Jon Farrington's avatar

Jon Farrington

@jonfarrington.bsky.social

30 followers 59 following 106 posts

Engineer, oyster farmer, Chesapeake Bay


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Joshua J. Friedman's avatar Joshua J. Friedman @joshuajfriedman.com
[ View ]

The GOP push to destabilize the 2024 election has already begun, with lawsuits filed in a host of states around familiar Trump talking points: mail-in ballots, supposed voter-registration fraud, etc. “This is how you build a story that enables political interference in the post-election process." 🎁

10 replies 134 reposts 294 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Justin Glawe's avatar Justin Glawe @justinglawe.bsky.social
[ View ]

Washoe County is the most pivotal county in the swing state of Nevada. Yesterday, election deniers there refused to certify election results, paving the way for conspiracist officials across the country to do the same in November. www.american-doom.com/p/breaking-r...

1 replies 10 reposts 12 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

L O L G O P's avatar L O L G O P @lolgop.bsky.social
[ View ]

I'm a single-issue voter. My single issue is that I'd like to continue voting.

5 replies 107 reposts 524 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Rima I Anabtawi's avatar Rima I Anabtawi @rimaanabtawi.bsky.social
[ View ]

Just dropped: Forthcoming remarks from VP Kamala Harris on Project 2025 and Trump in Vegas

10 replies 80 reposts 313 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

J.M. Berger's avatar J.M. Berger @intelwire.bsky.social
[ View ]

Can't get much more definitionally dehumanizing than "Unhumans"

5 replies 32 reposts 110 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Boston Tom Levenson's avatar Boston Tom Levenson @tomlevenson.bsky.social
[ View ]

How many Trump Cabinet members/senior staff have called on the US to reject him? Hint: it's a much larger number than D officials vs. Biden and you'd think that putting that counter alongside this one would be the minimum of balance required of an ethical news venue.

10 replies 92 reposts 343 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Michael Tae Sweeney's avatar Michael Tae Sweeney @mtsw.bsky.social
[ View ]

It's worth considering why the media - with many outlets funded by or directly owned by oil interests - does so many stories about difficulties of long road trips in EVs and so few about how you can fill your car up at home and never visit a gas station or charger ever. bsky.app/profile/tom4...

14 replies 13 reposts 105 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Bellingcat's avatar Bellingcat @bellingcat.com
[ View ]

Latest: An analysis of open source evidence, as well as multiple missile experts, have pointed to a Russian launched Kh-101 cruise missile being the weapon that struck a children’s hospital in Kyiv www.bellingcat.com/news/2024/07...

9 replies 238 reposts 478 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Reposted by Jon Farrington

Reposted by Jon Farrington

wade of mutilation's avatar wade of mutilation @waderockett.bsky.social
[ View ]

I will bang this drum forever: in THEY THOUGHT THEY WERE FREE: THE GERMANS, 1933-45 Milton Mayer interviewed 10 ordinary Germans after WW2 to learn how fascism took hold. There was never a moment when everyone woke up:

47 replies 1498 reposts 2788 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Michael Tae Sweeney's avatar Michael Tae Sweeney @mtsw.bsky.social
[ View ]

Donald Trump has good days and bad days but increasingly only bad days. He's lost it - he can't focus and his brains are leaking out his ears, but the press is very impressed with him because HE CAN STILL SHOUT

12 replies 99 reposts 532 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Hemry, Local Bartender's avatar Hemry, Local Bartender @bartenderhemry.bsky.social
[ View ]

"RETRUTH IF YOU WANT TELEVISED MILITARY TRIBUNALS" is, to me, a deranged and instantly disqualifying thing for a presidential candidate to say, but on the other hand joe biden looks and sounds very old

12 replies 234 reposts 873 likes


Jon Farrington's avatar Jon Farrington @jonfarrington.bsky.social
[ View ]

If it'll make Trump a king, then he's all for it.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Greg Sargent's avatar Greg Sargent @gregsargent.bsky.social
[ View ]

NEWS --> Mark Robinson, the MAGA extremist GOP nominee for governor in North Carolina, appeared to endorse political violence against unnamed foes in a recent speech.

"Some folks need killing!" he shouted. "It's a matter of necessity!"

Video and story here:
newrepublic.com/article/1834
...

110 replies 369 reposts 680 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Michael Tae Sweeney's avatar Michael Tae Sweeney @mtsw.bsky.social
[ View ]

Abusing the legal system is now a key tenet of conservative thought and action. They have unlimited money and wasting legal fees is the only downside of filing frivolous lawsuits (many of which will succeed anyway if they get in front of the right FedSoc judge)

4 replies 29 reposts 148 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Joe Katz's avatar Joe Katz @joekatz45.bsky.social
[ View ]

"They're just fearmongering about Project 2025," brought to you by the people behind "They're just fearmongering about a coup" and "they're just fearmongering about abortion bans"

61 replies 1077 reposts 3711 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

b-boy bouiebaisse's avatar b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie.bsky.social
[ View ]

i think akhil amar reed captures something very important, which is that the roberts court rewrote article ii, which explicitly states that a president can be held criminally liable after impeachment (and which has long been understood to mean that he can be held liable after leaving office)

23 replies 410 reposts 1260 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Pwnallthethings's avatar Pwnallthethings @pwnallthethings.bsky.social
[ View ]

occurs to me that bribing the president is now /always/ legal, since in every case the only way to distinguish gratuity from bribe is via evidence that could never be admissible

19 replies 113 reposts 489 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Lurk du Soleil's avatar Lurk du Soleil @lurkdusoleil.bsky.social
[ View ]

There is also every reason to think that this court will expand Trump v. U.S in his second term to extend immunity to those doing his bidding. I.e., “Our holding in Trump v. U.S. demands that government officials be able to enact the will of the executive without fear of criminal proceedings.”

12 replies 72 reposts 351 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Don Moynihan's avatar Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social
[ View ]

Honestly still in shock that the most crooked American President in history said "I need immunity" and the GOP Supreme Court said "well, it's nowhere in the constitution, but sure, why not? Whats the worst that could happen?"

81 replies 594 reposts 2916 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

b-boy bouiebaisse's avatar b-boy bouiebaisse @jbouie.bsky.social
[ View ]

these people do not intend to ever lose power again

137 replies 1278 reposts 4080 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Media Matters for America's avatar Media Matters for America @mmfa.bsky.social
[ View ]

Heritage Foundation president celebrates Supreme Court presidential immunity ruling: "We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be" www.mediamatters.org/project-2025...

259 replies 579 reposts 1110 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Seth Cotlar's avatar Seth Cotlar @sethcotlar.bsky.social
[ View ]

This guy with full immunity for “official acts,” plus the unlimited ability to pardon any official who would implement such orders = “limited government” Republican style.

13 replies 119 reposts 382 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Seth Cotlar's avatar Seth Cotlar @sethcotlar.bsky.social
[ View ]

Not only will Trump admin 2.0 be staffed with 100% MAGA loyalists eager to implement whatever Trump wants, but they also will have little reason to worry about laws that might constrain their most "enthusiastic" impulses. The norms long ago ceased constraining GOP behavior. Now the law won't either.

2 replies 19 reposts 58 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Elliot Blake's avatar Elliot Blake @elliotblake.bsky.social
[ View ]

He wasn’t going to be constrained by anything anyway, but this ruling gives him a veneer of lawfulness for his inevitable lawlessness should he return to office.

4 replies 14 reposts 41 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Greg Sargent's avatar Greg Sargent @gregsargent.bsky.social
[ View ]

Chilling point from @rickhasen.bsky.social on SCOTUS ruling and second Trump term, on today's pod:

"You want to know how far this opinion goes? Just wait six months. He's going to get advice as to what his maximal power is. We may find out sooner rather than later how far these powers go."

3 replies 22 reposts 70 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Dani Robbins's avatar Dani Robbins @danir.bsky.social
[ View ]

“The Court’s conservative majority has revealed itself to be the most direct threat to American democracy and any Democrat who is not ready to shelve old fears about “court packing” and get serious about expanding and reforming the Court isn’t made for this moment” @kevinmkruse.bsky.social

2 replies 44 reposts 155 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

hilzoy's avatar hilzoy @hilzoy.bsky.social
[ View ]

Jamelle Bouie: gift link.

0 replies 13 reposts 24 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Popehat's avatar Popehat @kenwhite.bsky.social
[ View ]

We just may have to come to grips with the idea we have a king, like Charles I or James II or Richard II.

109 replies 104 reposts 796 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Peter's avatar Peter @notalawyer.bsky.social
[ View ]

reflecting on the immunity decision a bit, what the Court seems to be saying is that every element of the executive branch is at the President’s disposal, no matter what he wants to use it for. his motives don’t matter. the office is a weapon to be wielded however he sees fit.

73 replies 276 reposts 1874 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Nicholas Wallace's avatar Nicholas Wallace @wallace.bsky.social
[ View ]

Absolutely wild that the court accuses the dissent of "fearmongering" with "extreme hypotheticals" when the actual basis for the indictment is a coup attempt that led to an attack on the capitol

43 replies 722 reposts 2271 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Quinta Jurecic's avatar Quinta Jurecic @qjurecic.bsky.social
[ View ]

now he is seeking a second term knowing that whatever he does, any criminal prosecution will be hung up for literal years in court if it ever gets off the ground in the first place. what do you think he is going to try to do?

7 replies 37 reposts 177 likes


Jon Farrington's avatar Jon Farrington @jonfarrington.bsky.social
[ View ]

Those originalist jurists inventing and bestowing king-light powers to the presidency for candidate who vows to be a "dictator on day one" Only SC reform will end this madness; until then every general election will be a referendum on whether democracy remains on life support, or we pull the plug.

0 replies 3 reposts 6 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Reposted by Jon Farrington

Pwnallthethings's avatar Pwnallthethings @pwnallthethings.bsky.social
[ View ]

"This Court has an expansive view of Executive Authority that is at odds with the system of government this country has always had. We are a nation with no need of Kings, and this opinion is there to bring them back for one man who has already vowed to be a dictator. I reject it wholesale"

1 replies 45 reposts 264 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Moira Donegan's avatar Moira Donegan @moiradonegan.bsky.social
[ View ]

Watching “The Pelican Brief” with John Roberts and making him tell me of every plot point is legal or not

2 replies 8 reposts 144 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Popehat's avatar Popehat @kenwhite.bsky.social
[ View ]

I don’t think it’s an exaggeration at all to say the decision threatens the Republic. I might not have said so in 2015, before I saw how triumphantly lawless and autocratic the President could be, and how so many people would applaud it or at least shrug.

42 replies 496 reposts 1694 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Vince Mpls's avatar Vince Mpls @vincempls.bsky.social
[ View ]

March 23 1933, the Enabling Act becomes law in Germany, giving the chief executive power enforce his own laws without checks and balances. The passing of the Act marked the formal transition from democratic republic to totalitarian dictatorship. 6 months later, it was a 1 party state.

38 replies 1177 reposts 2137 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Micah's avatar Micah @rincewind.run
[ View ]

I think this is the fundamental asymmetry underlying every aspect of the conflict between the parties; you see it in the Senate, in gerrymandering, in the use of executive power I don't want King Biden either, but it's long past time to make the GOP afraid of the consequences of endless escalation

26 replies 215 reposts 957 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Reposted by Jon Farrington

Don Moynihan's avatar Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social
[ View ]

If we have more NYT/WaPo op-eds calling on Biden to exit than on SCOTUS mainlining an authoritarian presidency, that will give you a good read on where we are.

15 replies 154 reposts 642 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Mitchell Epner's avatar Mitchell Epner @mitchellepner.bsky.social
[ View ]

My friend and colleague Ken White has written a great thread describing some (but far from all) of the enormous problems with today's decision by Chief Justice Roberts granting Donald Trump criminal immunity on grounds never before accepted by any court. Today's decision threatens the Republic.

6 replies 51 reposts 292 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Popehat's avatar Popehat @kenwhite.bsky.social
[ View ]

/8 At any rate, congratulations to the Federalist Society for an achievement beyond the reach of the British, outside the grasp of bloody civil war, impossible to Nazis and Soviets and terrorists: defeating the American idea.

40 replies 894 reposts 2791 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Corey Rayburn Yung's avatar Corey Rayburn Yung @coreyryung.bsky.social
[ View ]

Unitary-executive-brain likely means a lot of people won't recognize that this is a big deal. But, it is a BIG deal. Without DOJ independence, it can be used entirely as a very powerful political weapon by a President.

8 replies 31 reposts 68 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Reposted by Jon Farrington

Adam Serwer's avatar Adam Serwer @adamserwer.bsky.social
[ View ]

The Supreme Court’s ruling putting presidents above the law must be understood not simply as a grant of immunity for past crimes, but an enthusiastic endorsement of those he will commit if given the chance. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...

25 replies 523 reposts 1428 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Radley Balko's avatar Radley Balko @radleybalko.bsky.social
[ View ]

It's just hilariously disingenuous. Imagine looking at, say, ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY and concluding that the biggest threat to liberty isn't abuse of power, but powerful people refraining from sufficiently wielding their authority out of fear that they might one day be held accountable.

21 replies 385 reposts 1561 likes


Reposted by Jon Farrington

Eric Rauchway's avatar Eric Rauchway @rauchway.bsky.social
[ View ]

RICHARD NIXON: Listen, you all laughed when I said that if the president does it, that means that it is not illegal, BUT WHO’S LAUGHING NOW

8 replies 104 reposts 391 likes