|
b-boy bouiebaisse@jbouie.bsky.social |
constitutional lawyers use your fucking brain challenge www.politico.com/news/2024/07...
144 replies 361 reposts 2416 likes
|
|
Dan
@dandwiggins.bsky.social
[ View ] |
When does Alexander Litvinenko get his day in court, then?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Cwnidog ššµšø
@cwnidog.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But the DoJ and Bureau of Prisons could ignore the order.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Cate š¬
@catebridget.bsky.social
[ View ] |
what courts? lmao
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Odie
@theodeity.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The phrase "Illegally imprisoned" kinda misses the point
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Partyglouberman
@partyglouberman.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The entire profession of being a constitutional lawyer has proven to be a complete fucking joke.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Taka Hanazawa
@takahanazawa.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"I demand a writ of habeas corpus for having my house drone striked"
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@fcburleigh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They're working hard to make the decision and its implications be something other than what it and they are.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Kyle Daly
@dalykyle.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If the president ordered me renditioned to a CIA black site to be tortured, I would simply invoke due process
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
@arrogantmonkey.bsky.social
[ View ] |
the "reasonable people" expecting ordinary government employees to resist a president's illegal orders with no prospect of support from responsible parties
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Seth A Quimby-Big dumb monkey
@teamquimby.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Itās like saying sure I gave the thief keys to your house, but technically he can just come in. He canāt steal anything I mean thatās against the law.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
David Sugerman
@davidsug.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Law professors who have never set foot in a courtroom should stfu right now.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Blue Spook
@tiborm.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Maybe put them in a little glass box while theyāre in the court!
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
punwithwordz
@lexophile.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If all the red states were to form a separate country with Dear Leader as its President, would they agree to this SCOTUS opinion?
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
@thewanderingturkey.com
[ View ] |
āIām not obsolete, I swear!ā ā in-denial constitutional law experts right now
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Kevin J. Rogers
@kevinjrogers.bsky.social
[ View ] |
In a fight between the guy with a piece of paper and the guy with the guns -- lots and lots of guns -- guess who wins.
1 replies 1 reposts 2 likes
|
Dalton
@daltonherriott.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Just ask to be let out after being arrested by order of the dictator
1 replies 0 reposts 46 likes
|
VCarlson
@vcarlson.bsky.social
[ View ] |
WTF is with all these people saying, āSure, Trumpās fundamentally dishonest and McConnell created two mutually exclusive positions to pack SCOTUS, but the following guardrail/institution will ABSOLUTELY protect us.ā When their history says they WILL ignore anything inconvenient.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
David Bailey
@drgdave.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If a president illegally murdered a political opponent, their corpse would be entitled to a court order to be resurrected.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Let's build more housing
@dereksbabble.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The gangrene in my leg will go away if I ignore it hard enough.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
The American Civil War Podcast
@uscivilwar.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If a President is wiling to do that, then the previous ruling is irrelevant anyway. What it does do (dangerous enough!) is to effectively make lawlessness perfectly legal. The President may now as per SCOTUS accept bribes or imprison of opponents, or do anything else under his/her office.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Matt Goldberg
@mattgoldberg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Big āI will simply defeat them in the marketplace of ideasā energy.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
MissyLissa.bsky.social
@missylissa.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Stares in Korematsu.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Normal One
@normalatty.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And if the president then instructs whichever federal employees to not follow that court orderā¦well you canāt prosecute him for that because itās an āofficial act.ā
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@foxfire50.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah I am sure Trump's cronies will let you out after he tells them to put you in there.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Sean Scott
@oraclesean.com
[ View ] |
"Just get a court order."
Easier said than done, Exhibit A.
bsky.app/profile/radl...
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Sean Scott
@oraclesean.com
[ View ] |
"Entitled to" is doing a lot of work here.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Cacao Byproduct
@cacaobyproduct.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Has Fallon read any recent habeas cases or ever litigated a habeas
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
TommyBenBergman
@tbapple.bsky.social
[ View ] |
āEntitled to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars and wait years in prison while appealing their imprisonment to the Supreme Court.ā - fixed
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Dan
@dsmith1980.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I feel a little bad for people who have made their entire career the interpretation of constitutional text and decisions and now have to confront the fact that itās all bullshit nonsense and always has been.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Daniel Gilmore
@gilmored85.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You have got to be fucking kidding me
0 replies 0 reposts 13 likes
|
Voder of BORG
@crosis101.bsky.social
[ View ] |
You remember that part of Game Of Thrones where Ned Stark holds up a letter from Robert Baratheon transferring power to him and Cearsy grabs it and chucks it in the fire and he gets his head cut off? This is like that.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
MI-Forest
@maiee.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The job of many (not all) lawyers is to weasel their clients out of accountability. Their goal is not necessarily to obtain justice as it is to beat the system. They are *trained* in how to do this. That isn't a kind view and probably not a fair view, but to some extent it is an accurate view.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Ambrellite
@ambrellite.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Institutionalists comforting themselves with the fact that laws still exist under a dictatorship are well on their way to becoming good Nazis.
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Andy Pearlman
@apearlma.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Trump is dreaming of doing what MBS did. A couple extra judges in the Ritz will quickly convince other judges not to even think about it.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Matt D.
@tomorroejones.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They are just saying āit canāt happen hereā while closing their eyes.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Gordos52
@gordos52.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Completely' is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Jeff Mac
@jeffmacishere.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Entitled to go to a COURT, you say? Cool. Cool. That shit always works.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
August Pamplona
@cosmicaug.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Ā«The biggest challenge for a president ordering an assassination would be finding military personnel willing to carry out the order,...Ā» Trivially easy to do. Re-enlist Erik Prince (core power as CIC). Ask for 10 guys & re-enlist them promising pardons if things go south (core power). Do the deed.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
August Pamplona
@cosmicaug.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So when you start testing out your power, do not jail your opponents? Just move directly to killing them?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
David Kuhne
@davidkuhne.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh cool Liz Cheneyās got nothing to worry about
0 replies 0 reposts 17 likes
|
@retiredandlovingit.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And if POTUS imprisoned that person in Guantanamo? Pay attention President Biden.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
unhipcat
@unhipcat.bsky.social
[ View ] |
then just kill him. See how much he appeals then.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Kvetch & Release
@kvetchrelease.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The faith of liberal law professors in the rule of law would be touching if it were not so dangerous.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Super Mecha Dad
@supermecha.dad
[ View ] |
I used to work in IT. One of the hardest parts is that a whole skill set you've spent years developing can be rendered useless because of a paradigm shift. We are watching this happen, live, with constitutional law under this court.
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Helena "I Hate Living in the Democalypse" Montana
@helenajmontana.bsky.social
[ View ] |
How long would it take SCOTUS to overturn that?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Jon Berg
@jonjberg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Big "it's simple we kill the batman" vibes here.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Fava Bean
@fava.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is a guy who should never have a moment's peace. He lives in Massachusetts. Works in Cambridge. Is openly fascist. Alito has security. This guy needs to suffer under constant protest.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Grumpy Philosopher
@stevecooke.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If a president is empowered and emboldened to arbitrarily jail his or her opponents then you are well past the point of relying upon the rule of law to keep power in check. These are not the sorts of abuses that be made OK by hoping that courts will undo them after the fact.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Chris, Keeper of the Sacred Floof
@calmicc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Difficulty: Impossible.
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
|
@rednecklefty.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Andy Jackson had something to say about this, I believe.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Mr. Thursday
@mrthursday.bsky.social
[ View ] |
People need to stop freaking out about the idea of the President ordering the military to assassinate an opponent. We have hospitals with really advanced trauma care in the US, they'll patch up those gunshot wounds no problem.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Quaker in a Basement
@josephmoran.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Do I have this right? The prof says the decision doesn't give the president power to do anything he wants, but it does mean he can't be punished if he does illegal stuff. Is that about it?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Quaker in a Basement
@josephmoran.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And that would happen very quickly, like within 3 or 4 years to be sure.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Michelle Lamb
@mlamb.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Harvard law is not sending their best.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Johari Menelik Frasier
@joharifrasier.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Elite lawyer brain strikes again. That's not at all realistic.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Dustin Du Cane
@dustinducane.bsky.social
[ View ] |
President: kill that guy Marine: yes sir President: hereās a pardon Marine: yes sir President: official act
0 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
Confirmed Professional Agitator
@mumbly-joe.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Every, every, every time fedsoc.org/contributors...
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Ken Lowery
@kenlowery.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I imagine him reading out loud from law books, red-faced, as he is led to an oubliette
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Pooh
@rjl.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I'd imagine constitutional law professors in particular are having a moment where they're realizing everything they have believed and have been teaching has been false, and some aren't going to be able to handle it.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Nerdy Mushroom
@nerdymushroom.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Nah he's a Harvard boy. They're not trained for that there.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Fountainhead this
@jaocomms.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is a man deeply in need of a pair of ruby slippers.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
VanVelding
@vanvelding.bsky.social
[ View ] |
And what is the president going to do? Ignore the judiciary? No, that would be ille--oh wait.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Potomatic
@onbluskysku.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They canāt kill you thatās illegal!
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
|
b-boy bouiebaisse
@jbouie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
the world in which the president is throwing his opponents in jail is not a world where you can just ask a judge to let you out
50 replies 190 reposts 1829 likes
|
Hollywood Hank Hill
@audleyzdarke.bsky.social
[ View ] |
A court order! That'll work!
1 replies 0 reposts 14 likes
|
Maggie Fritz-Morkin
@emeffem.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Layperson squinting at this mess: do any of the constitutional amendments still have teeth?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Bouba O'Kiki
@bleary.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If someone tries to murder you, simply tell them thatās illegal
0 replies 4 reposts 60 likes
|
bob barker š
@insortediaboli.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh neat, weāre talking in extreme hypotheticals of the president jailing his opponents and they canāt see that as anything more than a thought experiment
1 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
|
@prexit.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So what he's saying is, the President should always go for the kill
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Tristan Palmgren
@tristanpalmgren.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Constitutional lawyers take a single fucking history class challenge
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
BƩnƩdicte C
@benecal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Constitutional lawyers are going to be the last ones to admit the system is irrevocably broken. Their whole raison-d'ĆŖtre is explaining how ConLaw is beautifully balanced between opposing forces. Panglossian pundits.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
The future producer of āHimbo Heistā
@legalminimum.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But note: Harvard. Where law is taught as a completely abstract intellectual game, which results in graduates who happily work for these clowns.
1 replies 0 reposts 18 likes
|
Dan McFadden
@danmcfadden.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I see a lot people relying on an assumption that Trump in a second term would do what courts tell him to do, and... I have some serious questions about why they feel entitled to assume that.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
decafbeef
@decafbeef.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"it's fine, actually, because you can always have a civil rights lawyer file a habeas corpus petition for you" meets "the president can send civil rights lawyers he finds annoying to Gitmo, and it's an official act if he says it is"
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
My Chihuahua has seen things
@bkbirge.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The "but norms" crowd sure seem to have their head in the ground.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Adam Serwer
@adamserwer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is incredible. A level of terminal lawyer brain never seen before
6 replies 6 reposts 243 likes
|
Karma's Dad
@karmasdad.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This explains, in part, the trash that Harvard has been sending out into the legal profession.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Zoomer Antimillenarian
@surcomplicated.bsky.social
[ View ] |
To spell it out for ppl who don't get this: the Trump v. US ruling appears to make it impossible to hold a president in contempt for illegal orders that he's been explicitly told by courts are illegal orders, even civilly.
0 replies 1 reposts 13 likes
|
šµšøDr. Tim Henke (tÉŖm 'ɦÉÅ.kÉ)
@timhenke.bsky.social
[ View ] |
*in Guantanamo Bay, being tortured* actually I have the right to request a court order
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@dirtydancing2hn.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The idea of what a person āwould be entitled toā by the constitution means little after the Chief Justice declared withoutāconstitutional backingāthat the motive for the imprisonment cannot be investigated.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Dr Tom Hill
@tomhjhill.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What if the president gives blanket pardons to an armed gang who build an illegal detention center and they lock me up there? And the president tells everyone they had better stay the heck away? And the detention center is in a place with a MAGA sheriff and a MAGA governor? Asking for a judge.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Alice
@thealice.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Peak lawyer brain is insisting everything is fine if you can make an argument for it
0 replies 0 reposts 30 likes
|
CR
@yourfriendbap.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is being framed as a power grab by the court, because they get to decide what's an official act. But the logical conclusion is an executive who can tell the courts to pound sand. Whatever power they've taken, they've immediately turned around and ceded to the executive.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@surfingthepast.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"While the president could assassinate a political rival, he could just go to the court and order the assassination be undone."
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@hrlatinam.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They think that somehow the US will maintain its constitutional order under right-wing authoritarianism. Just insane.
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
JaneLane
@nyjanelane.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Had to read this three or four times because I was sure I had misunderstood, no one could be that stupid
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Jamison Foser
@jamisonfoser.bsky.social
[ View ] |
āEntitled to a court order to go freeā what the
2 replies 0 reposts 19 likes
|
@cmerlin.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Why didn't navalny think of that??!
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
All The City Lights
@atcl.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Surely no president would suspend habeas corpus!
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Warhammerchick
@celticdragon1.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The system can never fail....
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
|
Ali Fleih
@alifleih.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The worst part isn't whether what a president does may be later ruled unconstitutional. It is that they can do it, harm people in the process, and get away with it because they cannot be prosecuted. Whatever the president does, so long as Congress remains handcuffed, they won't be thrown in prison.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
dmark
@dmark.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What if he illegally killed someone. Could they appeal to the court?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Ham Elliot
@r0wdy.sk33t.expert
[ View ] |
How is a judge going to free someone from a facility controlled by the Bureau of Prisons, controlled by the DOJ, controlled by a lawless president? They going to walk in with a gun and enforce their decision?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Captain Tom
@jonforsyth.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Good thing any and every possible Presidential action can be undone by a court!
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@jdtechie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Every one of these guys has the same CV: went to Ivy League undergrad and law school, clerked for SCOTUS or Fed judge, then directly into academia where they just write law review articles for 40 years without applying an ounce of critical thinking. Just a hack.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
jesse
@jesseltaylor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
the constitutional equivalent of "if you're poor, ask your parents for money"
1 replies 0 reposts 66 likes
|
Old Millenialā¢ļø
@brooktrout.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Is this guy a Heritage Foundation fellow or some bs like that too?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Mel in Baltimore
@mbe19.bsky.social
[ View ] |
HCR says people are not recognizing that the foundation of our democracy HAS BEEN TORN UP. www.pbs.org/newshour/sho...
0 replies 8 reposts 16 likes
|
|
@stpetedave.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That reads like an 18th century solution to a 21st century problem
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Andrew Bloomberg
@andrewbloomberg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
*The Harvard Law Professor in āThe Paper Chaseā voice* Hereās a dime. Call your mother and tell her youāll never be equipped for a constitutional crisis
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
|
@jmlandau.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Hahahahaha. Good luck.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
The Fig Economy
@figgityfigs.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Constitutional scholars looking at this like āwho would win, Adam Warlock or Superman?ā
1 replies 1 reposts 11 likes
|
Simon Birenbaum
@simonbirenbaum.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The whole point is that it's not even clear what it means for the president to "illegally" do something anymore.
2 replies 0 reposts 48 likes
|
@pompouswarm.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"The biggest challenge for a president ordering an assassination would be finding military personnel willing to carry out the order, legal experts explained" Legal experts having never read a single history book
2 replies 0 reposts 46 likes
|
|
cyberrb25 #7291
@cyberrb25.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's cute how they use reversible issues to put the perspective. Now check and balance an execution ā the law is unable to restitute life onto a person. If anything, the best way to force an amendment, thanks to the SCOTUS ruling, to revert it, is to gunpoint the legislators into approving that.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@dmlundeen.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Itās remarkably hard for some to do so. Harvard Law, theyāre not sending their best. Some of them, I assume, are smart people.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Franklin Pissšŗš¦
@silkscreenfiend.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I'm sorry, but can you say definitively that *no* angels can dance on a pinhead? I didn't think so.
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Kevin
@kevinrmatthews.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Matt Salomone
@matthematics.com
[ View ] |
He exudes an impressive infallibility
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Sean H
@tlanta-sean.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Con Law Professors are the buggy whip manufacturers of the legal world.
0 replies 1 reposts 1 likes
|
Brianna Chesser
@chessercat.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Hillary, Obama, and Biden will be entitled to habeas corpus writs is the best argument Iāve seen so far.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Trey Bushart
@treybushart.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Can they explain how is punishment after the fact preventative?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
JoyComethInTheMorning
@sheadapts.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The Saddam "you missed a spot" excuse. No one is going to countermand the mob boss in the Whitehouse. (We might start removing our money from banks.)
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Andy
@royhell.bsky.social
[ View ] |
All this fuss when people will simply be able to apply for a court order to have seal team 6 revive them.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
LurkyMcLurk
@lurkymclurk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Constitutional lawyer walking up to a lynching in Mississippi 100 years ago: Well akshulllly this is not in the constitution
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
|
LurkyMcLurk
@lurkymclurk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Fallon test this out challenge
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@gmeluski.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Alsoā¦ youāre still imprisoned for some period of time, and that is wrong!
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
lynnaean.bsky.social
@lynnaean.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Harvard
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Greg Lastname
@orpach.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Wait, was the only thing stopping POTUS from being able to imprison people with an "official order" and nothing else the possibility of being criminally liable for it? That seems like a very low bar. If it's a bar at all. Did I miss another part of that ruling?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Tamara Keel
@tamslick.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Someone needs to tell that WSJ reporter in Putinās gulag to just call a judge.
0 replies 0 reposts 24 likes
|
robertus
@robertus.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I will simply use my one phone call, to which I am Constitutionally entitled and will certainly get after I have been disappeared to a prison camp, to get that process started.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
OGfattcatt
@ogfattcatt.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Iāve met maybe 4 people from Harvard in my life and every one has been a total pants-on-head moron in a $3000 suit.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Andrea
@andrea.tryste.ro
[ View ] |
...and when the President just ignores a writ of habeas corpus it would be ... oh yes, the now-unenforceable crime of contempt of court
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Flopsie
@flopsie.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yah, well. The Supreme Court just said something stated explicitly in the constitution is not law. All Trump needs is a properly MAGA judge to keep anyone in jail indefinitely if he wins.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
empty seats can't melt supreme court justices
@emptyjetseatbribes.bsky.social
[ View ] |
you're supposed to put (impossible) in like that after
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
cats_hell_yeah
@sukatra.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"Entitled to a court order to go free" assuming their lawyers can get a judge to grant such an order, it will be reviewed by an appellate court and a SCOTUS that has been completely captured by the federalist society, yeah that's gonna work
1 replies 0 reposts 10 likes
|
Mike Puterbaugh
@mike.puterbaugh.net
[ View ] |
Fallon is an embarrassment to Harvard Law, and Harvard Law sucks
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Kombiz Lavasany
@kombiz.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Amazing - they are everywhere. fedsoc.org/contributors...
3 replies 0 reposts 37 likes
|
Roy
@royx.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"the president has thrown you in jail illegally, but of COURSE he would allow you to make your case in court, if he didn't that would be illegal!"
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Professor Furious
@professorfurious.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Our elites are so desperately stupid. I was just talking to a friend of mine about people who see each thing that happens in isolation from all other things, completely unable to see patterns in occurrences and abstract from them to trends and likely predictions.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Lion-O Hutz
@lion-ohutz.bsky.social
[ View ] |
...I would simply inform the leopard of my right to keep my face.
0 replies 0 reposts 14 likes
|
Tim Park
@timpark.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But only if said imprisoned people were right wing
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Scott Imberman
@imbernomics.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
@docstock.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Lol. Lmao, even.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Jennifer Van Goethem
@jennvg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh my sweet jesus these law brained idiots.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Bass Of Pj
@bassofpj.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Ah yes, just go petition for that court order in front of one of the judges the POTUS who just threw your ass in jail, appointed to the bench.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
BFR
@bfr74.bsky.social
[ View ] |
A lot of these people are going to be in for a rude awakening when they figure out that the piece of paper (that they just smeared shit all over no less) wonāt protect them from people with guns.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
The J. Cobb
@thejcobb.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We already have a 14th Amendment. Thereās nothing to overthink.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
NoonGoon
@noongoon.bsky.social
[ View ] |
These people have been writing goofy law school exams for too long, entertaining themselves with how clever they think they are.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
William Li
@williamlidc.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This fucker has never petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in his life (has he ever filed anything?)
0 replies 0 reposts 8 likes
|
TheBaroness
@thebaroness.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Richard Fallon is an idiot.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Joshua Foust šŖš®
@joshuafoust.com
[ View ] |
You canāt even establish the legality of detainment because they made official records of the order inadmissible.
0 replies 1 reposts 13 likes
|
Peter
@notalawyer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
if you are killed you can seek a declaratory judgment finding that you shouldnāt have been killed.
6 replies 19 reposts 539 likes
|
Fourteen Kittens in a Trenchcoat
@kittensinacoat.bsky.social
[ View ] |
look if trump issues an order to have you killed, your relatives could have that order declared illegal. as long as he didn't have them killed too, of course anyway as you can see We The People still hold the power in th
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes