"over the past 20 years, the Republican-nominated Supreme Court justices who have now given Trump and other presidents a significant measure of immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts assured Americans that nobody — not even a president — was 'above the law.'"
2 replies
11 reposts
24 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
I like presidents who didn’t rape children.
2 replies
12 reposts
52 likes
Is this real? www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegat...
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I think they are just bad people. They have bad principles and in times like these it shows.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Dude, Biden is old. He is still 1000000x better than trump. Both things are true. The thing is see though is a media that has normalized trump and will spend 120% of political coverage on Biden’s age (also ignoring trumps own decline). This is the “but her emails” comparison
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
I disagree.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I don’t disagree. I think he has been the best president we’ve had in many decades, but he only had one term in him. He should have seen that and passed on the torch much, much sooner.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I saw the same thing, but don’t you think the focus is excessive, especially without comparing the cognitive issues with trump? Or his crimes? It doesn’t seem like an honest comparison, just media piling on.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
This is the “but her emails” all over again. The media is playing the same tune
1 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
under the opinion in trump v. united states there was no need for john yoo to come up with an elaborate justification for torture. george w. bush could have ordered an interrogator to crush the testicles of a child, no questions asked.
11 replies
120 reposts
703 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
Yep. One of the biggest blind spots people have is assuming that underneath, others share the same basic values as them. They have trouble imagining an ideology that is completely misaligned with theirs.
31 replies
576 reposts
2031 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
Classic American political dialogue is premised on the idea that we share fundamental values but disagree on how best to promote them.
I haven’t believed this for a while. Other than “I prefer to be alive and not dead” and “I like pudding,” I do not share values with these people.
53 replies
289 reposts
1688 likes
Yeah but on the other hand here is a list of things that are more important than murder-kings: emails and age
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Funny how we all see this SCOTUS inventing laws and rewriting the constitution, but despite being shocked we just transition to accepting it as the law of the land and move on. Why should we give legitimacy? Because we believe in a system that they destroyed?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The SCOTUS has betrayed America. I want much more from democrats and loyal republicans. Biden needs to lead the party and tell us the plan to restore our system. We need more than “vote for me or we are all lost”. Eventually they’ll win an election, so what to do about an insane dictatorship court?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
19 replies
900 reposts
2790 likes
What democratic presidents? This is the last one
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
reflecting on the immunity decision a bit, what the Court seems to be saying is that every element of the executive branch is at the President’s disposal, no matter what he wants to use it for. his motives don’t matter. the office is a weapon to be wielded however he sees fit.
73 replies
276 reposts
1871 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
There are two elements to the immunity decision that are particularly extreme in a way that many will miss: (1) motive is irrelevant and (2) immune acts are not just excluded from prosecution, they’re excluded from evidence.
/1
50 replies
905 reposts
2436 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
The Supreme Court’s ruling putting presidents above the law must be understood not simply as a grant of immunity for past crimes, but an enthusiastic endorsement of those he will commit if given the chance. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
25 replies
523 reposts
1424 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
I think about this line a lot these days.
17 replies
415 reposts
1689 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
It's just hilariously disingenuous. Imagine looking at, say, ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY and concluding that the biggest threat to liberty isn't abuse of power, but powerful people refraining from sufficiently wielding their authority out of fear that they might one day be held accountable.
21 replies
385 reposts
1555 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
The 14th Amendment says if you were involved in an insurrection you can't be president. SCOTUS said they won't allow anyone to enforce that because of reasons they made up.
The Constitution doesn't say the president is immune from criminal law. SCOTUS decided he is because of reasons they made up.
72 replies
1116 reposts
3719 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
The words in the constitution don't give the president immunity, nor was that the intention of the authors. But you must understand that the meaning of the constitutional vibes have evolved over time in a way only I can detect. Now there are penubras and emanations that tell me he is in fact immune.
7 replies
85 reposts
701 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
My first read: If a president commits crimes unrelated to him being the most powerful person in the world, he can be prosecuted. But if explicitly uses his powers to commit crimes, he is at least presumptively, and probably absolutely immune from prosecution.
I mean, holy shit.
28 replies
218 reposts
938 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
Homeless people can be arrested for sleeping, Presidents cannot be arrested for rampant graft and corruption done while in office.
There is no clearer a summary of "conservative 'law and order'" than this.
14 replies
592 reposts
1466 likes
“The Aristocrats!” I mean, “Official Acts!”
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
I can’t believe the Supreme Court just ruled that the president can sleep outdoors in a public space.
38 replies
1184 reposts
4594 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
NYT: Joe should quit, he stutters
Philly Inquirer: Trump is a fucking criminal what the fuck are we doing here
79 replies
1531 reposts
4504 likes
That’s the point though. They don’t want the government to work. It’s drowning in the bathtub, and it just took a big gulp of water
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
The Philadelphia Inquirer gets it right.
x.com/adambonin/st...
58 replies
762 reposts
3007 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
I don’t recall the NYT calling for Trump to step down after being convicted of 34 counts of fraud and being called by a judge at his civil trial a rapist in the common person sense
19 replies
312 reposts
1384 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
A few years ago, Jon Lovett floated a theory that media treats Democrats like protagonists - to be challenged, accounted, and forced to be behave in growth-oriented ways - while the GOP are treated like antagonists - immutable, expected to disrupt, thematic obstacles.
Thinking about that a lot.
71 replies
1215 reposts
3744 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
Oh and the "historical context of our country" is that the Founding Fathers knew from hard personal experience that the mixing of religion and government had caused centuries of war and chaos across Europe, so when they set up a new country here THEY VERY EXPLICITLY DID NOT DO THAT.
14 replies
148 reposts
639 likes
Cannon: Can anyone ever truly judge anything? Maybe all we can do is hear each other and let time go by, living. Who is to say what “the law” says or means. Just vibe and live!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Boring Knucklehead
1 replies
5 reposts
21 likes
The wizards are the Fed governors . Gandalf is Powell
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes