Reposted by StatsJew
when you vote for President you are voting for a coalition rather than a person.
the right understands this very well, which is why evangelicals lined up behind Trump.
17 replies
85 reposts
309 likes
I mention use disorder meds because Opioid overdose is a *huge* problem for people leaving prison. They can't continue their meds, they're stressed out by trying to put their life together, and they go back to opioids. But they don't have the tolerance they had before and take too much.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Which is why "both parties are the same" makes me so angry. Are there things where I think Dems could be better on? Of course. But at least they generally care about making people's lives better and fixing real problems.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
This is crucial, because it means people getting out of prison can get their important medications right away (including psychiatric and use disorder meds), rather than waiting for paperwork. One less barrier to getting back on track after prison.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
The real differences between administrations are often felt most in the little things. I just got notification that the Biden administration is extending Medicaid coverage to prisoners in a number of states.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
I bring this up over and over again but the Paris Communards burned the guillotines in effigy understanding they represented not class struggle but tyranny
2 replies
8 reposts
81 likes
I think Americans actually really value democracy deep down, and they think there is a bad economy because they can't admit that their bedrock assumptions about American democracy are currently wobbling.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Also, I went to a small school without a meteorology department, so the class was just taught by a Geography professor who liked meteorology as a hobby (because he sailed and flew small planes). Very chill class.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I ended up taking meteorology: great class to enhance your understanding of everyday things
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
I’ve seen a lot of “X won’t solve the problem, Y will” and with respect, nothing we individually can do will solve the problem, which is why the problem is not solved.
The thing we can do is to solve problems together.
8 replies
65 reposts
348 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
Not for nothing, but NOAA Corps. is one of the eight uniformed services. Biden has unlimited power to direct NOAA to regulate fisheries through imperial fiat. Caesar Americana.
3 replies
10 reposts
55 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
reflecting on the immunity decision a bit, what the Court seems to be saying is that every element of the executive branch is at the President’s disposal, no matter what he wants to use it for. his motives don’t matter. the office is a weapon to be wielded however he sees fit.
73 replies
276 reposts
1871 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
The thing about Tractor Supply is that it's recent growth is driven almost entirely by chicken sales, to the tune of 11 million chickens a quarter.
Chickens, famously, are pretty good at making more chickens.
Lowes, which has a pretty good DEI record, now sells chicken feed and supplies.
6 replies
19 reposts
72 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
If there was a UK Prime Minister who I agreed with on 95% of things and his main opponent was Nigel Farage but the 5% was something that I find particularly grotesque and nasty then sorry, but I am at liberty to fucking hate him while also demanding people vote for him, and you can't stop me
0 replies
2 reposts
30 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
Two immediate thoughts:
- Presidents have been able to get away with *a lot*, so to some extent, this codifies the (very, very bad!) status quo
- BUT ALSO: To officially codify presidential immunity in this way, with reference to this specific situation (an attempted coup!) is utterly terrifying
4 replies
24 reposts
125 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
Once again, the problem is not any theory of constitutional interpretation, because they don't use any consistently. It is that the Republicans on SCOTUS pick and choose and rationalize whatever reasoning is necessary to rule in favor of Republicans.
3 replies
30 reposts
107 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
At this point, it is 100% undeniable that the Supreme Court majority is attempting to destroy democracy and seize total power over the US. They're not even trying to hide it.
Since the media refuses to clearly convey this fact to the public, tell everyone you know.
6 replies
242 reposts
647 likes
wrapunzel.com/store/rainbo...
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Rainbow tichel for Pride today (hopefully thunderstorms don't cancel the party)
4 replies
0 reposts
16 likes
Super-preliminary analysis of ppl who wrote in an a-spec identity in our 2023 health survey:
-70% afab
-10% trans
-50% under age 26
- more likely to be white and highly educated
-high rates of depression and mental illness
Hoping to put out some real data sometime this year.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
Today I heard someone give a talk about US and Israeli flags in synagogues — something I also don’t like — but then they were like, “Every time I see the American flag I feel like acid is being thrown at me,” and it was like… okay buddy get a grip.
5 replies
3 reposts
58 likes
Sometimes I imagine how much farther along we'd be on beating back climate change if we had a president Gore instead of Bush
1 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
The correct response to Chevron being overturned is for every single environmental group to start filing millions of lawsuits, right now, today, arguing that various regulatory decisions didn't go far enough.
Absolutely flood the zone.
35 replies
1080 reposts
3313 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
Every morning I check the news and it's like
-SCOTUS Eliminates Three More Basic Rights, Only Six Remain
-President Mispronounces a Word, Will Now Lose Election to Senile Hitler
-New AI Company Uses Artist Blood to Let Billionaires and Racists Live Forever, Gets $45 Billion Valuation
45 replies
1638 reposts
4244 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
I don't want some egghead bureaucrat telling me whether there's poison in the water I drink. Ideally I'd want that decided by a 29yo judge who went to a "biblical law school" and does not believe dinosaurs existed, and then to have that decision reaffirmed six years later by the Supreme Court.
73 replies
1483 reposts
5164 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
I should probably do this after caffeine but fuck it.
We're seeing a lot of horrible things come to fruition at once that have been *most of my life* in the making and I am not young. I'm seeing a lot of "I won't vote for anyone who can't fix X" when X was set in motion in the 80s, Or the 40s.
10 replies
109 reposts
471 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
The right wing majority on scotus legalizes bribery and criminalizes homelessness because to them, rich people deserve rights and poor people deserve nothing. If they were deserving they’d be rich.
51 replies
591 reposts
1828 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
"If the court overturns Chevron, it will have aggrandized its own power at the expense of Congress, the administrative state, and the president, and thrown critical day-to-day decisions necessary to implement scores of federal statutes to the federal judiciary."
1 replies
10 reposts
37 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
Well, Chevron getting overruled is really bad.
www.cnn.com/2024/06/28/p...
17 replies
42 reposts
206 likes
Reposted by StatsJew
"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges"
13 replies
125 reposts
383 likes
So, if congress says: create an agency made up of financial experts to regulate bitcoin and other similar financial schemes, then the court can question any rule it makes.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Right, but more practically, it means it is impossible for congress to make laws to be administered by the executive. Congress cannot foresee everything, and they don't have the expertise for a lot of rule making.
2 replies
0 reposts
3 likes