusal to fight hard. While Kamala may easily make some of the same mistakes she will absolutely not pull back where Humphrey did.
No, no, no. This time is different because in 1968, there was *also* a huge conservative backlash to significant gains in gender and racial equali…
Wait. I'm being handed some new information here.
1968 was largely about policy too. But now is about a person. Yet, they aren't asking Biden to resign now. If there were genuine concerns about abilities to lead, they'd do that, right?
But this time it's different. Trump commits crimes, doesn't respect norms, and targets his critics... but with Stephen Miller in his ear, not Kissinger. So, where was I?
The more I think about it, the more I believe all this bullshit Biden is taking from the establishment might wind up helping him.
It is hard to paint someone as an establishment crony when the most casual observer can see the establishment hates you.
I'm liking the Gandalf/Saruman comparison. G forgot who he was, forgot the password for the doorway, but S led an insurrection of orcs against Helm's Deep and Gandalf brought the Rohirrim to aid. Not voting for G due to age or protest is dumb at this point. There needs to be a solid rebuke of S.
And: in (at least) WI and OH, state officials who are movement Republicans will certainly enforce state laws about when the nominee has to be chosen to get onto the ballot? They'll win those fights. How's that work for branding Democrats for the undecided voters who haven't already chosen Not Trump?
Finding the worst part about adulthood is that, as a child you’re repeatedly told “those who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it,” so you learn your history, only to find that because you lack power, you’re still doomed to repeat it
Given all of Trump’s awkward ties to Nixon, it would almost be poetry if wasn’t going to 99.9% tragedy (0.01% comedy, but some of the darkest gallows shit ever)
But it’s different this time because in ‘68 the Republican was an unprincipled crook who would do anything to get and keep power and sorry hold on I’m being handed a note
I've invoked Will Rogers on the disorganization of the D party since I started voting ('68? '70? '72? - whenever I was first eligible to vote in MI.)
I'd REALLY like to retire that cold-comfort quote from my repertory, but events continue to have other plans for us.
To my eye there's one gigantic difference: intra-party fracture had LBJ fighting a figurative two-front war. For now it seems the party plans to maintain unity behind Biden.
You've forgotten more about this than I'll ever know–am I misunderstanding a key difference?