We got tricked by science fiction into thinking a futuristic city is all about flying cars and crystal towers and hologram billboards but what it really looks like is nice apartment blocks, good mass transit, pedestrian zones with shade trees and safe bike lanes.
We got robbed by capitalists who told us these nice things aren't really possible and that we need to work harder so they can buy bigger yachts and take tourist trips to the lower atmosphere on the money that should be going to making working class lives better.
Pretty sure you’re going to get flying cars provided by predatory capitalists before you get any of that livable egalitarian earth-respecting dream city stuff.
I feel if you took the aesthetic of 1905 prior to the automobile, where infrastructure was built for the gens to come / society as a whole rather than indiv. Then updated it with modern tech and green energy sustainability. You'd be in a solid great future. Planting trees for shade you'll never see
even the dystopian science fiction is somehow cooler than our current dystopian.
Cyberpunk told us we'd have robot parts and retro cars, with neon lights, but nah all we got was NFTs, AI, and Corporate sterilization of everything.
By making the future sound like flying cars and hologram billboards, the people are more likely to accept it's unachievable. When it's nice apartments and good transport with shady green pedestrian zones, we realise it's completely achievable start to ask uncomfortable questions of our officials.
Could we make at least some of the apartment blocks out of crystal, though? It's a nice look, and it's probably too expensive to make the mass transit out of crystal.
TNG new what was up. Depictions of contemporary earth always looked like it was a big park that happened to have some star fleet headquarters and other buildings in it.
The Strugatsky brothers' Noon Universe setting includes some descriptions of ordinary cities, and it's a very different vision from Western SF for sure
The arrival of the taco truck is greeted with cheers of joy rather than ethnic slurs, and 'trucks' bigger than Humvees and smaller storage than a hatchback are driven out of town with jeers of derision.
Star Trek showed that achieving that utopia required as much work on the ground as it did in space. San Fransisco, Paris, and New Orleans all had people walking to shops and restaurants on their way to work, with clean air and public services. The big improvements were in society before technology.
Idk if SF tricked us as much as we tricked ourselves. As writers & readers, we grew so enamored with the mythic *means* that we've all but lost sight of their supposed ends.
Flying cars + holograms are exciting, even magical; 5-over-1s & free flu shots... not so much.
Can you blame us?
We didn't get tricked per se, we were being warned. The megacities with flying cars werent supposed to be desirable outcomes, but tech bros took the concepts as inspiration instead of models of caution
How suprising the by coca using 80's film makers envisioned future doesn't turn out to be real but the dellusions of the people that got kind of brainwashed of it are really real.
That’s not futurism tho, that’s socialism. As someone living in a former communist country in Eastern Europe, this is what we already had here decades ago and it’s only now being slowly dedeveloped away.
Oh, sure, flying cars SOUND like a cool idea. Until the first drunk driving accidents happen. And all car parks have to have landing strips. And everyone who wants to drive has to also take basic flight training (which btw is not "basically just driving only up").
We forget that all of those science fiction shows are about a tech dystopia and seek to illustrate a future where humans are degraded to replaceable components in the machinery of capitalism
I for one am ready for the ceres tight hallways and nauseating tight coriolis to achieve 1/3rd gravity and limited filtration systems always on the fritz~
I've been looking for a while at art of futuristic cities and my thoughts almost always end up as "Where are the parks? Where are the trees and greenways?"
I think Asimov did a good job in Caves of Steel and Naked Sun of showing how a futuristic metropolis or Eden, respectively, were actually prisons. The second obviously taking inspiration from The Machine Stops.
Would be a much more welcome sight than all these giant fields of asphalt containing metal death machines going at absurdly high speeds, or car dependent neighborhoods of completely identical single family homes with nothing to do in them.
And, in return, that trick just brainstormed most of Silicon Valley into thinking “SF showed me the future I can make!!” as opposed to them really understanding some of SF’s true dystopian play. A plague on all their SV bubbles, I say! 🤷♀️
And plenty of benches and places to sit or even lie down on a nice day, or just on your lunch break. No hostile architecture.
Parks with trees, bathrooms, working water fountains, playgrounds, and community gardens in safely walkable distances of each neighborhood.
Reductions in sprawl.
All the transit and sidewalks are accessible; there are cute little grocery stores and bookshops and cafes within a short walk of every apartment tower; healthcare is universal and social services are easy to access.
We got tricked by religion into thinking the city of god is all about power, rules and exclusion but what it really looks like is nice apartment blocks, good mass transit, pedestrian zones with shade trees and safe bike lanes. And libraries with a coffee shop.
This reminds me of a rant one of my CSci professors went on (decades ago, now!) about how desktop PCs were an abomination, the goal was supposed to be for computing devices to be unobtrusive, like the one in your refrigerator.
sometimes it’s BOTH but this was not something I realized until I went to a Frank Lloyd Wright exhibit at the Guggenheim and the “Usonian city” watercolor smacked me in the face like HERE IS THE DC AREA AS DESCRIBED IN STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND
Heinlein was a Wright fanboy, you see