I think the reason Philip K Dick is still the predominant SF writer of the last century is, he was the only one who foresaw a future where everything would be boring, inconvenient and dehumanising, and where the only way you can win is to somehow refuse to give up your humanity.
I remember a weirdly accurate prediction. Strangest I've ever seen:
Computer translation works... but poorly due to lack of context... So, bored people play games where they translate movie titles to Japanese, then back to English and try to guess what the original title was...
It was probably unfortunate that I was re-reading High Castle at the time of the 2019 GE but I ended up sitting up all night reading and drinking whisky and those memories will probably never leave me… 🤣🥴
People replying to this with “i prefer a different 20th century SF writer”, please realise that I am reading your replies in the annoying voice PKD gave to characters who say obvious things with immense confidence.
His book "Galactic Pot-Healer" predicted the boring and stupid ways we would use infinite computing power and communications ability.
"The cliche is inexperienced."
I unironically believe Verhoeven is in conversation with this and added a distinctly American ingredient: all of this will also be a tacky insult to our collective intelligence.
I think this is right. I went on a huge PKD binge a few years ago, and I think that this is the uniting thread of his books and more crucially, the nucleus of what it means to be human (for him anyway) is empathy.
Octavia Butler also
I have also read that the Pox was caused by accidentally coinciding climatic, economic, and sociological crises. It would be more honest to say that the Pox was caused by our own refusal to deal with obvious problems in those areas. We caused the problems: then we sat and watched
One of the things I love about Dick is the way his everyman characters are obsessed with collecting, for example, old opera 78s. Even in his bleakest futures, people would find pleasure and solace in the arts.
Didn’t he write a scene where a character’s own door demands he pay money for the convenience of leaving his own house? That scene has stuck with me ever since I first read it
Yes. Though a bit of a shame many think PKD equals the films based on his books. While I do love quite a few of them, not sure any of them get close to that very specific texture and tone of his books... though I should re-watch BARJO!
It all kinda started when creativity was recoined into "content making". Your art is now content, then your content is fodder for AI. It's all a word-label game. It's easier to give up content than art.
Genuinely waiting to open up my news app to learn that one of these “luxury” sardine can builders has finally gone and made people’s apartment doors subscription based.
In Galactic Pot-Healer he correctly predicted how in the future people would use the internet to fuck off at work. Like there was a brief fad where people did _exactly_ what Joe Chip does with his online friends, even though "online" wasn't even a thing in 1967.
He's the only one who grappled with modernity and what humanity would do with it. Not just "these toys are great" but "oh geez, what is the system of control going to do with them?"
c.f. Burroughs (though he's not often regarded as SF as genre, aldo much harder to read.)
The baby lands that the rich people had curators for in Now Wait For Next Year seem very relevant, though most baby lands in reality are self curated and with things that remind us of the past rather than being of the past.
Ubik's humorous depiction of microtransactions and how they affect one's relationship to the world is more prescient than most hard-nosed sci fi ever got.