Love this story: Air Canada's chatbot gives false advice on booking a bereavement ticket, guy gets screwed, then Air Canada then argues its chatbot is a SEPARATE LEGAL ENTITY FROM THEM THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS OWN ACTIONS. lol wut
Ask any Canadian about Air Canada. I dare you. You would be taking your life in your hands. Few topics will drive us Canadians to acts of violence like the mere mention of Air Canada.
I’m (mostly) joking but if there’s one thing that unites us as a country, it’s that Air Canada sucks.
All right. If we accept their claim on face value, can we file charges against AC for employing a minor? harboring an unregistered immigrant? slave labour? (did they PAY the poor chat bor?)
I really don't think they thought this through.
Okay, time to ban that chatbot from associating with any customer anywhere ever. That means if it's not 100% developed and programmed in house, that's gonna hurt the original source a lot more.
The weird thing about this is that AC absolutely provides retroactive refunds on bereavement grounds. I deal with AC in a refund-handling capacity daily and can point to a file right now where they did this. But in true AC fashion there is zero consistency between teams and departments.
Love how we’ve gone from “A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer must never make a management decision” to “A computer can never be held accountable, therefore a computer should make all management decisions.”
There was a class in Uni for my CS degree that was about the business of programming. The first day was all about the ethics of what we do.
Computers cannot be held accountable so it cant decide/relay policy. ML is a shadow of human intelligence. Just as unpredictable but with none of the cognizance
can't help but notice that basically all innovations in corporate customer service for as long as I've lived have been ways to try to avoid accountability
Interesting that this was settled in small claims court. I'm wondering how this would have played out in a higher court, with judges who have a correspondingly higher sense of their own importance. (And a full-court legal press from the airline.)
Reminds me of time I purchased a rail discount card from the train company. I had never had one so asked if it would work for my normal commute and the guy who sold it to me said yes.
Then when I tried to use it weeks later, it didn't. Company just kept telling me off for not reading t&cs
If it's a legal entity with responsibility for its actions, it it paid? Does it get a 40 hour work week? Health insurance? Standard vacation time? Can it quit and take a job with another airline?
Bold strategy. Sounds like it will only work if business law doesn’t have a long and robust history of dealing with individuals being agents of a business and working out how to apportion liability in those situations. Let’s see how this plays out….
Not only did that argument did not fly, the National Transportation Safety Board is now laying out the carefully-numbered remaining small burnt pieces of it on a tarp in a hangar.
I feel the companies desperate to play up the agency of these tin echo chamber machines would come down like a hammer on an actual AI’s rights should one ever exist.
“"This is a remarkable submission," Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) member Christopher Rivers wrote.”
Is that Canadian for “What the fuck is this bullshit?”
I mean, that almost feels like the Air Canda lawyer went "This is BS. How can I lose without getting fired?"
I mean, it's likely just normal corporate lawyer schmukitude, but this is so dumb other options are plausible ...
They also argued that hey, so what if the chatbot lied, because the correct info was available elsewhere on their site. The tribunal's response: "There is no reason why Mr. Moffatt [the guy who got screwed] should know that one section of Air Canada's webpage is accurate, and another is not"
lol
I literally just liked a post that said AI can't be held responsible, so when a company points to the empty management chair and said the AI told us to, it is a flat out cop out, and frankly in this case needs to be prosecuted.