If you’re interviewing a theocrat who says “all our laws are based on the Ten Commandments” and you don’t immediately ask them to provide evidence and examples for that laughably stupid claim, just go ahead and quit your job.
Let’s rank ancient legal and moral traditions by their impact on US law:
1. Germanic Pagan
2. Roman Pagan
3. Greek Pagan
4. Hebrew
5. Native North American
6. Muslim
7. Zoroastrian
8. Indian Hindu/Buddist/Jain
9. Chinese Confucian/legalism
10. Mezoamerican
The basis of our law is broad.
Wait, why are they working on a Sunday? Doesn't the 4th Commandment count? How dare they hold rallies on the day of rest, forcing all those security people and other staff to work instead of "keeping the "Sabbath holy" (not to mention not all Christians agree the Sabbath is Sunday)
One suspects in short order we will be referring to a number of reporters as stenographers, for they do little more than repackage press releases and regurgitate nonsense from non-credible sources without providing analysis.
"Which Commandments? Which tablets? Which time? You know there were like six hundred, right? No? You didn't read that? Did you John 5:10? I'm gonna guess you ain't read that."
And also, several of the commandments are not represented in our laws at all! Where are the laws about respecting your parents? Where are the laws about coveting? They don't exist!
My favorite is when reporters interview people who claim to be faithful Christians, churchgoers, etc., and they never, ever follow up with: "And how often do you go to church?"
People who claim this kind of thing always baffle me. You can't tell right from wrong on your own? Only in some religious context? You don't have your own moral compass, you just borrow one and go based on vibes from there?
I think the bigger problem is that at least 3, 5 depending on which 10 commandments are referred to, directly contradict the 1st Ammendment. And that isn't even getting into the separation of state and church which completely breaks this bananas notion.
Only 3/10 are illegal at all (murder, stealing, false witness), and the constitution goes out of its way to ensure laws /can't/ be based on several others. Such a dumb claim
FYI - Here's a quick response to faulty claims that our laws are based on Christian 10 Commandments. It's like Noah's magic zoo boat - you can believe it if you want, but it doesn't make it true. #10Commandmentsyoutu.be/eWrdy1z-IB4?...
one quote had the politician saying the 10 Commandments were the first laws, from Moses, and I would like to have asked the gentleman if he had heard that Moses in those same scriptures was said to be from Egypt, i.e. already existed, and had laws, b/c that seems a pretty big part of the Moses story
Oh sure, our government created labor laws in deference to the command to keep the Sabbath and not because workers literally died for us to have weekends.
Also, the fact that some versions of the Ten Commandments are thousands of years old is irrelevant at best.
I mean, so is slavery.
(Though some of them may take that as a positive example.)
My favorite bit from someone trying to make a theocracy:
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture" - Rev. Ray Mummert, Dover creationist.
Makes me wonder why Alvin Bragg didn't go ahead and get that adultery conviction on the record against Trump while he was doing the phony business records case.
That complete POS is running for Congress here and he has a whole bunch of daughters too! Wonder how he'd feel if something happened at home...🤔🤔 (probably never hear about it)
They're just repeating something they've heard a million times in Sunday sermons. Not sure why people worry so much about AI merely parroting stuff and filling in gaps with nonsense, given that the people we put in charge have been doing that forever.
Exhibit 5,382 of “most reporters are ignorant of Movement Evangelicalism”.
They either cede the point because they believe it to be genuine, or because they don’t feel confident in their own ability to fact-check… when meanwhile this was never really about factual claims in the first place.
the fixation on the Ten Commandments is particularly weird because there are plenty of good civic principles like "pay your workers on time" and "it's the owner's responsibility to keep a dangerous animal confined" and "standardize weights & measures" that have correspondents ELSEWHERE in Scripture.
You forget the Sermon on the Mount "blessed are the journalists who maintain access, for they shall inherit the few remaining positions when the news downsizes"
The obvious first question, right from the first commandment, is "Which religions are you banning? Will you be keeping the Methodists, or the Baptists?"