in a country founded directly on "no kings, fuck kings in particular" it is beyond insulting that supposed "originalist" judges are taking seriously the proposition that the President is in fact a king
even though ive left the religion, it reminds me kind of of old Bible stories with the israelites asking god for a king only for every king they ever had being a huge evil prick after they got power. not exactly the same situation here but similar
I always thought it was ironic that the fuck kings country only really supports monarchies in the Arab world and activley helps supress revolution in the name of democracy.
Me squawking this morning while listening “But NO ONE is above the law. That is LITERALLY the basis this country was founded on.
-No seizing of land
-No summarily executing people
-No just seizing assets
(Without due process. Those issues are another story for another day, tho.)
It's the authoritarian core of modern conservatism, which is part of what motivates the conservative legal movement that placed 6 justices. And that movement that laid the intellectual scaffolding for reclaiming the monarchical powers somehow in the Const. for the President. See David Addington.
Exposes the hypocrisy in Originalism, since contextualizing that era would definitely prove that "hey, kings are bad, specifically" is the milieu. Ignoring that in favor of a specific outcome that is antithetical to the American experiment should be the death knell for originalism.
EXACTLY!!!! Why is there not more coverage of this point! The early Americans were escaping the landlord, peasant, oligarchy, feudal, systems of Europe, their ancestors would turn in their grave to think their descents are enabling the same yokes and chains
There vote has nothing really to do with the subject (is a president a king). We know the answer.
Their vote is to decide if the US Supreme Court is still valid.
That's crazy talk him getting immunity then he could have his secret service kill anyone he wants. It's a double edged sword I don't think trump thought, immunity would go to Biden too and he could get trump before he tries on him. He could do it to his whole family and get away with it.
The founders are always used as a retroactive justification. An originalist is someone who says my beliefs on government are correct, therefore it’s what the forefathers meant when the my wrote the constitution.
It's surreal that the music I'm listening to this morning feels topical again:
"So beware of their banners and the general's lies
There's no glory for the poor man, no glittering prize
For we gave all we had, now our homes they fall down
And I cry out "Republic" and allegiance to no crown"
Isn't the whole idea of the infallibility of the founders — those "amazing", future-proofed dudes steampunking around the Potomac — something akin to "the king is God and can't be wrong"? Ultimately, they (scotus) are all monarchists in disguise, me thinks.
I think the founders just wanted to be kings themselves. To own vast estates of land they stole, have it worked by people they own. All of it justified by the church. Little micro-kings. Sounds cute, but it wasn't.
A pre Magna Carta King or a French King at that.
The Supremes must know the inevitable conclusion to that form of governance. I’m not entirely opposed where the principals of this story are concerned.
Hum, was about to say something smug about British royalty getting done for driving offences, but there's some broken stuff here really quite recently. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024...
This has always been about the arrogant dismissal of the rule of law by those who have been entrusted with the power to uphold it but who enjoy finding the means to be exempted from it.
The conservative justices all but yelled aloud today “L'État, c'est moi!”
Speaking of kings - if this turd gets a second term, the Supreme Court will not be treated with the idiotic deference we see from this feckless administration. The minute they issue a ruling that tRump doesn’t like we’ll hear about why it’s actually voluntary to abide by their rulings. Which it is.
The Counter Revolution won after Reconstruction wasn't followed through. Liberals call us bloody-minded, but this is what you reap when you spare the kulaks.
Bill Barr did a whole speech about how "actually the founders were scared of parliament and the constitution exists to protect presidents from the wicked Congress"
I’m not convinced they don’t all go back to their chambers and ask their law clerks “what’s the most insulting and damaging opinion we could hand down? Ok, cool let’s go with that”
Easy to explain.
"originalist" never has meant anything other than "return to the middle ages".
A civilized society would treat those people like one would treat people in those ages, drawing & quartering for all the division they sow.
Also needs to be said repeatedly: *These conservative SCOTUS Justices are only making “pro-king” arguments for their party’s president*
No chance they’d even take this case if it was Biden arguing that presidents get full immunity.
They’re unserious, cynical people, acting in partisan bad faith.
like I'm sorry these people are the ones who spend all their time talking about how the inviolable intent of the founders is the only thing that matters
there aren't a lot of things that the founders agreed on but "fuck kings" was about as close a consensus position as you could find!
This country was literally founded to get away from king rule. SCROTUS is lost to zealotry and trump-fellation. The only remedy is stacking the court to at least 13, while opening investigations into Thomas and Rapey-Kav (at the very least)
umm.. one slight quibble here - they're saying the President is allowed to be a king as long as he's a Republican. I think we can all agree they'd be approaching this case very differently if a Dem president was before them
(apologies if this point already made above & I overlooked it).
You say it's founded on that principle, but in practice it takes surprisingly few generations to forget such things...
Really striking to hear an entire culture founded by immigrants turn into "we gotta keep immigrants outta here!"
I guess that's the difference between refugees and colonizers.
A reminder that the Roman Republic was founded directly on "no kings, fuck kings in particular," with Julius Caesar refusing a crown, saying "I am not king, I am Caesar." So they named him "dictator for life" instead, and his successors took absolute monarchical power as "Caesar" rather than "king."
They are Royalists. This shitty stain has been with us since the founding, and you find it in exactly the fetid cesspools you'd expect, including most but thankfully not all of the founders.
Trump always makes me think of the parable of the Golden Calf. Not just because of his skin tone, but also in that so many idiots are so smitten with him that I also want to smash the Rule of Law and stick the remnants in my face-melting machine where no one can get at it.
I saw someone else say it, but they are absolutely going to craft the world's finest distinction to disallow prosecution of Trump while still allowing prosecution of Biden.